Alien Abduction Part 4

Alien implants

Jul 07, 2024

Attorney Terry Lovelace’s X-ray showing an anomalous square object in his thigh.

See Part 3: Protection and resistance techniques

Thomas Bullard found 13 implant cases in the published accounts up to 1985. The earliest hint was in the Betty Andreasson case, published in 1979. During the 1967 abduction that featured the phoenix, this occurred (summarized by Bullard):

At this point he stuck a needle-like device up her nostril and penetrated into her head, touching her head to take away the pain. While the needle remained in her head another being brought over a small roll of webbed paper, which Quazgaa examined and then withdrew the needle. It now seemed to have a tiny burrlike ball attached to the end.

In 1980, two more cases were published: Harry Joe Turner recalled something being implanted in his shoulder the previous year, and under hypnosis Lori Briggs (of the Tujunga Canyon contacts) said there was a “tuning thing” in her spine during a 1970 experience. In 1981 two more cases were published: Aarno Heinonen said “an alien device was implanted in his back and another in his friend’s forehead” (also in 1970). Mike Lewis recalled under hypnosis an “examination in which a needle inserted or withdrew something from his nose” when he was 5 years old. Such reports grew in frequency in the following years until implants were established as a key part of abduction lore by the early 1990s.

Paul Bennewitz was the first to theorize about implants in depth. He researched the topic in 1980 and 1981 (while the above scattered cases were first being published) before completing “Project Beta,” where he wrote:

A case history of an Encounter Victim [Myrna Hansen] in New Mexico [led] to the […] discovery that apparently all encounter victims have deliberate alien implants along with obvious accompanying scars. The victim’s implants were verified by X-ray and CAT scan. Five other scar cases were verified.

This would indicate a possible immediate threat or danger for anyone – military, Air Force, or otherwise that has been at the base. […] The reason for the implant is multiple for both language or communication by thought […] and also complete absolute control by the alien through program[ming] – by their beam or direct contact.
I have tested this and found that during this programming the person is totally alien; once one learns to recognize the signs and the person then has no memory of the act/conversation afterward. If this has happened to the military I need not elaborate as to the possible consequences. The victim’s “switch” can be pulled at any time and at the same time they are “walking cameras and microphones” if the alien chooses to listen in with the use of them beams. No classified area of any endeavor in the US is inviolate under these conditions.

Most researchers would come to prefer the “tagging” hypothesis to Bennewitz’s more conspiratorial vision. The Cassiopaean transcripts suggest Bennewitz was probably closer to the truth than he has gotten credit for.

Part 2 of this series contained a few references to implants. For example, Pat Z.’s was said to be “for possible future activation” (1996-1-7). Several implant-related questions were asked over the years, beginning in the first session:

July 16, 1994

Q: (C) Where is my implant?
A: Head.
Q: (L) What are the implants for?
A: Study device.
Q: (L) To study what?
A: Soul composition.

July 30, 1994

Q: (L) Are [Mike and J.W.] in cahoots with the aliens?
A: Not knowingly. […] Subconscious. Implants.
Q: (L) Do we have implants?
A: Two implants; one monitor.
Q: (L) What is the difference between a monitor and an implant?
A: All are monitors. Implant is permanent. F. and L. have permanent implants. Candy got monitor three months ago. Next is implant.
Q: (L) Why?
A: To watch and observe you.
Q: (L) Why?
A: You are all higher-level beings. F. implant: 4 years old. L. implant: 5 years old. […]
Q: (L) Who is putting implants in us?
A: Orions.

October 9, 1994

Q: (L) Did they ever at any time do anything to my physical body to cause me problems?
A: Yes. […] Implant.
Q: (L) What kind of implant and where?
A: Brain. Silicon.
Q: (L) Did they ever put one in the lower part of my spine?
A: No.

