Cattle Mutilations

Non-human intelligence nutrition and bidirectional mimicry

Feb 13, 2024

Reports of strange animal deaths, disappearances, and mutilations go back at least to the early 1600s. However, detailed reports first began appearing only in 1967 with the “Snippy” case, so it is difficult to know if earlier reports described the same phenomenon. Those early reports often described animals which had been mysteriously exsanguinated, sometimes with patches of skin and organs removed. The modern accounts (usually cattle) add several additional details that distinguish them from possible predator and scavenger activity, including that of humans. These include (culled from Christopher O’Brien’s 2014 book Stalking the Herd):

blood almost or completely missing from carcass, with little or no sign of blood on the wounds, ground, or anywhere else; what blood sometimes remains (e.g. in the heart) may not clot properly
excisions of hide, flesh, and organs with remarkable surgical precision, often in circular or square cuts, which veterinarians find difficult or impossible to replicate
typical removals include: the eye, ear, lip, tongue, rectum, genitals (in whole or part), udder, teeth, and various internal organs, including the brain and spinal column; internal organs are sometimes removed through a circular hole (e.g. intestines removed through a hole in the scrotum)
when exterior parts like the udder are removed, the underlying tissues are undamaged; unborn calves are sometimes removed without damaging the placental bag; sometimes ears and eyes are removed from the side touching the ground, ruling out scavengers
parts like the rectum are often “cored out,” as if a large circular or cylindrical instrument were used to remove a segment of the animal several inches deep, or removed with an ice-cream scoop
when skin and muscle are removed to the bone (such as around a leg segment, or on the side of the face and mouth), the bones appear clean and bleached white, as if they had been exposed to the sun for a long period
cuts are cauterized, showing signs of a high-heat source; carcasses sometimes have burn marks; the rare cut shows a serrated edge; sometimes hair falls off or is easily removed around the wound
pure, dried hemoglobin has been found on some of the carcasses (and pneumonia in the lungs); the hemoglobin was still active with all other components removed
tail hair is sometimes removed and artfully arranged nearby or around the carcass
other farm animals and scavengers (like coyotes) avoid the carcass, which can take longer than usual to decay (sometimes months), or do so rapidly; cattle herds sometimes exhibit strange behavior, such as circling the carcass
no footprints are found around the carcass, or signs of struggle; carcasses are often found in hard-to-reach areas of pasture
some show signs of having been dropped from the air, such as broken branches above, or broken bones such as legs or spine
mutilations are performed in a short amount of time and covertly; one at Skinwalker Ranch occurred in a window of 30 to 40 minutes, while the farmer was in the same pasture but not looking in that direction
unexplained substances, e.g. a cobweb-like, filmy white substance analyzed to be a petroleum product; liquid shown to be completely sterile and non-organic
either before, during, or after the time of the mutilation, there are often sightings of UAP (anomalous lights, structured craft), most commonly mystery helicopters, at least some of which are anomalous (e.g. silent or making sounds not typical of actual helicopters, like humming, whistling or whooshing), and humanoid cryptids (Bigfoot, men in hoods, robes, masks, or other strange clothing who glide or leap anomalously)

Video footage from Christopher O’Brien:

The phenomenon peaked in 1975 (the same year the cattle population peaked in the U.S.), but has continued since. While animal mutilations occur worldwide, cattle mutilations are limited to Christian countries, and while cattle are most predominant in those nations, the phenomenon has occurred with most species (e.g. all varieties of farm animal, elk, deer, bison, caribou, dogs, house cats, etc.). The areas most affected are often found near sites dealing with nuclear energy in some way (launch sites, plants, mines), including air force bases.

Some recurring features do suggest human involvement in at least some of the cases, including:

substances found within the body, such as nicotine sulfate, chlorpromazine, coagulants, anticoagulants, etc.
apparent bullet wounds (though sometimes bullets cannot be found)
objects left near the scene, some of which seem to have been deliberately placed, e.g. scalpels, gloves, cigarette butts, sand within the body cavity, radar chaff
cuts described as made with a sharp object, but sloppy in comparison
the presence of actual helicopters

This leads some researchers to believe that at least some mutilations are copycat attacks, perhaps using the real phenomenon as cover, and perhaps for biological experiments.

There are several theories for the mutilation phenomenon, none of which accounts for all the evidence on its own. These range from scavengers, human cults, private or government/military agents, cryptids, to a non-human intelligence (UFOs/aliens). The Cassiopaean transcripts suggest that all of these may be true, to one degree or another.

