Ancient Aliens Part 3: Giants

Alien Races Part 5c

Every continent has legends of a time when giants lived on Earth and interacted with humanity. Most well known are the stories of David and Goliath, Odysseus and Polyphemus, Thor and Hrungnir, Lugh and Balor, and Jack the Giant Killer. They show up as the Nephilim in the Bible, the Greek Titans and Gigantes, the Norse Frost Giants of Niflheim and the Celtic Fomorians.

Various North American tribes have similar legends of tribes of giants up to 2 or 3 times taller than normal humans and sometimes described as red- or yellow-haired, bearded and even white skinned. These giants were often violent and cannibalistic (in other cases detested because of their “vile sexual habits”), and the tribes describe great battles in which the giants were eventually killed off. Other legends recall the giants dying at the same time as the megafauna, such as the mammoths, in a natural catastrophe.

Early explorers of North and South America recounted meeting tribes of giant natives. Jim Vieira and Hugh Newman have collected such accounts ranging from the years 1519 to 1900 by “notable captains, military officers, Smithsonian ethnologists, and other high-ranking officials.” For example, Magellan first encountered giant Patagonians 7 feet or taller in 1520. (Even among the ordinary-sized tribes, by the mid-1800s, Plains nomads were the tallest humans in the world.) Such giant men and women were often chiefs, and they seem to have practiced selective mating in order to retain such traits. They were considered natural royalty, sometimes thought to have been descended from divinity. (Stephen Quayle reports that the same was true for the ancient Celtic tribes, where the giants among them formed the ruling class.)

Throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, archaeologists and regular citizens reported uncovering giant skeletons, mostly in the United States but also in the United Kingdom. Such finds were regularly reported in newspapers and archeological journals, sometimes with photographs of the bones. (Catalina Island was one such location.) Vieira and Newman alone collected around 1,000 such accounts from the U.S., with another 500 worldwide. In the U.S., the skeletons generally ranged 7-12 feet tall; in the UK, 7-15 feet, with a couple enormous outliers (18 and 21 feet, respectively).

The giant skulls were often reported as having “double rows of teeth” (i.e. a second complete set of teeth behind the first, a feature also found in Talmudic descriptions of giants) and jaw bones so big they could fit over a normal human’s. The skeletons were always well proportioned – unlike cases of gigantism. Similarly, the in-person accounts universally describe the giant Natives as attractive, well-proportioned and stately.

In both legend and fact, the giants were often associated with mounds, hill forts, megaliths and other stone structures, and thought to have been their builders. Their remains were often found buried either within or near such structures. In Fingerprints of the Gods Hancock notes that in one myth, Viracocha created a race of giants, but decided to destroy them when they began to fight amongst themselves and refused to work. Of the “First Sun” of the Aztec calendar, the Vaticano-Latin Codex says: “In this age lived the giants,” the relict survivors of which were sometimes encountered in later ages. Hancock encountered an account of the Mexican pyramid at Cholula that closely resembled that of the Tower of Babel, according to which “there appeared gigantic men of deformed stature who possessed the land.” When the Aztecs discovered the already ancient ruins of Teotihuacan, local legend had it that they “had been built by giants and that their purpose had been to transform men into gods.”

By the late 1800s, the relatively new Smithsonian Institution “exerted control over the prehistoric mounds, and all artifacts and skeletons discovered within them.” Vieira and Newman collect dozens of early reports of giant skeletons being sold or gifted to the Institution (or discovered by its own scientists), as described in their annual reports. Cyrus Thomas, the Director of the Division of Mound Exploration in 1882, made it a primary goal “to make a collection of skeletons, especially crania found entombed in the mounds or graves.”

However, by 1910, the Smithsonian had hired Aleš Hrdlička, a fanatical Darwinist and eugenicist with doctrinaire opinions about Native origins, as the curator of the Division of Physical Anthropology. Around that time, the Institution began making public denials about giant evidence. To this day, they deny having any record of the dozens or hundreds of skeletons reported to have been in their possession (often in their own reports). As Vieira and Newman write, the accounts they discovered “appear to reveal an unfolding agenda and deliberate suppression of what was really being discovered in ancient America.”