October 25, 1994

Q: (L) Why does [schizophrenia] not usually show up until adolescence? Is this because adolescents are being abducted and having implants put in?
A: Not necessarily.
Q: (V) Do I have an implant in my right ear?
A: Yes.
Q: (V) It has been going off a lot lately.
A: Caused by your interactions with these powerful channels [L. and F.]. […]
Q: (V) Are they Lizard implants?
A: Yes. Monitoring heavily lately.
Q: (V) When did I get the implants?
A: Age 3.
Q: (L) How come Frank and I cause her implant to buzz? […]
A: Set off. […] They are concerned by V.G.’s communication with us through you.
Q: (L) What is their concern?
A: Losing mole.
Q: (L) As in espionage terminology. Is V.G. a mole?
A: Were subconsciously. […]
Q: (V) I just heard something in my left ear. Is that also an implant?
A: Yes.
Q: (V) Do they know what we are doing right at this moment?
A: Yes.
Q: (V) Should I stop and go home?
A: Up to you.
Q: (L) Why do the implants go off when they do?
A: Monitoring. They have reasons to monitor when they do. They can turn on the monitor and read everything that has gone on since the last monitoring. It is done at their convenience.

Perhaps related is what Jacobs originally called “mindscan.” In Walking Among Us, he writes: “In the second part of the table procedures, aliens perform neural engagement with abductees. They ‘look’ at what the abductees have been doing since they were last abducted.” Cell biologist Bruce Rapuano made the same connection, writing:

There is also considerable evidence that the alien beings who have purportedly abducted thousands of people are particularly interested in studying brain function. […] [“Mindscan”] has been observed to occur following the placement of the implant inside the body of the abductee, usually somewhere within the head. During the procedure, an alien being is reported to stare penetratingly into the abductee’s eyes. Abductees often feel that data of some sort is being extracted from their minds or the strange beings are “stealing their memories.”

He speculates that one purpose of this scanning is the “training and testing of a [convolutional neural network] or its alien analog.”

Q: (V) Do I have an implant in my left sinus which causes thick discharge?
A: Yes.
Q: (V) Am I going to be able to blow it out?
A: No.

The most common recalled abduction procedures include implant insertion or removal through the nose/sinuses, eye and ear using a long pencil- or wire-like instrument. While no implant was mentioned, Betty and Barney Hill recalled such a procedure in their 1961 abduction.

November 2, 1994

Q: (L) What do they do with implants?
A: Monitor.
Q: (L) Do they monitor our thoughts?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Do they monitor what we see?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Hear and feel?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Do the implants just monitor?
A: And control.
Q: (L) Do all of us have implants?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Are we under the control of the Grays?
A: Attempt.

In Alien Agendas, Richard Dolan writes: “Many abductees believe the implants can record everything they see and hear, and even their thoughts and emotions. Some also have expressed the belief that the information from these implants allows grays to ‘duplicate’ their own brain, perhaps allowing them to create a backup copy of themselves.” Rapuano also supports the mind control hypothesis, writing:

Are they simply electronic tracking devices placed inside unconscious abductees like tranquilized animals to observe their movements and locate them for reexamination and obtaining biological samples? Or are they more sophisticated devices that alien beings use to monitor or manipulate the thoughts, emotions, sensory impressions and experiences of their human experimental subjects? I believe that both of these functionalities are likely supported by the alien implants which, therefore, represent a highly advanced form of a brain–computer interface (BCI).

A fundamental assumption in analyzing what they may be doing with us is that one of the goals of the abduction program is to alter, influence or control our civilization at least partly by manipulating neurophysiology. Their first step would be to catalogue and decode the panoply of brain signal patterns for human mental activities – including sensual perceptions, motor control, emotions, learning, memory and executive functions such as decision-making and reasoning. This characterization of magnetic waveform patterns for human thought processes is probably one of the things that is happening during Mindscan.

