UFOs/UAP Part 2
Spheres, saucers, Tic-Tacs, triangles and jellyfish
Spheres/Orbs
The Immaculate Constellation document describes spheres/orbs as follows:
Sphere or Orb: Spheres were the most reported shape, with variations ranging from smooth featureless orbs to spheres with visible openings or appendages. These objects’ prevalence suggests a possible standard in UAP design or function, capable of high maneuverability and speed. The diversity within the sphere category, spanning from simple, polished appearances to more complex structures with appendages, suggests a broad range of purposes or technologies unique to the platform’s mission and/or the originator.
Also included are “common observable behaviors and characteristics” for each shape in the “Defense HUMINT [human intelligence] Dataset.”
Size: Sizes range from small objects to those several meters in diameter.
Speed: Capable of stationary hovering to rapid acceleration; speeds surpassing conventional aircraft have been noted.
Signatures: Often lack conventional signatures such as heat trails; electromagnetic effects on military electronics reported.
Colors: Varied, with grey/metallic, greyish-blue, white/white-yellow, and red/orange-red being prevalent.
Surface Details: Ranges from completely smooth and reflective to having visible protuberances, appendages, concavities, and openings.
Behaviors: High maneuverability, including abrupt direction changes and the ability to hover. Often observed to fly in complex geometrical formations and to operate in tandem.
Atmospheric Phenomena: Occasional disturbances in cloud formations and ‘heatwave’ contrails have been reported.
Biological Effects: Close observers reported feelings unease, and of electronic device malfunctions.
Spheres have been reported throughout the modern UFO era. They include luminous orbs such as “Earth lights” (e.g. those seen in window areas like Hessdalen, Norway, and Brown Mountain, North Carolina), the foo fighters of WWII, and the “green fireballs” of the late 1940s and early 1950s. Metallic spheres were reported alongside flying saucers during the 1947 wave.
UK researcher Patrick Jackson has made spheres the focus of his UAP work. Their presence in many classic UFO cases (photographic and video) went largely unnoticed prior to his work. He argues that there are three sphere types, differing in size and function, and they work in tandem as part of a “global defense” network, targeting and neutralizing other UAP. While the latter hypothesis remains speculative, spherical UAP are often seen in the formations he has identified, typically a group of three with other types farther in the distance.
The Tedesco brothers have also taken a scientific approach, capturing many orbs with their own sensors, accompanied by strange radar anomalies which they hypothesize may be the result of gravitational lensing caused by the crafts’ propulsion.
The Cassiopaeans describe spheres and orbs as “probes,” which the English language defines as a device (e.g. an unmanned exploratory spacecraft) used to obtain, measure and transmit information about its environment. Two more UFOs were referred to as 4D probes (the 2004 “Tic-Tac,” and Nicholas Roerich’s 1927 sighting), but these will be discussed in the section on oval-shaped UAP.
October 25, 1994
Q: (V) What were the red and green balls of light E. [V.’s son] saw several months ago?
A: Grays probing. [In reference to Dyatlov Pass, they described the various “ball lightning” seen during the event as “probing portals.”]
May 27, 2000
Q: (S) I was watching a jet the other day, and I saw two balls in the sky, only a little lighter than the sky itself, and I watched them for about 30 seconds, doing things that were impossible for a plane. What was I seeing?
A: UFO activity of probe in nature.
Q: (L) Were they interacting for her benefit – in her direction – or were they just there in a general sense?
A: Option 2.
Branton’s interview with the mostly fictional “Thomas Castello” contains this answer: “The California mountains all have alien security methods and equipment. The basketball size orbs are used for unmanned patrol.”
September 23, 2023
Q: (Approaching Infinity) What exactly are the metallic orbs that have been observed on numerous occasions, even by group members?
A: 4D probes.
Q: (Joe) […] When a person sees them, is it always related to the person? Is there some kind of a connection between the person seeing them or being there, or could it just be that the person just happens to observe them[…]?
A: Usually a relationship.
Q: (L) And when you say a 4D probe, obviously this is something that is beyond what we can think of as a probe. Are these probes able to read minds or to control human behavior?
A: Yes. [Recall the mystery drones’ “psychic reading and influencing.”]
Q: (L) Are they able to open portals between dimensions or densities?
A: If enough are present.
Q: (Joe) Are they precursors to abductions?
A: Sometimes.
Q: (L) Has there been an increase in the prevalence of these objects?
A: Yes.
Luminous orbs, therefore, may sometimes represent the appearance of actual portals, while metallic spheres may have the ability to open portals. This is interesting in light of reports of luminous orbs seeming to transform into either beings or craft. In reference to the mystery drones, for example, the Daily Mail quotes Dr. Kit Green regarding his report on anomalous health incidents written for the AAWSAP program:
Dr. Green said he became the go-to expert for military patients who had out-of-this-world experiences backed up by witnesses and radar data – including cases of ‘big silent drones’ which ‘hovered and moved in odd ways’, ‘showed emanations of funny lights, patterns and strobes’, and even ‘cloaked or changed shape’ and ‘instantaneously appeared and disappeared’.