January 21, 1995

Q: (L) Back in the 1970’s in the central United States there were quite a number of cases of animal mutilation. There has been a lot of publicity about this at some point and then it died down and was covered up, and there were a lot of ideas and theories about it. What I would like to know is, who was doing the animal mutilations?
A: Many.
Q: OK, who was doing most of the animal mutilations?
A: Not applicable.
Q: OK. Was some of the animal mutilation done by the U.S. government, or entities within the government?
A: Was?
Q: (L) In other words, it is still going on. So OK, so they are still doing it. Was, or is, some of this activity being conducted by alien individuals?
A: Yes.

The association between aliens and cattle mutilation has been there since 1967, mostly due to the extraordinary precision of the procedures seemingly utilizing highly advanced technology, the sense of mystery surrounding the phenomenon, and sightings of UFOs near some of the mutilation sites. Many ufologists were initially highly reluctant to accept an association between the two phenomena, some of them (like J. Allen Hynek and APRO) even relying on a leaked government investigation blaming the whole thing on satanists. The case for a significant link between them was best argued by Linda Moulton Howe in her 1989 book Alien Harvest. (See one farmer’s account here of two aliens carrying a calf here.)

In addition to the correlation between UFO sightings and mutilations, there are two other types of supporting evidence: witness accounts of UFOs interacting with large game, and abduction accounts. For the former, the most cited account involves an elk being lifted and transported by a UFO (Cascade Mountains, February 25, 1999). The latter include several cases such as those cited by Linda Howe in her books (e.g. Judy Doraty, Cindy Tindle, and Timothy Fint), in which the abductees witness cattle entering craft via a beam of light, and/or being mutilated/dissected onboard. Another is the Myrna Hansen case, researched by APRO investigator Paul Bennewitz. Timothy Good cites another in Alien Base (1998). The witness, in Puerto Rico, reported: “A blue-green conical beam of light came down from the craft and engulfed two of the cows, one of which was levitated towards the craft. The cow vanished suddenly when it was about five feet from the underside. Then the craft began to move away slowly.”

A possible third type of evidence is provided by government whistleblowers like Philip J. Corso, who claimed such a link was accepted in military/intelligence circles (described in more detail below).

Q: (T) Were they acting for the same reasons?
A: No.
Q: Why did the government do animal mutilations?
A: Copy, in order to throw off investigation.

Dr. Colm Kelleher of NIDS and AAWSAP calls this “bidirectional mimicry”:

Here we have a phenomenon that began, we think, in the 1950s. … So here we have a phenomenon that’s “genuine,” but at the same time we’re finding these occasional cases where it’s pretty obvious that somebody is using sedatives, is using hypodermic needles, and is using medical equipment to exsanguinate animals, so we postulated that there were two things going on simultaneously that were causing a lot of confusion. You’ve got 1) a “genuine” phenomenon and 2) you’ve got this medical surveillance project that has been carried out knowing that most veterinarians will not touch a mutilated animal because the “aliens” are associated with mutilated animals. So these small covert surveillance programs … are being carried out knowing that the overall umbrella of cattle mutilations is protecting the perpetrators from being caught.
So that’s the bi-directional mimicry, where you’ve got the “real” phenomenon, you’ve got a small program that’s hiding underneath the phenomenon, and then you’ve got the phenomenon that’s actually mimicking the government surveillance program. … the problem is that you’re looking at cattle mutilations through the lens of two layers of deception. So you’ve got the layer of deception from the phenomenon, you’ve also got the layer of deception from the government program that is using cattle mutilations as a cover for a surveillance effort. … It’s very very difficult for an outsider coming into this to penetrate those two layers of deception.

Q: (L) So they copied this activity to throw off investigations. Did they do this as an act to protect the aliens who were doing animal mutilations for their own purposes?
A: No.
Q: (L) Were they doing it to protect themselves from the public knowing that they were engaged in alien interactions?
A: They do it to protect the public from knowing that which would explode society if discovered.
Q: (L) What is this item that they were protecting so that society or the public wouldn’t know about it? What activity is this?
A: Humans eat cattle, aliens eat you.

Similar reasons for the cover-up have been shared recently by prominent figures in ufology. In response to a question about “alleged injuries or deaths at the hands of UFOs and their occupants,” and whether these were accidental/incidental or intentional, journalist Ross Coulthart responded (2023): “I’m sorry to upset anybody out there, but ... no, I’m ... And I remember this moment very clearly in my conversation with David Grusch, and also with other people. No, I’m talking here about malevolence. I’m talking here about deliberately targeted attacks by, you know, alleged non-human intelligences that weren’t accidental. They were deliberate acts of murder, killing, and mutilation.”