An alien BCI would likely have the capability to furtively implant messages, ideas or instructions directly into the human unconscious that influence thoughts, feelings, learning or memory for the purpose of mind control

November 26, 1994

Q: (T) Do I have implants?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) These implants are what they use to control my emotions and amplify them so that they can feed off of them?
A: Not control, influence.
Q: (T) […] But when, say, I get angry, then I’m angry for a short time, but then I’m angry for a long time because they have used this technology to amplify and extend this – is this what they do?
A: Yes. Knowledge protects, ignorance endangers.
Q: (T) Can I feed back through their equipment what I choose?
A: Not necessary. […]
Q: (T) If you take a light socket and pull the socket… pull the plug on the light socket you no longer have light. (L) Well, the Lizzies are the light bulb and you are the power source so you just pull out their plug. (J) Unplug yourself. […]
A: How effective is a motor that is never turned on?
Q: (J) Do not be their source. If they feed off negative energy, starve them.
A: Implants are ineffective if not used.
Q: (J) The power source has to be on for the implant to work for them to get the juice, and the power is negative thoughts and emotions. (T) But I am still a 3rd-density being. I have all the emotions of a 3rd-density being, the whole gamut, and that is part of what makes me a 3rd-density being. Therefore I can’t turn one emotion off without upsetting the balance of the other emotions; emotions are almost an analogy to the light and the dark.
A: No.
Q: (T) I have positive emotions and I have negative emotions; they both make up who I am.
A: If you choose, you may have only positive emotions. […]
Q: (T) That’s all there is to it? But the implants will still be there?
A: So what?
Q: (T) Do the implants do anything besides transmit the frequency?
A: No.
Q: (T) And, as long as I am being negative it is transmitting and they can track me that way?
A: Close.
Q: (T) If I shut them off by being positive, they can’t track me any longer?
A: Can track but not influence.

One of John Mack’s subjects was made to understand that his implant (a “small, silver, pill-shaped thing” with “four tiny, tiny little wires coming off it”) would make it “easier to follow” him.

December 31, 1994

Q: (L) Did they put an implant in [M.]?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And what do they do with that implant?
A: Is monitor. Frequent ringing in ear signifies monitoring activity.
Q: (Frank) Do you have frequent ringing in your ear? (M) Yes. (L) One ear more than another? (M) Yes. It is kind of a tone. […] (L) Does [L.E.] have an implant?
A: No.
Q: (L) Does D. have an implant?
A: She has 4. […]
Q: (L) Where are they?
A: In brain.
Q: […] (D) What is their purpose?
A: Monitor.
Q: (L) That’s what they all are, monitors. (D) But, why?
A: You are aware.

February 25, 1995

Q: (L) Does G.B. have an implant?
A: Yes. […] In the brain.
Q: (L) What is it composed of?
A: Silicon.
Q: (L) Who put it in?
A: Grays.
Q: (BP) What is its purpose?
A: For Lizard monitor.
Q: (L) Well, we have all got one, so don’t feel strange. (GB) Is that right? (L) Has anybody in this room not got an implant?
A: L.M.
Q: (L) Yes, well, my husband doesn’t have one but that is only because he is an alligator hunter. [Laughter] […] (GB) So all of us have implants.
A: This is why you are all interested in this subject.
Q: (TM) My next question is, where is my implant?
A: You have two. One in brain behind sinus and one in leg bone.
Q: (TM) I have a suspicion that I might know when I got it, last year… I have been having nosebleeds. (GB) Well, your brain is behind your sinuses. (L) They have to go through your nose to get to your brain. (J) You may be aware of the penetration, but you are not aware of the final residence of the implant. […]

Rapuano discusses such procedures extensively, citing a number of cases of nosebleeds associated with abductions and implants, including his own at the age of six. As he writes: “The annals of UFO abduction reports are replete with examples of abductees describing the insertion of probes or sharp instruments of some kind into their nose.” Some physicians (including his own when a child) have commented on observing a strange “hole” in abductees’ nasal cavities indicative of prior surgery, which Rapuano suggests is an enlarged ostium – normally the result of endoscopic and microscopic endonasal surgery. Linda Cortile’s doctor was also convinced she had previously had surgery in her nose, observing what appeared to be scarring from a scalpel.