In 2011 a Reddit user described an experience from 2007. The witness observed at close distance a pulsating red orb surrounded in what appeared to be a “plasma sheath”:
[…] it was not a solid glowing red sphere, but instead seemed to be a ‘red light liquid’ [that] was washing around. […] As I am watching this I realize the “plasma” is.. de-materializing? The center red pulsating ball of light started to spin from right to left, and stretch and it grew wings. Plane wings. It looked a lot like a drone plane!! (Complete with a silvery finish, and what looked like a cockpit, however there was no ‘tail end’ to speak of) The outer sphere was now completely gone. […] On each wing tip there was a light, one yellow the other white, blinking on and off back and forth. At the underbelly was the SAME red ball of liquid light, still blinking. It seemed wobbly.
Additionally, Belleville, NJ, Mayor Michael Melham shared with NewsNation Dan Oliverio’s footage of what he claimed to be orbs morphing into fixed-wing drones, observed from Long Island.
Saucers/Discs
While not the most frequently reported in U.S. government reports, saucers remain the classic UAP shape and the object of many famous cases, including those involving Betty and Barney Hill, Travis Walton and Bob Lazar. The Immaculate Constellation document states:
Disc or Saucer: Saucer-shaped UAPs, reported with and without domes, were the second-most common shape reported. Flat saucers were reported as well, these being disc like objects without pronounced domes. Traditional bi-convex UAPs are also reported in the data.
Size: Generally, range from a few meters to over 20 meters in diameter
Speed: Exhibits capabilities for both hovering and high-speed flight, often making sudden sprints.
Signatures: Radar detection varies, visual sightings more common. Some reports include a humming sound.
Colors: Metallic silver or gray is common, though some have been reported as emitting light or changing color.
Surface Details: Variations include smooth, featureless surfaces to those with visible domes or segmented panels.
Behaviors: Sudden vertical ascents, hovering, and silent operation. Some reports indicate the ability to become invisible or blend into the sky.
Unique emissions: Instances of electromagnetic interference in nearby devices and vehicles.
Atmospheric Phenomena: Visual disturbances, such as shimmering air or sudden fog formation.
November 19, 1994
This session concerns the Carp UFO or “Guardian” case. In October 1991, UFO researchers and organizations received a 3-minute VHS tape from an individual identifying himself as “Guardian.” It showed what appeared to be a bright UFO seemingly hovering and landing at night, with four flares burning on the ground nearby. Included were a map showing the “Grey’s landing area,” with notes indicating that the flares were to help the UFO “fly under the radar and know where to land” and alleged Canadian Department of National Defence documents (later determined to be forgeries).
Guardian had also sent typewritten reports, photographs and maps to researchers in November 1989, describing a UFO crash that had allegedly occurred in the same area of Ottawa. The case was researched by Bob Oechsler, among others, and featured twice on Unsolved Mysteries in 1992 and 1993.
Q: (L) Was the Carp, Ontario, UFO landing a real UFO landing?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Who was involved in that?
A: Grays.
Q: (L) Anyone else?
A: No, but government wants to use it, as in “opportunity knocks.” UFO per se was not staged. Guardian story was.
Here’s a sample of that story, as told in the forged DND documents: “The remaining text suggests aliens wish to take over the world via the cultural arts and a liaison with the ‘Red Chinese.’ ‘The earth is their entertainment’ writes Guardian of the ‘beautiful blonds’ who are infiltrating the New York art world, Hollywood, rock music, literature and sculpture.” The 1989 documents had included information on “the 2 millimeter, spheroid, brain implants. Surgically inserted through the nasal orifice the individual can be fully monitored and controlled.” It claimed that implanted abductees are classified by the government as “zombies” who are programmed to overthrow mankind, and included some blatantly propagandistic geopolitical predictions, e.g. that China will defeat Israel, invade Europe and launch “space-based bacteriological weapons” at the Arctic, thus spreading them into Russia and North America – a plan said to begin sometime in the following five years.
Q: (L) Was the UFO actually flown by aliens?
A: Yes. Government has miles of UFO footage in its possession. May use at its discretion.
Q: (T) What does it mean that the Guardian story was staged? How? Is the video tape real?
A: Used tape to concoct story around.
Q: (T) Did the individual calling himself Guardian actually film that?
A: No.
Q: (T) Who filmed it?
A: Military.
Q: (T) How did they know to be there in the middle of Ontario, Canada, to film that landing?
A: Landing took place near where regiment of NATO reservists were training.
According to author and former UFO researcher Ian Rogers, Canadian forces regularly trained in the Carp region. A military base is located nearby, as is a government nuclear fallout shelter (decommissioned in 1994).
Q: (T) Did it take place where they said it did?
A: Near.
Q: (T) Was the woman in the farmhouse part of the plot?
A: Saw UFO. Was part of “flap”.
Q: (T) Was the UFO experience that the woman in the farmhouse had, was that the same event on the Guardian tape?
A: No. But similar.
