UFOs/UAP Part 6
UFO propulsion and consciousness
Propulsion
Dr. Jason Jorjani, in his book Closer Encounters, sees transhumanism, time travel, parapsychology and spacetime manipulation all as intimately connected with the UFO phenomenon, writing: “Electro-gravitic space-time warping technology affords those who invent it the ability to transcend four-dimensional existence and begin to operate in a fifth-dimensional hyperspace.” This hyperspace is roughly equivalent to what the Cassiopaeans call “fourth density” and which they say is closely associated with UFO technology.
A few short comments specifically related to UFO propulsion systems have already been included in previous sections:
October 28, 1994
Q: (L) [Bob Lazar’s] video about working at Area 51 and descriptions of propulsion systems and alien craft was or was not truth?
A: Close to the truth. Craft tech: minor points were off.
Bruce Rapuano, in a discussion on Lazar’s claims about an antimatter reactor able to produce gravitational wave energy with element 115 (Muscovium) as fuel in his book Dominion Lost (2023), writes:
Unfortunately, it does not appear that Lazar was able to obtain enough experimental evidence to demonstrate that the reactor for the alien propulsion system worked in the way that he said it did. Moreover, there is no clear straightforward path between current mainstream physics and a theoretical mechanism by which an antimatter-powered propulsion system, as Lazar described it, could create antigravity or a spacetime metric favorable for travel between the stars. However, that does not mean that the essential elements of his story are not true.
May 7, 1995
Q: (J) Is [angel hair/slag] a byproduct of the propulsion systems?
A: And of transdimensional maneuvers.
June 3, 1995
Q: (L) Do thunderstorms or electrical activity inhibit [UFOs]?
A: Ionization.
December 4, 1999
Q: (A) Is [the space headquarters] in a circular orbit or an elliptical orbit?
A: Circular. Rotation is altered by guidance system, gravitationally powered.
The first extensive discussion of propulsion took place in 1995 with physicist Ruggero Santilli in attendance and asking questions:
May 27, 1995
Q: (RS) I want to know whether we can have any clues on the propulsion systems of UFOs?
A: Sure!
Q: (RS) What’s the mechanism of the propulsion?
A: This is difficult to answer when posed in such a manner, as we are talking about multiple realities, density levels and various modes as well!! […]
Q: (RS) […] the only way that I can perceive traveling the long distances involved in interstellar space is to have what is called a “spacetime” machine. We cannot move the enormous distances unless you can fold, somehow, time and space. You cannot fold space unless you join it and fold time. You cannot have interstellar travel unless you have a spacetime machine. But, a spacetime machine means to also have the ability to move forward and backward in time, to manipulate time. […] In our third level, the motion in space and time occurs via the change of the unit of time and space; therefore, can we change the unit? [This “changing the unit” seems to imply some form of spacetime metric engineering, discussed below.]
A: Yes, this is precisely what we mean when we speak of “transiting from 4th to 3rd.”
Q: […] (RS) Now, the question of the units, it is very important, a fundamental question, because, say, you are outside a UFO, and you see the UFO as big as a car, say, and people go inside and report this enormous interior. There is no other way to do this than by changing the unit. What is for us one inch, that unit is completely different inside. For us the unit is the same along the three directions. Now, if you are inside, they can have different units in different directions. This means that if you are outside a cube, and you go inside, the shape, not only the dimensions but the shape even, can be different.
A: Density-borderline cross-awareness.
Q: […] (RS) At the third level, is it true that the value of the dimension is changed by the available energy, or the energy is used to change the value of the units? [According to Hal Puthoff’s theory, below, an immense amount of energy is required for this kind of spacetime engineering.]
A: This concept crosses the density barrier, not limited to level three.
Q: (RS) Goes up to level four. That’s the means of propulsion of the UFO.
