Recent Session Updates
Window-fallers, Missing 411 and cattle mutilations
July 6, 2024
Q: (Ben) In October, 2023, a swab was taken from a sheep carcass found in the UK and it was analyzed. A large black animal had been witnessed near the carcass. A DNA sequence almost identical to one in leopards was found. Was this a genuine finding of material from a leopard feeding on the carcass?
A: Close.
Q: (Ben) Are the many reports of “big black cats” in the UK sightings of window-fallers?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So that’s why it’s close. It’s not... (Joe) Are there some actual panthers or leopards roaming around in the UK for a number of years?
A: No.
Q: (L) So all of them are window-fallers?
A: Yes.
Q: (Andromeda) And they’re able to leave traces of DNA, I guess.
A: Yes.
Q: (Andromeda) That’s interesting.
A: They are temporarily “real”.
Q: (Joe) And they have the same DNA as big cats from 3D.
A: Close.
Two authors who make a case for the supernatural status of the mystery big cats are Merrily Harpur and Nick Redfern:
Nick Redfern: Three Men Seeking Monsters: Six Weeks in Pursuit of Werewolves, Lake Monsters, Giant Cats, Ghostly Devil Dogs, and Ape-Men (2004)
Merrily Harpur: Mystery Big Cats (2021)
The phenomenon isn’t limited solely to the UK, however. See, for example, Shadow Cats: The Black Panthers of North America (2018) by Michael Mayes.
Q: (Approaching Infinity) In 2015, in the context of Missing 411 cases, you said that berries were “convenient markers for TDARM-type technology due to sound frequency.” In the last session, however, you said TDARM tech wasn’t used in physical abductions. Since Missing 411 involve the permanent physical removal of the victim, what is the “TDARM-type tech” used in these cases and for what purpose? (L) OK, well first of all, I don’t think all Missing 411 cases involve the permanent physical removal of the victim. Approaching Infinity? (Approaching Infinity) It’s the vast majority, but correct. (L) OK, so the vast majority are just disappearing, gone forever. (Approaching Infinity) Yeah. (L) OK. But a lot of them are returned. OK. So what is the TDARM-type tech used in these cases and for what purpose? OK, wait a minute, now... There’s something else here. You said TDARM tech wasn’t used in physical abductions.
A: Physical abductions are not necessarily the same as 411 cases. Physical abductions were discussed in the context of “alien abductions.” 411-type cases are often done for different reasons. There is a certain element of opportunism present in the latter. In the former, there is usually a specific targeting and a purpose.
Q: (L) OK. So, in alien abductions, they usually target somebody and the various elements of an alien abduction come into play where the person is compelled to do something or feels something or whatever, and they are taken, I guess. In the 411 cases... (Andromeda) And usually returned. (L) Well, we’re talking about the ones where they’re actually physically abducted and not returned. (Andromeda) Right. OK. (L) And in the 411 cases there’s opportunism. (Chu) Like all the people running in a specific place or... (Scottie) Yeah, the people who go off into the wilderness are making themselves targets. (L) OK. Does that have anything to do with, I mean the opportunistic nature of it has something to do with the whole berry bush element... (Andromeda) Or certain other themes like being near water or in certain places or of a certain disability... (Niall) Or certain genetic heritage. (Andromeda) Yeah. One time it was athletic people, or Germans, or... (L) And so those elements relate to the technological aspect of it, is that correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Whereas none of those things need to be present for a strictly targeted alien abduction. Is that correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So then he wants to know: What is the TDARM-type tech used in these cases?
A: Do you have a week or so? And the ability to evade abduction yourself?
Q: (L) In other words, don’t ask that question. (L) If we said we had a week or so, would you tell us?
A: No.
Q: (Scottie) Well, they could have just said like, “the Abduct-o-Matic 9000” or something... [laughter] (L) The Abduct-o-Matic 9000?! Where do you guys come up with this? [laughter] (Andromeda) With certain settings. (Niall) Maybe Scottie just got that from the C’s... (L) Now they’re going to abduct you. They’re coming after you, Scottie! (Approaching Infinity) Laura, I’ve got just a comment on that because I like the response, but that wasn’t entirely what I was interested in. I'm just wondering... because the way TDARM tech has been described in the context of abductions is that they basically pull out your soul imprint and then remolecularize a body in 4D, and then demolecularize it and put the soul imprint back. I was initially wondering if the TDARM was basically used to demolecularize an actual physical body and take it away, or if there’s another purpose to it? (L) Well then ask that question. Is a TDARM-type tech—can it be used to demolecularize a living human body and remove it?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And is that why they have such odd leavings at some of the sites, because the body has been kind of demolecularized out of its clothes or something?
A: Yes.
Q: (Andromeda) Settings weren’t perfect. [laughter] (L) I tell you, it just gets deeper and deeper. OK. Are you happy, Approaching Infinity? (Approaching Infinity) Yes. (Joe) Do you have the ability to evade abduction yourself? (Approaching Infinity) Um, we’ll see... [laughter] (L) Don’t go wandering in the woods near berry bushes. […]
Q: (L) OK, next, Joe and Niall might have questions about Michael Mosley. Who’s Michael Mosley? (Joe) Remember that famous UK TV doctor who was in the Greek islands who went missing? […] (L) Yeah. And then he disappeared and then he was found someplace... (Joe) On a very small Greek island with few trees. He disappeared for five days and then was found dead five days later. (Niall) In a place they searched multiple times... (Joe) Right next to a holiday resort! Has all the hallmarks of Missing 411, but we just want to check. (L) Is this one of these 411 cases?
A: Yes.
Q: (Joe) And it was just opportunistic?
A: Yes.
Q: (Joe) So the fact that he was a famous TV doctor had no bearing on the event?
A: No.
Q: (Approaching Infinity) What is it about the flesh of mutilated animals that makes predators avoid eating it and in some cases for the flesh to not decompose for a very long time?
A: The presence of a time lock of 4D that is a side effect of the event.
Q: (Joe) So if there was a 4D bleedthrough, like they mentioned in the last session about those sheep and stuff, where a section of 4D comes and then, if that were to happen and someone here was viewing it or was there in the area, would they see those sheep for example, or whatever was in that 4D bleedthrough area? Would people still be able to see it or does it disappear from their vision?
A: Some would see, but most would not.
Q: (L) Is that because of the time-lock element, that it locks the time and there’s a skip, and then time starts again and the people viewing don’t see anything because it happened in that skip?
A: Yes.
Q: (Andromeda) So it sounds like the time lock doesn’t work on some?
A: Yes. […]
Q: (Ryan) Does this technology work by the fourth or fifth dimensions without affecting the three main spatial ones?
A: Close.
“Time locks” will also be covered in an upcoming installment of the current series on alien abduction.
Listened to you on Higherside Chats. I kept pausing it to think and people would talk to me at work and I'd have to back it up. Being a STO you are essentially being an STS, that made me think oh, and of course. The All blinks at neither the light nor the darkness. Yes love that. It was very good though thanks for everything your doing. I guess this is Harrison, fuckin awesome man wow, truly amazing work. Thank you Laura I really enjoyed listening to you. Thank you to the whole team. take care