The woman in question was Diane Labanek, who coincidentally witnessed both of the events that seemingly prompted Guardian’s mailings: a sighting on November 4, 1989, and another on August 18, 1991. However, according to Ian Rogers, “There were other people in West Carleton to claimed to have been seeing things during that time.” One of these was Susan Gill, a Canadian government employee who wished to remain anonymous at the time:
On August 18, Gill, too, witnessed a saucer with rotating lights behind the trees of her home, which took off into the sky in a blink. She saw military trucks driving near her property the next morning, and claimed to have experienced an abduction. After her death in 2018, her grandson Derrick found a letter left for her family to read after she died. In it she described her sighting and abduction. She recalled seeing the lights while watching TV, going outside, then experiencing a period of missing time followed by seeing the occupants “coming out of the woods and boarding the craft.” The next thing she knew, she was back in the house watching TV. Alerted by her dog, she then saw the UFO hovering in the sky and shooting off into the distance.
Q: (T) So we have a woman who saw a UFO landing, and one that they had on tape, and when she came forward to talk about her sighting, they decided to use the footage to corroborate her story, is that correct?
A: Yes.
This is contradicted by the evidence. Labanek was discovered during the course of Oechsler’s investigation, and hadn’t publicized her account prior to the Guardian material being sent. (Though researcher Graham Lightfoot had previously investigated her 1989 sighting in regards to the initial Guardian material.)
Q: (T) Did the woman know about the NATO maneuvers?
A: No.
Q: (T) Were the NATO maneuvers near where she was?
A: Yes. All major military exercises are plagued by UFOs.
We will see several more examples of this as we proceed.
December 21, 2012
In November 2012, FOX31 Denver reported on a local man who captured numerous UAP on camera. According to the man, who wished to remain anonymous, the objects “appear around noon or 1:00 p.m. at least a couple of times a week.” FOX31 Denver photojournalist Noah Skinner captured similar footage while covering the story.
Q: (L) OK, we’ve got this Denver UFO thing. Obviously, it’s a UFO, which means it’s what?
A: Hyperdimensional as we have discussed before.
Q: (L) Is this anything new, or is this something that’s been going on for a long time?
A: Longer than you suspect.
Q: (L) Well, obviously it doesn’t show up on cameras unless you slow the film down…
A: That is typical as we have discussed in the past.
Q: (L) Does this mean that we’re heading for being invaded by aliens?
A: We have also covered densities and that sort of thing. Your planet is definitely moving through a transition as all the many things you note and discuss point toward. […] And UFOs become more obvious during such transitions.
Q: (Perceval) Why is this Denver thing even unusual? (L) I didn’t think it was that unusual either.
A: It exits and enters via a “time lock”. [Time locks were also mentioned in reference to abductions and cattle mutilations.]
Q: (L) […] What I get from what you’re saying is that extra or excessive or highly visible UFO activity is only a temporary or transitory thing when the planet is going through some kind of density transition. Is that what you’re suggesting?
A: Yes.
Q: […] (Ailen) But then why do they become more visible during a time of transition?
A: Difficult to control matching frequencies when the frequencies of the multilevel environment keeps [sic] changing. [Similar statements were made about the “mystery drones”: their possible difficulty maintaining a fixed appearance due to “thinning of the veil” and “the invisibility granted by a firmly structured density-veil is not as secure as previously.”]
October 26, 2015
Q: (Galatea) I wanted to ask about the supposed giant flying saucer that was in the clouds that people thought was a reflection of a lamp? […] (L) What is the nature of this UFO photo?
A: Hoax.
Ovals/Tic-Tacs/Cigars
Cigars are another classic UFO shape, frequently reported in the early waves. Some of the most publicized cases include the Chiles-Whitted UFO encounter (1948), the Betty Andreasson (Luca) abductions and the Gary McKinnon NASA hack (2000) (here’s an approximation of the object he saw in a NASA photo).
Egg-shaped UAP have also been reported frequently, e.g. the Lonnie Zamora incident (1964), the Voronezh UFO incident (1989) and numerous others. They have also cropped up in several crash-retrieval accounts. For example, Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt participated in a retrieval in Peru in 1997, describing the craft as “shaped like almost like between an egg and a teardrop.” The great-uncle of Eric Taber, a defense aerospace contractor, told him of an egg-shaped UFO kept at Area 51 since the 1980s. Taber told Ross Coulthart: “The object was egg-shaped, about the size of a SUV, silverish-grey in color, smooth, seamless, no control surfaces or propulsion visible. No writing, no symbols of any kind. A few men could pick it up, yet it could not be cut open, and X-rays couldn’t penetrate it. The best engineers at EG&G tried to figure out how to activate it and what its power source was, to no avail. They finally came to the conclusion it was a probe craft sent here from another planet.” Most recently, former Air Force helicopter pilot Jake Barber described retrieving an egg-shaped UAP.
The Immaculate Constellation document classifies these shapes together with Tic-Tacs, but claims not to have reports of them prior to 2003 (in a dataset that begins in 1991):
Oval or Tic-Tac: Oval-shaped UAPs were infrequently reported within the dataset, and only after approximately 2003; these UAPs either maintained a uniform ‘egg-like’ symmetry, occasionally tapered into a teardrop shape. Cylinders with convex ends (Tic-Tacs) fall into this category, and occasionally featured visible protuberances on the ‘top’ or ‘bottom’ of the otherwise uniform platform.
Size: Lengths typically from 6 to 40 meters, maintaining proportional width and height.
Speed: High-speed travel and instant acceleration have been frequently reported, with no sonic boom.