In other words, such engineering must take into account higher dimensions. Dr. Garry Nolan speculates that an advanced technology may be able to “project material objects” from a higher-dimensional space, in which case the driving force or propulsion mechanism may not reside in the craft itself, but in the higher dimension. Observers would see no evidence of a propulsion mechanism, because the craft would be controlled and powered from elsewhere. They would see only the 3D projection of a 4D object being moved from that space, similar to how a 2D disc of light on the wall is controlled by the 3D hand moving the flashlight.
Q: (RS) In our level three, does the use of anti-matter change the sign of the unit? Does this imply the reversal of the sign of the unit of space and time?
A: Yes, but problem has always been for level three-entities, that the “other” side is uncharted, therefore experimentation is not recommended, unless with assistance from level-four through -six STO.
Q: […] (RS) In Greece, at this time, at the University of Santia [there is no such university; perhaps he meant the University of Ioannina], the nuclear physics laboratory at the university, there is a potentially fundamental experiment going on based on my studies and this book here, to search for fundamentally new source of energy by bombarding zinc-70 or molybdenum-100 via Gamma with 1.294 MeV energy. […] Can these substances be new sources of energy?
A: All of the experiments you speak of share one thing in common: they all “touch the borderline” from the perspective of the third-density side.
June 7, 1997
Q: Now, let me read this text: “I have recently come into possession of a paper on magneto-gravitics and field resonance systems [“Prospects for a breakthrough in field-dependent ‘propulsion’”], presented by A.C. Holt from NASA Johnson Space Center to the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics’ 16th Joint Propulsion Conference, June 30-July 2, 1980. Holt presents a project using an already existing system known as the Coherent Field and Energy Resonance System (CoFERS) (probably located at Los Alamos Labs’ High Magnetic Field Research Laboratory). CoFERS utilizes a toroidal-shaped energy guide with megagauss magnetic field sources located along radius vectors equally spaced around the toroid. CoFERS is shaped like a thick flying disc.
“Holt goes on to say: ‘By converting an object’s normal space-time energy pattern to an energy pattern which differs substantially from the normal pattern, the gravitational forces acting on the object are changed. The object’s new pattern interacts with the surrounding space-time and virtual energy patterns, such that the interactive forces are substantially altered. The alteration of the characteristics of the continuous field of force results in the apparent motion of the object through space-time. […] Since the gravitational forces acting on the propulsion system can be quickly altered to achieve the desired motion, the spacecraft can make right-angle turns at very-high velocities without adversely affecting the crew or system elements. The effective gravitational field the spacecraft/aircraft experiences can be nearly simultaneously reoriented at a 90-degree angle, resulting in a smooth continuous motion as far as the occupants are concerned. […] The gravimagnetic system is perhaps best suited for use in and around … a large mass such as the Earth. While the gravimagnetic system is likely to be the first field-dependent propulsion system developed, the field resonance system will bring stellar and galactic travel out of the realm of science fiction. The field resonance system artificially generates an energy pattern which precisely matches or resonates with a virtual pattern associated with a distant space-time point. According to the model, if a fundamental or precise resonance is established (using hydromagnetic wave fine-tuning techniques), the spacecraft will be very strongly and equally repelled by surrounding virtual patterns. At the same time, through the virtual many-dimensional structure of space-time, a very strong attraction with the virtual pattern of a distant space-time point will exist. […] this combination of very strong forces will result in the translocation of the spacecraft from its initial position through the many-dimensional virtual structure to the distant space-time point. […] A space-time ‘jump’ already appears to be supported by astrophysical research.’”
Having read this text, my thought is that it is very similar to what I was talking about earlier today, and which was explicated by Karl von Eckartshausen in regards to the “violin allegory.” That is, that a violin string tuned to a particular pitch, if plucked, will cause the identical string on another violin across the room tuned to the same pitch to sound also. However, it seems that what they are doing here is setting up a “pitch” in this object which actually exists somewhere else. And, by creating this resonance, it “becomes” or disappears from this point in spacetime where its resonance is no longer appropriate, and reappears at the point in spacetime where the “tuned resonance” actually exists. It is both virtual and real. The question is: Is this text on the right track, and am I understanding it correctly?
