5 Comments
May 11·edited May 20Liked by The Cassiopaea Experiment

In Salvador Freixedo's book "The Human Farm", I "suspect" that he unknowingly had contact with "Clandestines or Cryptoterrestrials"... In the chapters that talk about Lula, José Luis and Rufo there are good examples.

Expand full comment
author

Is "The Human Farm" available in English? If not, could you share a few details about those three people?

Expand full comment
May 12Liked by The Cassiopaea Experiment

I was searching on the internet and I think there is no English version, but it is possible to get it in .PDF in Spanish and translate the text to read it.

I would like to give a summary of the indicated chapters, but I think that could contaminate all the details, which are many, I can only tell you that in each chapter of this book there are details that follow the same line as almost all the cassiopaea.substack.com published until now.

I'm talking about reading like 40 pages of the 165 pages or so that this book has.

If you want you can contact me privately via email.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks, Sindy. We'll try to get the pdf and translate it.

Expand full comment

You might be interested in reading this book. (Review below)

Also keep in mind that John Keel of mothman fame later on started to think it was a psychological phenomenon.

It was also interesting to notice that poltergeists are impossible to capture on video, but usually involved a girl going through puberty which at the time of Catholicism caused a lot of disassociation in those stressed girls.

Perhaps that's why the c's said that psychedelics etc can open up one to these.... Much like a religious experience, one's beliefs can hijack perception... A waking dream or a nightmare!

Even though it wasn't "real" it does have real effects and can cause changes in people. For example multiple personalities in one person can have a blind one and a seeing one!

Even in the latest session they connect consciousness with why some see this and others see that:

"Ryan) Why do 3D window-fallers fall through one window but not another? For example, why haven't there been reports of chupacabras in Europe? What relates the consciousness of a window-faller to a specific locator?

A: The consciousnesses of those located at the locator. "

Perhaps you can ask the C's about Harpur's book. His theory seems very plausible as the deeper I tried to study the paranormal, the less I could find anything clear. It's 2024, cameras are everywhere and we get a Pentagon video of a jet following a dot. Guess what, the pilot was a contractor aka CIA 😂, not military. That agency primarily deals with psychological operations. I'm still open to it but nowadays it's so easy to deep fake it!

https://library.lol/main/F0FFF93E5BDCCCD182B46BCC074E05BB

"Daimonic Reality by Patrick Harpur examines UFOs and a wide variety of “paranormal” phenomena from a rather unique angle. Although Harpur never fully defines the daimonic—“the daimonic that can be defined is not the true daimonic,” as Lao-Tse would say—it seems to exist both inside us and outside us. Like the Greek daemon and unlike the Christian demon, it takes both good/healing and bad/terrifying forms, depending on our commitment to rationalistic ego states.

In a sense, the daimonic is like the collective unconscious of Carl Jung, inside us as a part of our total self that the ego wishes to deny, outside us in all the other humans who ever existed and in the dreams, myths, and arts of all the world. But Harpur follows Irish poet (and Golden Dawn alumnus) W. B. Yeats as often as he follows Jung, and traces some of his ideas back to Giordano Bruno and the alchemical/hermetic mystics of the Renaissance. The daimonic is just a bit more personalized and individualized than Jung’s species unconscious.

Harpur’s major thesis is that unless we recognize the daimonic (make friends with it, Jung would say) it takes increasingly malignant and terrifying forms. For instance, the Greys of UFO abduction lore, he says, are deliberately mirroring our ego-centered and “scientistic” age—showing no emotions of the humans they experiment upon, just as the ideal science student feels no emotion and has no concern with the emotions of the animal being tortured in his laboratory."

Despite dealing with many subjects common to conspiracy theories, this book does not quite fit into that category. We are the conspirators, so to speak. We have repressed the most creative part of ourselves and now it is escaping in terrifying forms."

Expand full comment