Signatures: Visual identification often notes a lack of contrail.
Colors: White or silver.
Surface Details: Uniformly smooth surface, with occasional reports of protuberances that could be sensors, propulsion elements, weapons, or unknown technology.
Behaviors: Observed ability to hover and then accelerate suddenly. Some encounters describe them maintaining stable positions despite high winds.
May 25, 1996
Q: (L) We were watching television, and they showed a video of a man [Tim Edwards of Salida, Colorado] and his daughter who videotaped a very large object in the sky [on August 27, 1995], and it was there for a long time, and I also understand that someone else taped it from another location. It was a long, white, tubular object. It was estimated to be about a mile long, because they figured this out by the perspectives from the two tapes, sort of by parallax, and it had moving lights on it, and it just hovered or sat there for a very long time. What in the world was this thing?
A: A “mother” ship of Orion STS scanning vectors of the reality-continuum fabric.
Q: (L) Well, they talked about a report of a similar happening at this very same spot, only it was 78 years previous to this [on September 1-7, 1917]. Was there a connection?
A: Yes. Spacetime coordinates linkage.
Q: (L) Was this ship doing anything other than what you have said?
A: No.
Q: (L) Does a mothership carry a lot of small ships?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) How many can be carried in one mothership?
A: 150,000.
During one of Betty Andreasson’s abductions she experienced being taken into a massive, cylinder-shaped “mother ship” in space that could “release a steamy vapor that would envelope the whole craft in a misty cloud.” In 1966, Jacques Vallee classified these “cloud cigars” or “cloud spheres” as “Type II” sightings, with further distinctions for whether the object was slow-moving, stationary (absorbing/ejecting smaller objects) or accompanied by smaller objects. Fowler includes several such sightings in The Watchers II.
Q: (L) Holy Shi’ite Moslems! What size are they? And, we have to remember that these ships are bigger inside, as a rule, because of some sort of strange principle at that level.
A: Exactly, remember, there is variability of physicality on 4th density, but not lack of physicality.
This “TARDIS”-like feature shows up in the literature repeatedly. For example, in an interview on Ecosystemic Futures, Dr. Hal Puthoff brought it up as a hypothetical: “Well, for example, someone approaches a craft that’s of a certain size, and then when they get inside, it’s as big as a football field. Well, how does that happen?” (His answer is spacetime metric engineering of Einstein’s field equations.) Attorney Danny Sheehan relayed to the Daily Mail an account told to him by a crash-retrieval insider involving a “30ft saucer partially embedded in the earth”:
‘They had a guy go into it. He got in there, and it was as big as a football stadium. It was freaking him out and started making him feel nauseous, he was so disoriented because it was so gigantic inside. […] He staggered back out after being in there a couple of minutes, and outside it was four hours later,’ he said. ‘There was all kinds of time distortion and space distortion.’
In The Alien Gene, Moira McGhee shares a case that took place in Essex, UK, in 1937. The subject, Jean, recalled: “In the 1930s no-one had heard of flying saucers, and I thought it was some form of house. When inside it seemed so vast you couldn’t see the far wall.” Regarding a 1987 abduction, Terry Lovelace writes in Devils Den: The Reckoning: “Just as I experienced inside the triangle in 1977, the interior [of the flying disc] seemed twice as large as the exterior.”
April 15, 2000
Q: (L) What kind of UFO was it that [Nicholas Roerich] sighted at the time that he made the dedication of this temple[…]?
A: UFO was a probe. [See volume 1 for more on this excerpt.]
In 1927, the Russian artist hiked the Altai and Himalaya mountains. His travel diary includes the following account:
We all saw, in a direction from north to south, something big and shiny reflecting the sun, like a huge oval moving at great speed. Crossing our camp this thing changed in its direction from south to southwest. And we saw how it disappeared in the intense blue sky. We even had time to take our field glasses and saw quite distinctly an oval form with shiny surface, one side of which was brilliant from the sun.
February 27, 2016
Q: (Joe) You want to ask about Ocean on the forum, who saw a cylinder-shaped UFO and two Asian-looking men? He saw this UFO about 200 feet above him. He saw two Asian men who were looking at it, and then they disappeared. You responded and said it was probably a blimp. But he said there’s nothing other than government or military aircraft allowed in Oman. I was just wondering if he did actually see a cylinder-shaped craft, or was it a blimp?
A: Craft.
Q: (Joe) What about the “Asian men”? He saw two Asian men on the ground looking at it. Then he drove on, and then went back and they were gone.
A: Part of the “away team”. [See John Keel’s description of Men in Black in volume 1.]
Q: (Joe) He was totally cool about it. If I’d seen a giant cylindrical craft 200 feet above my head, I’d be a little alarmed.
June 24, 2023
The November 14, 2004, Tic-Tac encounter – really the culimination of a 10-day flap – is widely considered one of the most significant UAP cases on record, with multiple high-quality witnesses and captured at the time on multiple sensors. The details have been covered in countless documentaries, such as James Fox’s The Phenomenon (2020). The events, which occurred during a Navy training exercise (most likely involving nuclear assets), were also the subject of a still-classified 143-page intelligence report. According to George Knapp and Jeremy Corbell, who have read the report, it describes “encounters of multiple craft above 80,000 feet” which entered the atmosphere from space “and showed total situational dominance.” Some of the Tic-Tacs were observed “docking” with “a structured and maneuverable object underneath the water,” which was also tracked by classified undersea sensor systems.