A: Propulsion system for 3rd- and 4th-density alien spacecraft.
Q: That is the propulsion system?
A: Very close, yes.
Q: Is my understanding close to correct?
A: Well, that is a clever anecdotal parallel as it matches conceptually, which is really the point, isn’t it?
Q: […] Are you saying that the anecdote is more to the point than what this paper is saying?
A: In terms of consciousness, which is why everything exists ultimately, and with gravity as the “glue” that holds all on physical and ethereal planes together!
Q: Is the object to “dematerialize” or is the object to transpose something that is material to some other point in spacetime? I mean, when you collapse the gravity wave, is it necessarily that the object or person “dematerializes” or “disappears” from this point?
A: Break the veil of “time,” and dematerialization is no longer necessary, because one enters the realm of pure consciousness, where the illusion of physicality serves no longer, a purpose. [Recall the statement about the Denver UFO, that it entered and exited via a “time lock.”]
Q: Is it an issue for one to be able to retain internal coherence if one is no longer in a physical state?
A: Internal coherence can only be guaranteed in a purely non-physical “state.” And this state is really only a state of mind, anyway!!
Q: If one were to travel in this manner, would it not be a temptation to not return to the physical reality?
A: If one goes bowling, is it a temptation to not return to the parking lot?
Q: I guess if your only choice was the parking lot, I guess you would want to stay, but if going to the parking lot meant getting in your car and going home, then no. Now, glue. The thing is that one has to “unglue” oneself? Is that the point?
A: No.
Q: Well, if gravity is what holds material and ethereal existence together, and you are going from material into ethereal states…
A: By your definition, you would be unglued, since you perceive the physical, and thus are not completely stuck.
Q: So, you still have the ability to perceive the physical reality and the physical world when you are traveling this way, therefore you are not completely “stuck.” However, we have talked about people who do get completely “stuck,” is this correct?
A: Close. [See the reference to Flight 19 in volume 1.]
The author of the above paper, Alan Holt, later wrote another paper with AAWSAP scientists Hal Puthoff and Eric Davis on breakthrough propulsion physics.1 As part of AAWSAP’s “Project Physics,” Puthoff found a solution for Einstein’s general relativity equations to account for many of the “high strangeness” indicators associated with UFOs, including those regarding lift (e.g. flying circles around an airplane, high speed to hover to high-speed flight), propulsion (e.g. instant acceleration/stopping, abrupt directional changes), spatial/temporal translation (e.g. change shape and size, multiple craft merge into one) and power generation (e.g. blinding lights emitted by craft, creation of invisibility). His report for the program was published as “Advanced Space Propulsion Based on Vacuum (Spacetime Metric) Engineering.”
In Initial Revelations, Lacatski and Kelleher write of Puthoff’s work: “we take the data to constitute strong support for the hypothesis that (at least some) exotic propulsion is based on control and manipulation of the vacuum spacetime structure. Furthermore, independent of the specific mechanisms involved, such manipulation can be understood in terms of alteration/distortion of the spatial and temporal variables of the well-understood spacetime metric formalism.” Elizondo also describes this concept in Imminent. He quotes a discussion he had with Puthoff about it:
It seemed Hal had managed to find a unifying theory of sorts. Never did we consider the obvious question: “Were the observables all a product of a single technology?”
The answer seemed to be a resounding yes.
Hal explained that it turns out “if we had the right technology, we could warp space and time in a localized area, creating a localized ‘bubble’ around a craft.”
Inside the bubble, one would experience space and time differently than someone outside the bubble … like a diving bell, which protects a diver from the crushing depths around them.
Recall the statement that UFOs “carry a zone of 4D with them” (2024-3-9) and that this was said to account for the “zone of silence” or “Oz factor” associated with close encounters, features which Puthoff and his colleagues were attempting to account for.
January 22, 2000
Q: Now, we have this picture of this sort of “track” on the Moon here. It is 29 km long and about 1 km wide, and they are calling it a “landing strip.” Well, it’s pretty big to be a landing strip, in my opinion. What is it?