Q: (GB) Does my wife have an implant in her now? […]
A: Yes.
Q: (TM) I would like to find out the purpose of my implant.
A: Monitor.
Q: (J) Do I have an implant?
A: Yes.
Q: (J) Where is it?
A: This is getting redundant. […]
Q: (BP) Are all members of my immediate biological family implanted?
A: No. [The tape recorder was inadvertently left off after a break, during which these answers were given, which seem to relate to an abduction and implants:]
A: Two [implants?].
A: Head, brain stem and behind eye.
A: Missing time.
A: Light flash.
A: Roommate was zoned out.
A: Grays.

September 9, 1995 (direct channeling by Frank)

Q: (L) It also says that they implant some sort of crystal on the optic nerve of humans that is 2 to 4 microns in diameter and that this crystal is tuned to the frequency of the individuals implanting it, which allows them to establish a mental frequency for communication. Is that anywhere along the line of what you are talking about?
A: Physical implantations do occur. The precise locations vary according to the desired effects. And when it comes to the interactions between the human species in 3rd density, and other STS issues in 4th density, there are a variety of mechanisms in use as well as a variety of directives and objectives. For example, some implants are used merely for tracking. Others are used to alter consciousness, and still others are designed to be mind-altering or motor-altering mechanisms. Each of these has a different structure and a different material content according to which is being employed and for what purpose. The particular function you are describing there has been used, or, rather, something similar, though we are not completely familiar with that which you have described. So, we suggest that this may be fabrication to some extent, or expansion of accurate information. But, in any case, it is true that implants do get implanted for various reasons.

October 21, 1995

Q: (L) When I had [Candy] under hypnosis and I told her to travel along psychically and to read the minds of the aliens, and ask them or inquire of them what the purpose of the implants were, the response she got was that it was like connecting a bunch of speakers, and once all the speakers were connected, then the stereo was turned on. What does this mean?
A: Unit group mind. Activation. [Recall Pat Z. and “future activation.”]
Q: (L) So what will happen when they, as she said, turn on the stereo?
A: Wait and see.

In Thieves in the Night, Cutchin cites an experiencer who was told “he was one of many children of extraterrestrial parentage who ‘had tasks to perform and, at some future date when a major event was to occur, all of the star children would suddenly know who they were and would be able to communicate with one another.’” See the next part on “programming” for some possible implications of this response, as well as those below in reference to Pat Z.

January 7, 1996

Q: (L) So, Pat had an implant put in. An actual, physical implant. Where is it?
A: Behind sinus cavity.
Q: (L) What is this implant designed to do?
A: Activate behavioral control reflex and thought-pattern generation and alteration.
Q: (P) Is that why I can’t remember anything?
A: Some.

Linda Cortile was told by her abductors that her own implant was a “regulator” meant to “control her chemicals.” Moira McGhee writes: “The contactees themselves report many varied reactions to their implants, and their thoughts as to the reason for them. Obviously, they feel it is not only a tracking device, as their thoughts and emotions were being manipulated.”

January 20, 1996

Q: (P) What is the implant I have made of?
A: Silicon-based micron definitive construct.
Q: (P) Is this why I have this scar?
A: Scar is manifestation of scar in being.

Many alleged implants (like those of Whitley Strieber, Terry Lovelace, and Roger Leir’s patients) show up on imaging, but have no detectable scarring or point of entry. Others do, such as Linda Cortile’s and Bruce Rapuano’s. The scars’ presence or absence may relate to the method by which they inserted (see below).

May 25, 1996

Q: (L) How many people in the United States have implants?
A: 2 percent.

According to Jim McCampbell, Bennewitz asked J. Allen Hynek how many people he thought have been abducted: “Hynek unhesitatingly said about one out of forty [i.e. 2.5%].” Aerospace billionaire Robert Bigelow (also behind NIDS and AAWSAP) funded a Temple University study and poll in 1991 to determine how many Americans may have been abductees. The result was 2%. David Jacobs, who worked on the poll with Budd Hopkins and sociologist Ron Westrum, says that they were “ultra conservative” in their criteria, and the results had an error rate of +/-1.4%.

In their experiencer study, Marden and Stoner found that 62% “believe that they can feel an alien implant in their body.”