On the Joe Rogan Experience (2023), journalist George Knapp said: “What could be so terrible that they can’t tell us about it? Let’s say, these aliens, wherever they’re from, made us, that we’re a genetic experiment. That they created our religions, our religious figures. That we are an agricultural product, that somehow they harvest us.”

Dr. Garry Nolan (2022): “Maybe there’s something about them that’s really scary...to know that we are somebody else’s property. Or, heaven help, maybe we’re farmed for something? That would be awful, that would be icky. I mean, it isn’t as if we don't farm things. Just to know you’re not the top of the food chain, might not be a pleasant thing.”

Dr. Diana Walsh Pasulka (2023): “I didn’t come into the study of the field with a preconceived notion of whether extraterrestrials were good or bad. I didn’t believe, so the interpretations didn’t matter to me. As I went through the years interviewing and working with scientists who study this topic, I came away very disturbed, as there seems to be a lot within these experiences that one would call unsavory. And worse.”

Dr. Eric Davis (2019): “UFOs have not been benevolent. It’s all been just hide and seek, hide and seek. ‘We’ll use stealth as much as possible so that humans don’t see us in the environment. And then when we want to expose ourselves, we expose ourselves, do our little fun games and then take off.’ They may be testing our technology.”

David Grusch (2023): “We also have ‘biologics,’ meaning bodies, whose characteristics Grusch isn’t free to specify though he hints that these come in different shapes and sizes. Finally, he learned that these beings may not be friendly. ‘Indifferent to us at best,’ he says. He also suggests they belong to groups or species which may, in some cases, dislike each other.”

Jim Semivan (2023): “What if we also know that aliens are not our friends, that they can control us whenever they want to do so, that we are indeed property and that we have absolutely no defenses against this? That is, I think, the ultimate dilemma for the USG and other nations. You can’t disclose just part of the story.”

Tom DeLonge (2017): “Are people really ready to understand and admit to themselves that we are not completely in control, like we think we are? When you find out what’s really been going on for thousands of years and you realize ‘Holy cow, someone owns us!’ and there might actually be more than one and they don't like each other, and we might be the victims of a proxy war... It’s a big deal! That’s why we’re taking the time to roll this out over several years.”

Tucker Carlson (2023): “If you talk to people who have actual knowledge of it, that they gathered themselves, there are parts of that story that … are really, really, really dark, and so dark that I haven’t told my wife about it. … Part of [why it isn’t front-page news] is that the public can’t deal with it. It’s too far out. The implications are too profound. Because I’ve heard things that I’m just like, ‘Oh man, I don’t even really want to know that.’ … The justification [to not disclose] one often hears is … because it would scare people … but I do think there’s a sense in which that’s not totally crazy. Like there is some stuff, if it’s true and I’m kind of thinking it may be true, that’s so radical that … we don’t want to tell the people we love most about it because, why would you disturb someone like that. So I kind of get that, I hate to admit it.”

Q: (T) They’ve said that before. (L) OK, yeah, we eat second-level, they eat third. Did aliens do some of the cattle mutilations?
A: Yes.
Q: What do aliens do to cattle?
A: Blood.
Q: (L) They take the blood out of them?
A: Yes.
Q: (J) They drink it? What do they use this blood for?
A: Nourishment.
Q: (L) OK, but you just said that aliens eat humans, and humans eat cattle. Why were the aliens being nourished by cattle, if that’s not their normal bill of fare? (J) Delicacy. (T) A cow’s blood is a lot like human blood.
A: Do you not ever consume facsimile?
Q: (T) Hamburger Helper? Shake and Bake. (J) And I helped! (laughter) Sorry!
A: Facsimile is less controversial, obviously!
Q: (L) So in other words, they were eating cattle just to keep from having to eat so many humans. That would have just upset people a lot, is that it? Oh God.
A: Yes.