A: Residue of ancient mining operation.
Q: How ancient, by our calendar?
A: 350,000 years, approximately.
Q: In specific, how does this mark relate to a mining operation? Was it like strip mining, or where mining machines were driving back and forth, or what?
A: Underground channel mining.
Q: So, it is a depression caused by an underground mine. What was being mined?
A: Lignite and gold.
Lignite is brown coal, a combustible sedimentary rock formed from naturally compressed peat. As such, there is no evidence of its presence, now or in the past, on the Moon. However, there is a connection between Earth lignite and lunar regolith – the dust and rock on the Moon’s surface. In 1988 and as recent as 2024, researchers proposed using lignite coal ash to simulate lunar regolith for studying lunar construction techniques, as they contain many of the same silicates and oxides.
Q: Who was doing the mining?
A: [Orions, i.e. 4D STS, to be discussed in the next series.]
Q: What did they use this lignite and gold for?
A: Conduction of electromagnetism.
Q: Did they take this material out of our solar system to use elsewhere?
A: Some.
Q: (A) I don’t understand something here. These alchemists, who were not so clever as 4th density, were apparently able to produce gold. Now, these Orions who are so much more advanced, one would suppose, could not do transmutation, but needed to engage in mining? If they are so clever, why couldn’t they transmute iron to gold? Why did they have to mine the gold?
A: Have to? Not necessarily. Greed dictates that when it is there for the taking, do so. Does the counterfeiter walk away from a stash of cash?
In 2017, Terry Lovelace had an experience initiated by “Betty” (his longtime alien handler/liaison) in which he saw details of a 1987 abduction, shared in his book Incident at Devils Den. Finding himself aboard a massive ship approaching the Moon. As they got closer, he saw a “sprawling complex” of buildings, though no roads or vehicles:
She said the ship we were in was too large to land on the moon. She told me there were human beings living and working on the moon. […] I asked, “Human beings are living here? How long have we been here?” “For many decades,” she said matter-of-factly. She said they were “There to collect and process the rocks.”
In his second book, Devils Den: The Reckoning (2020), Lovelace shared additional details. The rocks were allegedly mined for helium-3, which is a rare and valuable isotope trapped in lunar regolith. It is a potential fuel for fusion reactors, where the resulting ionized plasma conducts electricity. The company Helion “uses strong electromagnetic fields to heat deuterium hydrogen and helium-3 gas into a doughnut-shaped plasma […] that generates its own electric field. […] This process drives the plasma’s temperature to more than 100 million degrees Celsius, releasing energy in the process as well as strengthening its own magnetic field.”
Betty also told Lovelace: “my people (hybrids) and my hosts (aliens) also reside here with humans on the surface. There are others that reside inside the moon below its surface.” She described those below the surface as “reptilian” and added that “the moon is a hollow, artificial vessel.” It was “manufactured a long time ago. Its original inhabitants abandoned it before the rise of mankind.” (See the references to Moon bases in volume 1.)
October 13, 2001
A: 4th density uses gold for technology.
Q: (BT) Well, that is in many myths about the “gods” mining gold in antiquity.
In his interview with Chris Ramsay for Area 52, Elizondo said:
There is a lot of information […] to suggest that uranium mines are a particular interest and other mines as well, believe it or not, gold. […] why gold? Not from a monetary perspective but what gold is, you know, gold is a very interesting metal, […] the reason why NASA and the Air Force use gold a lot on the inside of— […] I gotta be careful what I say here, but gold has some very interesting properties and there has been some information to suggest that UAP are interested in mining operations, both uranium and gold. […] Doesn’t mean it’s not the case, but […] I haven’t seen actually any extraction of minerals from the Earth.
He cites the 1952 case of UFOs sighted above uranium mines in the Congo, described in declassified CIA documents. Ramsay points out that the alleged 4chan whistleblower said: “They consistently mine gold.”