Denise [Stoner] felt one near her knee, but it is now gone and has been replaced by a scoop mark (punch biopsy) type scar. I observed and manually examined a pea-size lump in her lower arm that moved upward to her shoulder over a 5 day period and then disappeared.

November 14, 1998

Q: (M) I’ve had a series of dreams lately relating to each other and to what I feel are experiences with aliens. My Dad has been in many of them, usually as someone I go to for advice. Does this have to do with the fact that we have been getting closer over the years, and he has become supportive of my “quest”? Do I insert him into the dreams for comfort? Is there anything else about my father and these dreams?
A: Father is guide to repeating experience. […]
Q: (M) What do the staples represent?
A: Embedded silicon bead.
Q: (M) How did they get into my skin in the first place?
A: Projected. [This method will be covered in a future part.]
Q: (L) By whom?
A: 4th-density STS.
Q: (L) When?
A: Three times, starting at age six.

November 21, 1998

Q: (M) Will the silicon beads show up in an X-ray?
A: No.

December 12, 1998

Q: (BRH) What about this thing I had surgically removed from my back that went “plink” when it dropped into the tray?
A: Silicon based.
Q: (BRH) Well, the knot reappeared almost immediately.
A: Replaced.
Q: (BRH) Replaced by whom?
A: Those who use to transceive.
Q: (BRH) You are suggesting that this is an implant?
A: Yes. Those can happen in work setting, too. Could have been planted by a “coworker.”

January 2, 1999

Q: (BRH) Regarding the alleged implant in my back, I am considering having it removed. Is this a wise choice?
A: No.

August 20, 2001

Q: How many times has [T.] been abducted in her life?
A: 13. Given implants at age 5.
Q: (T) Where was I given them?
A: Nasal passage.

Implant Removal

On April 16, 1994, Harvard psychiatrist John E. Mack published an op-ed in the Washington Post in which he wrote:

Abductees frequently report that some sort of homing object has been inserted in their bodies, so that aliens can track or monitor them. These so-called implants may be felt as small nodules below the skin, and in several cases tiny objects have been recovered and analyzed biochemically and electromicroscopically.
MIT physicist David Pritchard, who has also been analyzing an implant that came out of a man’s penis, has written about the criteria for examining and determining the nature of such objects. I have myself studied a 1/2- to 3/4-inch thin, wiry object that was given to me by one of my clients, a 24-year-old woman, after it came out of her nose following an abduction experience. Elemental analyses and electronic microscopic photography revealed an interestingly twisted fiber consisting of carbon, silicon, oxygen, no nitrogen, and traces of other elements. A carbon isotopic analysis was not remarkable. A nuclear biologist colleague said the “specimen” was not a naturally occurring biological subject but could be a manufactured fiber of some sort. It seemed difficult to know how to proceed further.

December 31, 1994

Q: (T) Can implants be removed?
A: No.

A few accounts support this idea. Linda Cortile’s implant in her nose showed up on an X-ray. Jorjani writes: “Before a follow-up examination, which had been scheduled to investigate the implant, Linda woke up one morning with a nosebleed so bad that the dried blood had stuck her pillow to her face. The suspected implant was gone.” Hopkins speculates: “it appears that the aliens can somehow tell when an implant has been x-rayed and is likely to be removed, thereby allowing us a crucial piece of their technology. It is unlikely that they would ever let us capture such a prize if they could possibly prevent it.” He noted at the time that such anomalous removals of detected implants “are far from rare.”

Dr. John Lerma attempted to remove a suspected implant from Whitley Strieber’s ear in 1998. The object, which had been “firmly fixed in place,” appeared as a white disk when exposed during surgery. While exposed, it then burrowed itself an inch away from the incision. Before it relocated itself, Lerma was able to scrape off some fragments, which were later found to be “distressed collagen.” About a week after the attempted removal, it had migrated back to its original location.