Q: (Keit) Who made the objects of the Tic-Tac/Nimitz encounter […] and to whom do they belong?
A: Those are 4D probes, not man-made as [John] DeSouza suggests. [Steven Greer claims the same thing.]
Q: (L) Are there similar ones that humans have made?
A: Yes, but much less tech[nologically] advanced. DeSouza is blinded by his failure to understand hyperdimensional variability of physicality. [This comment is important in relation to the mystery-drone discussion on advanced human tech.]
In a private meeting between David Grusch (then UAP lead at the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency) and Canadian MP Larry Maguire, Grusch told him: “The ‘Tic Tac’ case from the USS Nimitz cannot be explained in any way except that the US Navy encountered a ‘non-human intelligently controlled craft’. [Grusch] doesn’t know any other solution that closes with high probability.”
Triangles
Black Triangles were most famously sighted during the 1989-1991 Belgium wave, but have been reported since the 1950s, with some sightings going back as far as the late 19th century. (See David Marler’s 2013 Triangular UFOs: An Estimate of the Situation.) Anther classic case mentioned in volume 1 is Terry Lovelace’s 1977 sighting.
Triangles: Triangles were among the rarest UAPs reported in the data. Most of these sightings were equilateral triangles, occasionally with vertical ‘stabilizers’ visible on the ‘top’ of the UAP. Elongated (isosceles) types were also reported, occasionally with the same vertical stabilizers observed on the equilateral type.
Size: Medium to large sized, ranging from F-16 to football-field size.
Speed: Capable of slow, precise movement as well as rapid acceleration to speeds beyond conventional aircraft.
Signatures: Often reported to emit a soft, humming sound; may affect electronic devices within a certain proximity.
Colors: Black or dark gray, sometimes with white lights at the corners and a central red light; reports of “twinkling” stars across surface.
Surface Details: Some have been described with visible surface textures, like panels or ridges, and occasionally stabilizers.
Behaviors: Hovering is common, as is silent flight. The ability to vanish or accelerate rapidly is frequently reported.
Unique Emissions: Triangular UAPs often emit focused beams of light. Toroidal light patterns are sometimes observed to emanate from a central point, leading to rapid acceleration or disappearance.
Biological Effects: Long-term psychological effects, such as anxiety or insomnia, have been reported, alongside the feeling of ‘being watched’ or shared awareness with the triangle UAP.
July 30, 1994
Q: (L) Did Ann, Candy and Laura see an alien craft last night? [The three participants had gone to visit a friend and saw a stationary, triangular craft with a bright light on each corner. When they pulled off the road under it and stopped, it zoomed away as soon as they got out of the car.]
A: You better believe it.
Q: (L) Whose craft was it?
A: Orion.
Q: (L) Did it appear for us specifically.
A: No.
Q: (L) Do they know we saw them?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Did they leave because we saw them?
A: Yes. […] Craft above now.
Q: (L) Above the house?
A: Absolutely.
May 25, 1996
Q: (L) There was apparently a sighting in Gulf Breeze either last night or the night before – the triangular ships with the orange lights. Were they human or alien?
A: Alien.
Q: (L) Who did they belong to?
A: Same.
Q: (L) Why are there so many kinds of alien ships?
A: See previous statements. VOP [variability of physicality].
December 29, 2009
Q: (Joe) What about the triangular UFO over Moscow, was it real? (Allen) Fake!
A: No.
Two amateur videos showed a large pyramidal object above the Kremlin, supposed to have been taken on December 9, 2009. A similar video from 1968 was filmed over Latvia and kept in the files of the Russian Ministry of Defense. George Knapp aired the footage on KLAS-TV. And in 2017, three separate videos showed a similar object over the Pentagon.
Boomerangs/Arrowheads
Boomerang or Arrowhead: Boomerangs and ‘Arrowhead’ shaped UAPs were also among the rarest reported. The boomerang UAPs exhibited bilateral symmetry, with sweeping wings and high aspect ratio. Arrowhead UAPs also showed bilateral symmetry, but possessed tapered wings and a low aspect ratio, typically with highly swept leading edges.
Size: Wingspans can exceed 30 meters, especially for boomerang-shaped UAPs. Arrowheads typically range from F-16 size to slightly larger.
Speed: Exhibits both gliding at low speeds and the capacity for high-speed flight.
Signatures: Visual sightings often note a slow, silent flight profile.
Colors: Typically dark, blending with the night sky, though some reports include glowing edges or tips.
Surface Details: Smooth surfaces with a notable aerodynamic design; the arrowhead types show more angular features.
Behaviors: Known for silent operation and the ability to execute tight turns.
Unique Emissions: Seem to emit a spherical ‘ball’ of light from the centerline, which partially envelops the UAP during maneuvers, causing electromagnetic interference with local technologies.
The most famous boomerang sighting was the 1997 Phoenix Lights. Others include the 2008 Stephensville, Texas, sighting and the 1951 Lubbock Lights. (For more on the phenomenon, see this article.)