In Dominion Lost, Dr. Bruce Rapuano discusses some of the properties of gold in the context of a retrieved nasal implant composed of 51% silver and 49% gold. At least when combined with silver, scientists have been able “to design metamaterials with unusual properties” matching the composition of the implant (recovered 10-20 years prior to the scientific discoveries).
As diamagnetic metals, gold and silver already have a small negative magnetic permeability. Yet the surfaces of the gold and sliver spheres could have been straightforwardly fabricated to create surface nanostructures of various shapes that transform the metals into metamaterials with stronger negative magnetic permeabilities. [“Conduction of electromagnetism”?]
Four years earlier, the C’s had said: “Gold, when heated to its liquidation [sic] temperature, gives off energy waves which, when properly channeled, open the door to higher-density experience. Clue to this is in the way that gold can be an effective transceiver of radio waves and transdimensional communications” (1997-7-5).
September 14, 2002
Q: (Ark) Well, let’s first try to ask about this Polish guy [Jan] Pajak who, in the 80s, had a plan for what he calls magnocraft, a propulsion system for UFOs. Later, he improved it, and has a supporter. But there are some strange phenomena around him recently, especially after he was contacted by a woman who is a former Miss Italy. She received some kind of communication for plans to build telepathic pyramids…
A: Co-opted so as not to get any closer.
Q: (Ark) Can his machine propulsion – his magnocraft – be made to work?
A: Not as published.
September 28, 2002
Q: (Ark) I am reading one of the books [Advanced Magnetic Propulsion Systems] by the Polish engineer Pajak, written in 1990, where he describes a UFO propulsion system. He claims that he has discovered a “periodic principle” where inventions come like the periodic table, and he says it is now time to discover this UFO propulsion system. So much that he says seems to “fit.” He gives many good ideas, but generally for the wrong reasons. Are his main ideas sound? Is it true that UFOs are using the machinery that he describes?
A: His primary block is his lack of knowledge of hyperdimensional physics.
Q: (Ark) That is true. But to build such a thing, we need to use 3D technology, because that is what we have. We cannot use 4D technology, because we don’t have access to 4D tools, so what can we do?
A: You will.
Q: (Ark) Question is whether Pajak’s 3D technology that he describes corresponds to what it really is?
A: Generally speaking, more or less. But so much is lacking that, as designed, the prototypes will do nothing.
Q: (Ark) Has his idea been taken from him and successfully implemented by others – say, military?
A: No need. Only objective there is to prevent his further discoveries.
This has arguably been the strategy of the black world at least since the 1950s. Aviation journalist and author Nick Cook, for example, believes it likely that antigravity research “went black” post-1957, after which public discussion on the subject of the search for antigravity ceased abruptly. Jesse Michels argues this was also the case with Thomas Townsend Brown’s work on electrogravitics – that a breakthrough probably occurred, at which point the entire field of inquiry was classified.
Aerospace scientist Amy Eskridge suggested that this process is still in use today. First, she was told by a dubious source (Dan Cooper) that “what is colloquially but inaccurately called antigravity” has been independently discovered by five separate people, and was suppressed each time. (Cooper told her three: Nikola Tesla, Amy’s father Richard Eskridge and allegedly Cooper himself. She speculated the other two were Eugene Podkletnov and Ken Wheeler, though Thomas Townsend Brown is also a likely candidate.) Second, she alleges that some scientists, like Martin Tajmar, are incentivized (in Tajmar’s case, by the German Air Force) to publish null results for antigravity research in their public work. (Some believe Eskridge, who committed suicide in 2022, was murdered because of her own work on antigravity.)
Q: (Ark) His ideas are quite original, so I wonder where he is getting them?
A: Not so original, just logical. Only reason others don’t “get” such ideas is because they cannot think logically due to hypnosis. […]
Q: (Ark) Are UFOs also made by thoughts?
A: Everything is.
Q: (Ark) But some thoughts we call material, like this cup, which is material. And then there is technology to build this cup. […] (L) Will an ozone generator prevent UFOs from hanging around?
A: If it did, it would also prevent you from “being around”.