Terry Lovelace also had his efforts thwarted. After an X-ray showed a square metallic object with attached wires embedded into the flesh above his knee (and a floating flower/petal-shaped collection of what displayed as bone in the upper calf), he scheduled a surgery to have it removed. He woke up two days before the surgery with pain in both legs and groin. Each thigh had a flower/petal-shaped bruise with what looked like a box-shaped insect bite in the center. Subsequent X-rays showed no trace of the implant(s), though a trace of wire remained. (Photographs are available in Incident at Devils Den.) This is what “Betty” had told Lovelace in 2017, less than a month before the above events:

“You have devices in both of your legs. They serve a purpose and they have caused you no harm. If you continue to speak publicly and if you publish your book, my hosts will recover them. That is the limit of my hosts’ concern. […] My hosts will not allow you to have them removed here and analyzed by terrestrial scientist[s] for their composition. They won’t harm you and you’ll experience no pain. They’ll remove them from your body while you’re sleeping. Your government also has interests in you and in your devices,” she added.

Tom DeLonge, Luis Elizondo, and Maj. Gen. Neil McCasland contacted Lovelace about his implant(s) in 2018.

February 25, 1995

Q: (BP) Would it be helpful in STO to be able to rid ourselves of these implants?
A: Do you wish to get a quick ticket to level 5 [i.e. die]?

According to Whitley Strieber, abductee Betty Ruth Dagenais waited until after death to have an object removed from her ear. She had been told “it would kill her to have it removed during her lifetime.” Rapuano recalls the “nagging feeling” as a child that he would “be punished if it [his nasal implant] somehow became dislodged due to my own fault.”

June 17, 1995 (direct channeling via Frank)

Q: (L) Is there any method that we could or should know about to remove or deactivate implants?
A: No, you are not capable of doing that without causing death of the host. And, by the way, please don’t believe those who claim that they can do such things as they cannot.

Prior to these time there were only a few reports of recovered implants – either removed during surgery or naturally expelled from the body. As of 1998, this was Ann Druffel’s assessment on the state of the physical evidence:

A few objective researchers, including Dr. David Pritchard of MIT, Richard M. Neal Jr., M.D., and myself attempted to scientifically validate claims of alien implants […] No solid evidence or verification emerged. […] Alien implants were proven to be benign cysts or other explainable occurrences […]

In 1999, Tony Dodd wrote:

[…] some American researchers claim to have removed implants and had them analysed, but there is, as yet, no credible scientific evidence of this.
Our theory about why we are actually unable to remove and examine implants is that they are designed to self-destruct when removed from the body: there are stories of abductees actually having these small metallic objects in their possession, only to find they have vanished within a few hours. Another theory is that, to be sustained within the body, they are made of substances that would not be rejected by our tissues, and can be absorbed into our bodies.

August 12, 1995

Q: (L) So, if someone removes an implant, the best way to keep it here would be to smash it?
A: If someone removes an implant it is no longer functioning as it was designed to function.

Note the disparity between responses. The first was a definitive no. Now it seems that removal may be possible, but only in the case that the implant has become inoperative. (It’s also possible the early comments applied to brain implants. All the alleged expelled or removed implants came from extremities.) Rapuano speculates along these lines in reference to an implant allegedly expelled from an abductee’s nose in 1996. It was hollow, composed primarily of carbon and oxygen, and could be stretched out up to three times its length. Carbon fibers usually break “at only 2% strain.” More than 20 years later flexible carbon aerogels were discovered, consisting of graphene oxide and multi-walled carbon nanotubules.

[A carbon aerogel] could also function as a strain sensor to detect any mechanical deformation caused by a surgeon attempting to remove an implant containing this material from inside the nasal cavity, perhaps causing it to power down, delete memory or cease transmitting signals.