The following session refers to a sighting that occurred on August 16, 1993 just after 10:00 pm. The night was clear and moonless. The witness describes it as follows:
It was a 300-foot-wide black boomerang, emanating a faint reddish glow, moving so slow and low that I knew if I had been standing on the roof of my two-story house, I could have reached up and touched it! We had plenty of time to observe it and note the “brushed matte black metal” appearance of its underside.
We watched as it moved ever so slowly overhead, utterly silent, seeming to float more than anything else. It continued south, seeming to skim the treetops.
We were looking at each other and all saying at once: “What was that?!”, when my son shouted: “Another one!” and, sure enough, just to the west of the path of the first one, there was another. Every detail was identical: altitude, speed, reddish glow, and utter silence. I was, at this point, in sufficient possession of my senses to try to hear something. Dead silence. And that struck me as odd, since there are normally all kinds of night sounds: crickets, night birds, frogs and so forth. But there was no sound, no vibration, no hum. Nothing.
October 20, 1994
Q: What was the flying boomerang the kids and I saw last year?
A: Lizard-projection multiple-reality station.
Q: Did they fly over my house deliberately for me to see them?
A: Yes.
Q: What was the purpose of them showing themselves to me?
A: Make you aware of existence.
Q: Why did they want to make me aware of their existence?
A: That is an extremely complicated situation.
Q: Did that little flap that occurred in Pasco county in spring of 1993 happen as a result of Frank’s and my activities?
A: Yes. [“UFO flaps are caused by our activities and these communications” (1995-2-18). For more on this idea, see the discussion on “windows” in volume 1.]
Q: Was there a craft over my house the night I hypnotized Pat Z. [on April 15, 1993]?
A: Tuned into visual stimuli from implants. And Z.’s implants alerted scout craft of Grays and Lizzies. [See volume 1. According to the C’s, one of the functions of implants is to monitor the perceptions of abductees.]
St. Petersburg Times journalist Thomas French writes:
The newspaper and TV were reporting multiple sightings of UFOs in the area. From mid to late April in 1993, more than a dozen people in Pasco, Hernando and Pinellas counties said they had seen a large, boomerang-shaped craft moving across the sky. One of the witnesses, a Hernando County sheriff’s deputy, said the craft carried no markings, was adorned with blue lights and had a wingspan of at least 200 feet. He watched it for several minutes, he said, before it accelerated away from him at a speed that would have been impossible for any human-made craft.
“Based on what I know now, no, I don’t think it’s from this planet,” the deputy told a St. Petersburg Times reporter. “Nothing on Earth could hover and haul ass like that.”
In Amazing Grace, Laura Knight-Jadczyk writes:
Something about these stories bugged me. After the whole affair died down, I assembled the reports in chronological order, since some people gave their reports only after seeing that it was safe to discuss it, and the order of the reports in the news was not the order of the sightings. I realized that the very first sighting of the black boomerang shaped objects had had been made in New Port Richey on the evening of Thursday, April 15, at the exact time I was conducting my hypnosis session with the woman who lost 50 miles between the blue light and the red light [i.e. a case of missing time]. What was even more upsetting was that the woman who had been the first to see the UFOs only six blocks or so from my house. From her description, and the location of her house, it seems that she had seen the black boomerang hovering directly over my neighborhood, maybe even right over my house.
February 11, 1995
Q: (L) In a past reading you told me that the UFO I saw above my pool was a “multiple reality” projection. What is this in layman’s terms? Did we see a nuts-and-bolts craft, or did we see something that was projected?
A: Your mind was given to you to be used, we provide clues.
Q: (L) […] OK, so this was a point in spacetime where there was or is a convergence of 3rd- and 4th-[density] realities so that they were probably in 4th density, and we were in 3rd; yet the area around my house was created as a multiple reality station for this event to occur, is that correct?
A: Bravo! […]
Q: (L) I heard from Terry and Jan that there have been reports of numerous sightings of UFOs in the region, particularly on Saturday nights when we are doing our sessions. Is there any connection between this activity and what we are doing?
A: Of course!
This description, and the presence of the “Oz factor” (unnatural silence) during the sighting, was clarified in a session thirty years later:
March 9, 2024
Q: (Altair) Why do people often report the ceasing of all sounds from the environment when a UFO passes closely? It’s like UFOs carry a zone of silence with them.
A: They carry a zone of 4D with them.
In other words, the immediate area surrounding a UAP or NHI “projection” becomes engulfed in a hyperdimensional state or environment, i.e. a “multiple reality (3D/4D) station.” In Earth, Timothy Good quotes an account from 1952 by Giampiero Monguzzi, who described it like this: “quite suddenly, this noise had stopped completely […] we couldn’t even hear our own heavy footsteps on the gravel and icy ground […] I saw my wife’s mouth move but failed to detect a sound. It was an uncanny, compact silence which surrounded us, a strange kind of vacuum.”