John Keel was probably the first ufologist to take this idea seriously. In Disneyland of the Gods (1988), he wrote:

In innumerable Men in Black cases, witnesses have claimed they felt a numbness or paralysis when confronted by the strange MIBs. In Middle Europe these black-garbed mystery men were once thought to be evil vampires. Legend has it that they first paralyzed their victims with a hypnotic stare and then drank their blood. Could these legends be based on fact? Fortunately, there have been no verifiable cases of vampirism in modern times, but there are a great many disappearances of people every year, and we might speculate that the modern vampires are now clever enough to hide or bury the incriminating evidence. Or perhaps they have turned their bloodthirsty practices to animals, because killing human beings has become too difficult and too involved. All of this revives one of Ivan Sanderson’s more chilling theories: That the Earth is a farm and we are the crop. Do UFOs raid us frequently to satisfy their thirst for blood, operating behind a smoke screen of deception and confusion? … Obviously, someone or some thing needs enormous quantities of animal and human blood, and we have been furnishing it for hundreds of years.

Aside from Keel, John Lear suggested something similar in 1987 (see more on this below). Lt. Col. Corso later suggested the same thing in his 1997 book with William J. Birnes, The Day After Roswell, writing: “But it wasn’t the Soviets who were going after our cattle. … It was the EBEs who were experimenting with organ harvesting, possibly for transplant into other species or for processing into some sort of nutrient package or even to create some sort of hybrid biological entity.” According to Corso, although the first publicized cases only made the news in 1967, the UFO “working group” was aware of the phenomenon as early as the mid 1950s (which Kelleher also suggests above). Oscar Wayne Wolff (Army Signal Corps), who claimed not to have read Corso’s book, told something similar to Linda Howe in 1998: that he was aware of mutilation reports in the period of 1957-1960 during his work on a CIA project.

Q: (T) So, since they’re eating cattle instead of humans, does that mean they’ll stop eating humans? (L) Terry, you know better than that! (T) Well, it’s the next logical question.
A: Some of their human “food” is merely emotions, think of flesh as being the equal of “filet mignon.”

Corso also suggested something like this in 1997: “We didn’t know their reasons back in the 1950s and 1960s and can only make educated guesses about them now, but back then we were driven by a terror that unless we found ways to defend ourselves against the EBEs we would be corralled by them and used for replacement tissue or as a source of nutrition.”

Q: (T) OK, when we’re talking about these aliens, are we talking about the Grays?
A: No.
Q: (T) We’re talking about the Lizards.
A: Yes.
Q: (T) OK, what do the Grays feed on?
A: Plasma.
Q: (T) OK, the Grays feed on plasma, blood plasmas of some kind, is this what you are saying?
A: Yes.

As noted above, pure hemoglobin residues have been found on some mutilated cattle. An analysis of hemoglobin by chemist P.A. Budinger for biophysicist W.C. Levengood and Linda Howe concluded that the hemoglobin’s “presence suggests a processing of the whole blood has occurred at the excision site. … [The usual procedure for doing this] involves separating red blood corpuscles from the lighter plasma components by centrifugation. … Another centrifugation removes the ruptured cell envelopes and leaves a clear red solution of hemoglobin.”

Q: (T) OK, so that’s why they want the blood. So, do the Grays feed on emotions?
A: No. […] They send them to Lizards.
Q: (T) The Grays send emotions to the Lizards? They’re transmitters?
A: Transfer energy through technology.
Q: […] (T) Are the cattle giving off enough emotion for the Grays to feed this to the Lizards also?
A: No. That is physical only, you see, Lizards and Grays only need physical nourishment while “visiting” 3rd level, not when in natural realm, 4th density, there they feed on emotions only.
Q: (T) Grays are not strictly third density? Because they’ve been created by the Lizzies?
A: Yes. Correct, they too are 4th level.
Q: (L) […] What technology do they use to surgically excise certain areas of the cattle’s anatomy? Is this done by laser…
A: Laser-like.

According to Iona Hoeppner, who analyzed a mutilation in 1980: “I did careful microscopic exams on the tissue cut from the belly. It was not a cut, not a laser burn. No cell was destroyed. It (the incision) was separated between the cells, cell for cell. No cell was disrupted in the mutilator’s cut. There is nothing that I know of that could do such a thing.” In 1998, David Perkins cited a surgical pathologist who found “evidence of heat cautery artifact and ‘blistering’ of the epidermis at the edge of the tissue”; an Oregon State University lab in 1991 that found “a band of coagulation necrosis consistent with a heat-induced incision, such as an electro-surgical unit”; and Dr. John Altshuler in Denver, who concluded the cutting was done with “high heat as in laser surgery … probably above 300 degrees F.” (Quoted by O’Brien.)

George Knapp reports on Cattle Mutilations for 8 News Now.