Coincidentally, just one week after this session, Dr. Roger Leir performed his first surgical removals of suspected implants. Leir had partnered with Derrel Sims, who possessed X-rays showing potential implants. Over the next years, Leir (funded in part by Bigelow’s NIDS) performed such surgeries on 17 abductees. The first edition of his book, The Aliens and the Scalpel, was published in 1998. Biological and metallurgic analyses yielded some interesting findings:

Several of the objects were encased in a hard, smooth, gray, biological membrane impervious to the scalpel. When dehydrated, the membranes could removed and were found to be composed of protein coagulum (involved in blood clotting), hemosiderin (related to hemoglobin), and keratin (usually found in the outermost layer of skin and in hair and fingernails).
The surrounding soft tissue showed no signs of an inflammatory response to the foreign objects. (Leir speculated the above membranes facilitated this.) It also contained high concentrations of nerve receptors usually found near the surface skin (like fingertips), potentially explaining patients’ pain responses during the surgery despite local anesthetic.
Each object varied in size, shape and elemental composition: several “cantaloupe seeds,” a metallic “T,” a metallic triangle, balls and rods. The main elements of the earliest implants were copper, calcium, iron, barium and aluminum. Traces of europium, ruthernium and samarium were also detected in one sample. The “T” had an iron core and was “clearly engineered and manufactured with precision.” The most common result of the metallic objects was that their composition most closely resembled “meteoric iron.”
Many were highly magnetic, and a few emitted detectable EM fields (which ceased “broadcasting” 2 to 3 months after removal).
When viewed under a UV light, they fluoresced green or pink.
All were located on the left side of the body (and all patients had chronic salt cravings).

He also cites one possible silicon implant:

Electron microscope enhancements of a silicon implant which was brought to a lab to be tested by Whitley Strieber showed the same thing—the implant was not a broken shard, but a cleanly manufactured object with smooth edges.

In a 2009 update on his research, Leir stated that 7 of the recovered objects were nearly identical to each other. Dr. Alex Mosier shared some additional results: meteoric composition (with abnormal nickel isotope ratios), magnetic and emitting a 14.7 MHz signal, nanofibers that looked like carbon nanotubules, and unusually configured salt crystals. Mosier called it “a functional device that may serve to monitor or control.” Patient #15’s object had abnormal boron, magnesium, nickel and copper isotopes and traces of iridium, gallium and germanium. It emitted in the 1.2 GHz, 110 and 17 MHz, and 8 Hz bands before removal.

Leir conducted his last removal in 2014 on “patient #17,” shortly before dying of a heart attack. That object was also meteoric iron and contained 36 elements, including elevated levels of some rare earth elements and abnormal zinc isotope rations. (Incidentally, the patient also related the successful use of mental and physical struggle during an abduction.) It’s still unclear the origin and purpose of the objects Leir recovered and their relation, if any, to the implants (primarily located within the brain) discussed by the C’s.

In 2023 Bruce Rapuano published Dominion Lost, in which he elaborated his own history of probable abduction experiences and highly detailed scientific analyses of related technologies. As he put it, what can be gleaned about alien implants represents “a logical extrapolation of current human theoretical and applied science,” including BCI/CBI’s and metamaterials. Specifically, he sees implants as potential “single unit magnetic field sensors” composed of metamaterials with specific properties allowing them to sense, cancel, project and focus “specific magnetic field waveforms,” essentially exerting a highly advanced form of control of human neural processes anywhere in the brain.

After summarizing all of the latest scientific developments and future trends in these fields, he comments:

[…] the most interesting general finding to emerge regarding the composition or behavior of these implanted objects is how they seemed to portend technological developments in human materials science 1–2 decades later. Decades after discovery of the implanted gold-silver spheres, the materials in the alloy were used to create matamaterials with unusual electromagnetic properties that would allow them to project magnetic fields in free space at a distance.
Both silicon carbide and hollow carbon fibers were specially designed to be effective at shielding electronics from microwave EMI 15–20 years after intranasal implants containing these materials were retrieved from reported abductees. Their electrical conductivity and capacitance, the semicondunctor properties of silicon carbide fibers, and carbon fiber designs that mimicked the mechanical elasticity of the implant carbon fibers investigated by Whitley Strieber were also investigated within this time frame.

Alien Abduction Part 4

Alien implants

September 9, 1995 (direct channeling by Frank)

Implant Removal

Further reading

Discussion about this post