A related question was asked at the same session:
Q: (Navigator) I'd like to ask about the “Zone of Silence” as referenced in its own thread. My speculation is that the area of the Chihuahuan Desert (of which the Zone of Silence is part of, see the thread for details), was a cometary bombardment hit zone at one point, and the materials deposited as a result of this could explain, at least partially, the reported physical anomalies. But, as this area is also geographically connected to New Mexico and Arizona, areas reported as being high in UFO/extraterrestrial activity, it could be the case that there is more than just magnetic aberrations to the Zone. I am thinking bases, portals or whatnot (Edgar Cayce also reported this). So, some open questions: What is it with the “Zone of Silence” that has been witness to physical anomalies and strange UFO encounters?
A: 4D bleedthrough.
January 7, 1996
Q: (L) Now, with all of us here, we would like to ask why the black, flying boomerangs showed up on the night Pat first came for hypnosis?
A: Examine issue carefully.
Q: (L) The first thing we thought about it was that this was an, if not necessarily rare, at least rarely observed type of craft, and the event itself was rare. Is this correct?
A: It is rare. […]
Q: (L) At the time we had all those sightings around here on the night we did that session with Pat, why did so many other people see them?
A: Window was “blast.”
July 26, 1997
Q: In several cases of the flying boomerangs, collies were involved. And, subsequent to my own sighting, I lost my collie within 3 months. He just started wasting away and died and nothing we did helped. What is the connection, if any?
A: Genetic biological manufacturing defect leaves open absorption of unusually high levels of collateral radiation. [An example of the sixth observable.]
Q: But why is it that so many people who have seen these boomerangs seem to have collies?
A: That is not always the case.
Q: Well, but a significant number! I wonder if there is something genetic in the people who prefer collies. Remember, collies are a Celtic dog! [See volume 1 for the connection between abductees and Celtic heritage.]
A: Indeed!!
July 18, 1998
Q: (L) OK, another thing that Imbrogno noted was that they graphed the UFO sightings in this area [e.g. New York State], and what they found was that they occurred in these places over and over again. So, the guy goes out and investigates the sites and found, more often than not, these standing stones or stone chambers that have been connected to the ancient Celts. […] there was a considerable series of sightings of these black boomerang–type craft. Are these stones markers of doorways between densities?
A: Windows. [See volume 1, which also includes this excerpt.]
Q: […] (L) What is the connection between the Celts and these flying black boomerangs?
A: None. […] Crystals make density and dimensional windows open from “time to time” thus making the oblivious quite obvious.
Q: (L) Are the craft always there and the crystalline structure of the stone causes the windows to open and make them visible?
A: If certain factors mitigate…
November 7, 2015
Q: (L) OK, back to the butterfly UFO. […] (Andromeda) It’s the boomerang butterfly. (Galatea) Is it a legitimate UFO?
A: Legit.
Q: (Galatea) I knew it! I got one right. Is it the Mothman?
A: 4D STS [i.e. 4th-density service to self, i.e. “alien”].
This sighting took place on October 24, 2015 on the Kentucky/Ohio border.
A similar object was photographed by Eddy Abbot over Ewa Beach in Hawaii in 2008. The craft hovered in the sky for around 45 minutes, at which point two military jets and two helicopters approached the area. As they closed in on the object, it instantaneously accelerated at a high velocity away and into the ocean.
Irregular/Organic
This is the last shape dealt with in the Immaculate Constellation report:
Irregular or Organic: Irregularly shaped UAPs, those that defy simple geometric description, were among the rarest reported sightings. Shape-shifting UAPs also appear in the dataset, typically having a spherical or disc-like “base” form from which irregular geometries are seen to project. “Floating brain” or “jellyfish” UAPs are present as well, characterized by a central mass from which multiple “arms” or spars hang downward. Finally, combined shapes were also observed, including cubes within spheres, ringed saucers, and various rectangular and cuboid forms.
Size: Highly variable, from small, compact forms to larger, more sprawling structures.
Speed: Movements range from slow drifting to rapid acceleration, often unpredictable.
Signatures: Some reports include unusual sounds or the absence of expected aerodynamic noise; electromagnetic effects are common.
Colors: Often described with bioluminescent qualities or shifting colors, particularly for “floating-brain” or jellyfish types.
Surface Details: Descriptions vary widely, from smooth, fluid-like surface to complex, articulated structures.
Behaviors: Demonstrates a wide range of behaviors, from controlled maneuvering to erratic patterns of movement. Shape-shifting abilities have been reported.
Biological Effects: Observations include physical sensations of warmth or cold, unexplained smells (e.g., ozone), and psychological distress.
Unique Emissions: The floating-brain/jellyfish UAPs occasionally exhibit ‘patterned’ luminescence or fluctuating lights/colors (typically only visible in the higher-end of the electromagnetic spectrum).
Atmospheric Phenomena: Sudden temperature drops, and the appearance of clouds have been reported.
A “floating brain” case can be found in the “Sedge Masters” story, published by UFO Magazine in 1998. Written by “Greg Halifax” (whom Richard Dolan identifies as Jeffrey W. Griffith, corporate counsel for Hughes Aircraft, which became TRW in 1965), it was based on the recollections of TRW employee Mary Elliot. According to Jacques Vallee, Elliot “once claimed there once was a reverse-engineering project at TRW, called Zodiac. Her background is verified (including her badge number at Area 51).” Worked into the story is an actual case from 1971 in which two witnesses described seeing “2 beings like disembodied brains about the size of basketballs.” Under hypnosis, one of the witnesses recalled receiving a telepathic message. Later that night he experienced an abduction by tall Grays. (See Bullard’s UFO Abductions: The Measure of a Mystery, case #138.)