Q: (L) What about some of these UFO detectors this guy Pajak has talked about?
A: Most of that is nonsense. UFOs can easily overcome any such devices.
UFO technology in general – not just propulsion – seems to be intimately tied with consciousness, as implied by the use of the phrase “thought-form projection” by both Ra and the C’s. The phrase implies that the craft itself is a projection of consciousnesses, a materialized thought more like a direct expression of superpsi (as philosopher Stephen E. Braude calls it) than something produced in a factory. This may partially explain the great variety of shapes and individual variations of UAP, as well as their seeming ability to take on any form, including the “seamless” feature noted so frequently by witnesses (including Lazar).
Meade Layne, mentioned further above, first proposed this idea in the 1950s as a result of a trance channeling experiment with the medium Mark Probert (among others). In 1950 he described the concept of thought-forms like this:
Now the skilled occultist […] makes a thought‐form of himself, or projects his consciousness which takes on a form; and this form may be and often is visible and tangible at some distant place. […] he can make an object (say a Flying Disc) out of mental matter, mind‐stuff […] His thought materializes in mental matter, then subsequently in etheric matter, finally in matter as is known to our senses […]
The C’s described the creation of thought-forms in volume 1, saying the process involves opening a portal (by inducing an EM field): “Next, thoughts must be channelled by participant in order to access reality-bonding channel. They must then focus the energy to the proper dimensional bridge. The electrons must be arranged in correct frequency wave. Then the triage [matter, energy, perception of reality] must be sent through realm ‘curtain’ in order to balance perceptions at all density levels.”
December 29, 2018
A: Recall that 4D is a realm where thought has the power to create. If a mind, and here we mean much more than you understand as mind, thinks about a structure or something that needs to be accomplished, it assembles itself, more or less.
Layne continues:
In a sense, a Flying Saucer or any object made in this way is alive. It is in‐formed by the mind‐life of its maker. It is a kind of extension of the parent mind […] once inside the earth’s atmosphere this materialized craft begins to employ means of propulsion; and if it chances to come to a forced landing (?) we find it has an extremely hard metallic shell. Further, there are those little people whose bodies are found inside.
In The Ether Ship and Its Solution (1950), Layne wrote:
The aeroforms [UFOs] are thought-constructs, mind constructs. As such, they are, in effect, the vehicle of the actual entity who creates them. Just as our own terrestrial minds rule and become identified with our bodies, so does the entity of the Etheric world make for himself a body or vehicle out of etheric substance. […] The impenetrable steel of landed discs is, as it were, a sort of etheric isotope of our terrestrial steel, or we may call it “etheric steel.” The shapes and vehicles and the entity operating them form one being, just as a human being is a psychophysical mind-body unity.
This is what Grant Cameron’s “sky pilots” report: that once the connection is made, piloting the craft is akin to moving one’s limbs – it becomes an extension of the body.
In 1955, Layne expanded on this idea:
The Aeroforms (flying discs, etc.) are for the most part EMERGENTS; that is, they emerge onto our plane of perception from a space-time frame of reference which is different from our own. […] It appears to be and definitely is what we call solid substance, and so remains until the vibratory rate is again converted. […] Etheric matter […] is subject to the play of many subtle forces, including the energic activity of thought. Any form or object of which the mind can conceive can be brought into existence by mental action, and controlled by the same means. Etheric objects are in every way as “real” as those of our own world. […]
The foregoing paragraph also applies to the bodies of Etherian people. […] The Etherian [or “4-D”] makes his own body […] and makes it in any size and form he chooses. By the same principle, he can produce the form of a sphere, a cylinder, a cube, a disc or ‘saucer’ […] The ‘vehicle’ of an Etherian (whether his body or his ‘ship’) is thus essentially a thought-form […] The Etherians make use of machines and apparatus, but these also are etheric constructs. When the ‘ship’ is completed, it is placed by mental means (‘teleportation’) in any desired location [Recall what the C’s said above: that “dematerialization is no longer necessary, because one enters the realm of pure consciousness”].