In 1997, Corso wrote: “There was a written description and a sketch of another device, too, like a short, stubby flashlight almost with a self-contained power source that was nothing at all like a battery. The scientists at Wright Field … played with this device a lot before they realized that it was an alien cutting device like a blowtorch. One time they floated some smoke across the light and suddenly the whole beam took shape. What had been invisible suddenly had a round, micro thin, tunnel-like shape to it. Why did the inhabitants of this craft have a cutting device like this aboard their ship? It wasn’t until later, when I read military reports of cattle mutilations in which entire organs were removed without any visible trauma to the surrounding cell tissue, that I realized that the light beam cutting torch I thought was in the Roswell file was actually a surgical implement, just like a scalpel, that was being used by the aliens in medical experiments on our livestock.” Here is Corso discussing this aspect in 1996:

Q: (L) OK, since it has been noted that quite frequently the cattle mutilations consist of taking very specific parts of the body, such as the eyeballs, the genitalia; they core out the anal sphincter right up to the colon; what would be the purpose for these specific body parts? I mean, do they core out the rectum and put a pump on there and suck all the blood out, I mean… […] Why? Why do they do this?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Close? I’m close?
A: Yes. […]
Q: (L) OK, I think we kind of have an answer to this one, but there have been very frequently associated with the phenomenon of cattle mutilations, sightings of black, unmarked helicopters. Who or what are these helicopters?
A: Variable.
Q: (L) Are some of these helicopters disguised alien craft? Are some of these helicopters the property of the U.S. Government?
A: Yes to both.

Nick Redfern writes in Top Secret Alien Abduction Files (2018): “in some cases the witnesses described the black helicopters flying in complete silence. Others swore that the helicopters vanished in a flash of light—something which has led some UFO researchers to conclude that the helicopters are really alien spacecraft which have the ability to change their appearance into multiple forms.”

Q: (T) Are some of these helicopters private enterprise?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Oh, boy Terry, you had to do that! A whole new can of worms!
A: All are interconnected […]

In other words, more bidirectional mimicry. In another context, Kelleher says:

At NIDS we did a lengthy investigation of the black triangles. 150 cases. These things were one hundred yards long, low flying, huge, coming in over neighbourhoods and interstate highways and flying at tree top level. Brightly lit and silent. After the first ten we thought it has to be an advanced tech Special Access Programme by the Air Force. But the pilots were taking enormous risks over populated neighbourhoods with experimental craft? After 100 cases we concluded they were not US Air Force. Pilots were violating all safety features. It was decided the phenomenon was mimicking SAPs. We created a hypothesis: “bi-directional mimicry” where the phenomenon was reflecting back to us what our advanced SAPs were doing.

In this case, it seems possible that government/military sources started using helicopters to confuse the mutilation issue and throw off any investigation, and the NHI responded by mimicking the helicopters, thus further confusing the issue and implicating human sources in cases with which they were unconnected.

Q: (L) OK, that’s good enough. Who are the Oriental-appearing personnel that have been seen manning the helicopters and the white vans that have been sighted all over the country?
A: MIB.
Q: (T) Talk about opening up another can of worms! (L) I’m not even going to touch that one!
A: And government copycats.

See the compilation on Men in Black.

May 25, 1996

Q: (L) OK, I have also been reading about cattle mutilations, that specific parts of the body are taken…
A: Rumen.
Q: (L) What is that?
A: Cattle part.

The rumen is a large fermentation chamber within the stomach of ruminant animals, its first and largest compartment. The rumen is rarely if ever specifically mentioned in mutilation reports.

Q: (L) Why do they take an eyeball? What do they want only one eyeball?
A: Study soul pattern.
Q: (L) Can you study a soul pattern through an eyeball?
A: Like a tape recorder.
Q: (L) Why do they take part of a lip?
A: DNA library.
Q: (L) Well, how many eyes and DNA libraries do they need? This is happening a lot.
A: Some is copycat by “secret government.”
Q: (L) I have heard a recent rumor that the Chupacabras makes three puncture marks, and that one of them extends all the way up into the brain. Is this true?
A: No.
Q: (L) Are the stories being heard from the southwest and Mexico, and even from south Florida, are they all the Chupacabras?
A: Some.

For more on Chupacabras, see the collections on window-fallers, which are implicated in some mutilations, especially those limited to exsanguination.

February 22, 1997

A: […] Heard anything about synthetic blood, and blood and plasma alteration lately?
Q: (L) There’s a can of worms for you! Alright, I’ll bite! Go ahead, tell us about the synthetic blood and the blood plasma. (T) There’s probably been a lot of research into that…
A: Less “mutes” needed.