November 19, 1994
Q: (L) Several times I have heard reference to big flying rectangular boxes. I would like to know who these belong to.
A: Lizard projections.
Q: (L) Why do they have so many different types of craft?
A: Not all are theirs.
Note that in the May 1996 session above they ascribed the variety of craft to 4th-density “variability of physicality.” A 1995 session added a third variation:
June 17, 1995
A: […] the entire subject matter referred to as “UFOs” is extremely varied and multi-faceted in nature and does not represent any one condition, entity, source of entities, mode of transport, density level, or anything else related to these.
August 27, 2022
Q: (Puma) In early August of this year a photograph of a UFO that the UK Ministry of Defense kept for 32 years was released. This photo was labeled by many as “the best image in the world.” The Calvine UFO caused a sensation on social networks when it was digitally processed. This UAP/UFO had very different characteristics than is usual. No bright lights. It looks organic, rocky, one person wrote, “almost like the underwater side of an old rusty boat with algae and shit growing on the fuselage.” In the image, we can see an angular, diamond-shaped object, estimated to be about 30 meters long, flying a short distance away from what appears to be a Harrier jet. Is it a real UFO[…]?
A: Yes.
Q: (Puma) If it is a real UFO, was it manned or was it a probe?
A: Manned.
Q: (Puma) What are the organic, worn characteristics of this UAP due to? [Note that this question was based not on the original photograph, but an artificially upscaled version.]
A: Structural specifications for camouflage.
UAPTF member Lenval Logan saw an identical object while he was on a military flight towards Scotland in January 1990, zipping in and out of clouds and making sharp changes of direction. As Mike Colangelo summarizes his account: “He later asked a Royal Air Force AWACS crew if they know of an object that does very quick zig-zags in the sky. They said they know of it but don’t know who it belongs to because it would never respond to communications on the radio and when they vectored aircraft towards the object it would zip away.”
For an allegedly blind remote-viewing of this photograph, see longtime remote viewer and former vice president of the Farsight Institute Birdie Jaworski’s sessions below (she also remote viewed the mystery drones and identified a number of players: military helicopters, some high-tech military drones, NHI orbs, and NHI “mimic drones”):
September 23, 2023
The Petrozavodsk “jellyfish UFO” mass sighting from September, 1977, reported over a large area of northwestern Russia, was discussed in volume 1. The C’s said it represented a “mass transfer” of 4D status between densities. While it appeared as a ship, it was “alive” and “would not be seen as a ‘ship’ on 4D.”
January 13, 2024
Q: (Approaching Infinity) Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp recently released a video from Iraq taken on a base in late 2017 of a strange jellyfish UFO that was visible only on thermal camera. It resembles many other videos people have taken over the years. The video itself has been confirmed as legitimate by a soldier who was stationed at the base who said they referred to it as the “spaghetti monster.” What was this object?
A: 4D energy being that feeds on human suffering.
The footage was captured over a secret CIA base in Iraq. According to Corbell, footage also exists of the object entering a lake for about 17 minutes before flying out and away at a high speed, demonstrating transmedium capabilities. The object showed up on thermal cameras, but not infrared night-vision, and the thermal system could not lock onto the object, suggestive of possible active jamming.
According to Sarah Gamm, who worked for the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, some aspect of the government “resolved” this case as a cluster of balloons. Lenval Logan, however, who worked for the UAPTF, still thinks the case is anomalous, saying: “I don’t just look at the imagery, I look at everything. And when you take into consideration everything, there’s no way this thing could be a balloon. […] It’s almost like 20 minutes long or something like that. And there was some other things going on there […] outliers, that I could sit there and go, tick, tick, tick, tick, these things do not add up.”
A similar object reportedly overflew the Pantex nuclear site in 2013. Captain Kate McCue of the Celebrity Edge cruise ship also recounts seeing a flying jellyfish-type object in 2020 which flew above her ship before descending into the ocean.
Q: (Approaching Infinity) And what was this other jellyfish object seen on February 16th, 2020, in Sao Paulo at 8:45 AM?
A: Similar except more physical. Probe.
Q: (Andromeda) There were several that were kind of jellyfish-like. What’s up with the jellyfish form?
A: Conduits of energy. Representative of the essence of the object as perceived by humans.
I don't understand why with many more cameras around with much better resolution and zoom capabilities, we are still relying on blurry video and photos as evidence.
After reading this series, I've been more skeptical of the phenomenon in combination with the latest drone hype in New Jersey. Sometimes people see what they want to see, whether it's a Chinese drone mother ship or a UFO.
https://tlavagabond.substack.com/p/a-century-of-ufo-psyops-exposed-part
https://tlavagabond.substack.com/p/a-century-of-ufo-psyops-exposed-part-84d?
https://tlavagabond.substack.com/p/a-century-of-ufo-psyops-exposed-part-0eb
I just want to say thank you for that compilation. It is very helpful to understand . . .