And as we will see in the next series, something similar to this concept may apply particularly well to at least one alien “species” described in the UFO literature.
Scientific Works on UFOs/UAP and Technology
Edward J. Ruppelt: The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects (1956)
Jacques F. Vallée: Anatomy of a Phenomenon: Unidentified Objects in Space – A Scientific Appraisal (1965)
Jacques & Janine Vallée: Challenge to Science: The UFO Enigma (1966)
Edward U. Condon, Daniel S. Gillmor: Final Report of the Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects (1968)
David R. Saunders, R. Roger Harkins: UFO’s? Yes! Where the Condon Committee Went Wrong (1968)
J. Allen Hynek: The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry (1972)
J. Allen Hynek, Jacques F. Vallée: The Edge of Reality: A Progress Report on Unidentified Flying Objects (1975)
Harley D. Rutledge: Project Identification: The First Scientific Field Study of UFO Phenomena (1982)
Jacques F. Vallée: Forbidden Science Volumes 1-6 (1993-2025)
Paul R. Hill: Unconventional Flying Objects: A Former NASA Scientist Explains How UFOs Really Work (1995)
Peter A. Sturrock: The UFO Enigma: A New Review of the Physical Evidence (1999)
Ann Druffel: Firestorm: Dr. James E. McDonald’s Fight for UFO Science (2003)
Michael D. Swords: Grassroots UFOs: Case Reports from the Center for UFO Studies (2014)
James T. Lacatski, Colm A. Kelleher, George Knapp: Skinwalkers at the Pentagon: An Insiders’ Account of the Secret Government UFO Program (2021)
James T. Lacatski, Colm A. Kelleher, George Knapp: Inside the U.S. Government Covert UFO Program: Initial Revelations (2023)
Robert Powell: UFOs: A Scientist Explains What We Know (And Don’t Know) (2024)
Luis Elizondo: Imminent: Inside the Pentagon’s Hunt for UFO’s (2024)
Kevin H. Knuth et al.: “The New Science of Unidentified Aerospace-Undersea Phenomena (UAP)” (2025)
Next: NHI/Alien Races Part 1: The Orion Union, Nordics
Holt was also briefly the first administrator of BAASS AAWSAP.
It says in the December 29, 2018 session:
“A: Recall that 4D is a realm where thought has the power to create. If a mind, and here we mean much more than you understand as mind, thinks about a structure or something that needs to be accomplished, it assembles itself, more or less.”
Really? And that’s why 4D STS still go digging in mines looking for gold…because they have faulty ‘minds’?
It said in an excerpt earlier:
“He cites the 1952 case of UFOs sighted above uranium mines in the Congo, described in declassified CIA documents. Ramsay points out that the alleged 4chan whistleblower said: “They consistently mine gold.””
You know what else I'm wondering?
If, like the C's have said, you ASK 4D STO for help when you need it, and they'll be able to give it to you, because they can't intrude on you like STS do, so you ask them for help. Great. We've been asking for a long time. They must be deaf. Because I haven't received any of the help I need. Is that like the checker board with the black and white squares, or the Chinese Yin/Yang symbol with a dot of black and a dot of white on each side? Maybe they're too busy playing chess games to hear us, to help out?
If thought has SO much power over there, couldn't they at least send us a blessing in a thought?
If like the C's said, there is more STO's than there are STS, then what is the hold up for showing some decency here? You would think there is 80 percent STS around that the STO's can't get through to assist us when we need them.
Or are those STO's working right along with the STS in eking out as much suffering as they can for the food supply they eat over there? Didn't they say that it's a balance, like yin-yang, and they work together? What static then it is. Where is the courage of the STO's? Or is it just a religion that was taught to the cosmos in this galaxy (and perhaps others) in order to keep everyone under the control of the king pin?
Are not those parents, the STO and STS, a bit dysfunctional...when they can't even assist the children below them when they ask? And I'm not asking for sugar or sweets, just necessity. Anyone else find the same?