By 2001, there were two main types of artificial blood in development: red blood cell (for oxygen transport), and platelet (for hemostasis). For the first, there are two sub-types: hemoglobin based and perfluorocarbon (PFC) based. “Several different forms of platelet substitute are now under development: infusible platelet membranes (IPM), thrombospheres, and lyophilized human platelets. Only one product, IPM, is currently in clinical trials in the USA.” As for artificial plasma, there is simulated body fluid.

June 7, 1997

Q: Is there any relation between the dietary restrictions of the Jews and the instructions for animal sacrifice on the altar as delivered in the book of Leviticus, and the present-day cattle mutilations and possible use of humans for food?
A: Disconnected variables.
Q: OK, let’s back up: is there any relationship between the instructions for animal sacrifice and the cattle mutes?
A: Only in the general sense of enzyme actions upon leukocytes.

While it’s unclear what if any process might affect leukocyte enzymes in animal sacrifices, high temperatures, for example, can affect leukocyte enzyme actions in living animals. And pre-slaughter stress triggers rapid releases of some enzymes into the blood (though these do not affect blood cells).

Q: Does that mean that the instructions for preparation of sacrificial animals were designed to prepare them for alien “food”?
A: More for energy transfer.
Q: Do you mean energy transfer in the sense of a) the transfer of the energy of the animal through the sacrifice, or b) the transfer of the energy of the human performing the sacrifice into the animal, and then through the animal to the alien (and I am using the term alien in its broadest sense)?
A: Why not both?

August 15, 2020

Q: (L) Let’s ask about these horse mutilations in France. The article says:
‘Barbaric’ horse killings put French countryside on alert
French police are investigating a spate of killings of horses involving mutilation of the animals’ bodies.
The latest in Cortambert, a village in the Saone-et-Loire region, occurred overnight on Friday.
The horse’s right ear was cut off, one of its eyes was gouged out and its genitals had been cut away. “This is absolutely barbaric,” a local official said.
A Paris police spokeswoman said there had been about 10 similar cases across France since the start of the year, most in the north and many taking place in secluded meadows.
She said there were also cases between 2014 and 2016 and that similar killings and mutilations of horses had been reported in the past in Belgium and Germany.
But the high number in France was unprecedented over such a short period. […]
She said all types of horses had fallen victim, as well as one donkey, and that mutilation of an ear was a common factor. No meat had been taken from the carcasses.
(L) Well, I guess inquiring minds want to know: What’s going on here?
A: Satanists are widely active in these times.
Q: (L) So you’re saying this is the work of some kind of satanic cult?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And it’s not like cattle mutilations done by aliens?
A: No.

Cultists have been the number-one suspect of human-directed mutilation activity in the English-speaking world. However, religions that practice such sacrifices, like Santería, usually use small animals like chickens and goats, and no such cultists have ever been caught in the multiple police investigations surrounding the cattle mutilation phenomenon. The possibility remains that at least some large-animal mutilations are the result of ritualistic practices. However, their surgical techniques would probably fall into the “sloppy” category.

July 6, 2024

Q: (Approaching Infinity) What is it about the flesh of mutilated animals that makes predators avoid eating it and in some cases for the flesh to not decompose for a very long time?
A: The presence of a time lock of 4D that is a side effect of the event.
Q: (Joe) So if there was a 4D bleedthrough, like they mentioned in the last session about those sheep and stuff, where a section of 4D comes and then, if that were to happen and someone here was viewing it or was there in the area, would they see those sheep for example, or whatever was in that 4D bleedthrough area? Would people still be able to see it or does it disappear from their vision?
A: Some would see, but most would not.
Q: (L) Is that because of the time-lock element, that it locks the time and there’s a skip, and then time starts again and the people viewing don’t see anything because it happened in that skip?
A: Yes.
Q: (Andromeda) So it sounds like the time lock doesn’t work on some?
A: Yes. […]
Q: (Ryan) Does this technology work by the fourth or fifth dimensions without affecting the three main spatial ones?

A: Close.

“Time locks” will be covered in a future installment of the series on alien abduction.

Further watching

Alien Nutrition: Energetic Feeding

The Cassiopaea Experiment

May 1

The article on cattle mutilations introduced the topic of alien nutrition, specifically blood and emotion as sources of food, as well as the phenomenon of human mutilation. Both topics are rarely discussed in ufology. Aside from brief mentions, chapters, or articles devoted to human mutilation, for instance, a book has yet to be devoted to the subject. …

Read full story