In Genes, Giants, Monsters and Men, Joseph Farrell comes to a similar conclusion, comparing the Smithsonian to NASA:

If there is a common motivation here between the two government agencies, then I am bold to suggest that it lies in the common factor they each share, namely that the existence of technological artifacts, of the skeletal remains of giants, and other anomalies, tended to corroborate that which ancient texts and traditions had always maintained: that there once was such a sophisticated civilization, that mankind himself is its deliberately engineered creation, and there were once such things as giants. In short, anomalous evidence from space, and archaeological evidence from the Earth, that tended to corroborate such ancient myths, had to be suppressed.

As with the other topics discussed in these series, there is also a relevant military-whisteblower account. Stephen Quayle first discussed the “Kandahar Giant” on Coast to Coast in 2008. He had received a letter from a U.S. military pilot who claimed to have flown the body of a 12-foot tall, cannibalistic giant out of Afghanistan, which had killed a special forces group hunting the Taliban in 2005. Quayle and Timothy Alberino interviewed the still active-duty pilot, who told how he had been tasked with flying the giant carcass out of Bagram Airfield to Qatar.

The cave-dwelling, red-haired, pale-skinned giant had reportedly been “venerated” by the locals. American special forces, suspecting the villagers were aiding the Taliban, checked out the cave in question. According to the pilot, the rumor was that the giant killed the entire first team. When the second team arrived, he was feeding on the bodies of the dead soldiers. They succeeded in killing the giant and airlifting him to Bagram via helicopter, where intelligence officers instructed the pilot, “no cameras, nobody’s taking any pictures here, we’re moving some high-value stuff.”

Alberino, who claims to have had the story confirmed to him by multiple military sources, writes:

The Kandahar giant story is 100% legit. I personally interviewed the [C-130] pilot who transported the dead body of the giant out of Bagram Airfield. He weighed [1100] pounds. He had red hair and six fingers. I’m betting that body is presently soaking in a vat of formaldehyde at Wright-Patterson.

In 2016, L.A. Marzulli interviewed one of the soldiers claiming to have helped kill and capture the giant (though he says it happened in 2002), and another who heard the story secondhand while serving in Afghanistan and also claimed the locals would tell American troops about the giant cannibals who lived in caves.

Further Reading

• Stephen Quayle: Genesis 6 Giants: Master Builders of Prehistoric and Ancient Civilizations (2002)

• Ross Hamilton: A Tradition of Giants: The Elite Social Hierarchy of American Prehistory (2007)

• Fritz Zimmerman: The Nephilim Chronicles: Fallen Angels in the Ohio Valley (2012)

• Patrick Chouinard: Lost Race of the Giants: The Mystery of Their Culture, Influence, and Decline throughout the World (2013)

• Richard J. Dewhurst: The Ancient Giants Who Ruled America: The Missing Skeletons and the Great Smithsonian Cover-Up (2013)

• Jim Vieira and Hugh Newman: Giants on Record: America’s Hidden History, Secrets in the Mounds and the Smithsonian Files (2015)

• Fritz Zimmerman: The Encyclopedia of Ancient Giants in North America (2015)

• Xaviant Haze: Ancient Giants: History, Myth, and Scientific Evidence from around the World (2018)

• Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira: The Giants of Stonehenge and Ancient Britain (2021)

Background

The biblical account of the Nephilim is brief. All we learn is that they were the product of interbreeding between the “sons of God” (or “Watchers” in the longer account in the Book of Enoch) and human women, and that they were “the heroes of old, warriors of renown.” While there is some question as to the origin and translation of the word, Michael Heiser argued that it was borrowed from the Aramaic word for giant (naphiyl), thus why the Septuagint translators chose the word gigantes as its Greek equivalent.

In later parts of the narrative, several races of giants are mentioned (presumably descendants of the Nephilim), including the Rephaim, Zuzim, Emim, Amorites and Anakim. Goliath was said to be a Philistine from Gath, one of the regions where Anakim remained.

October 23, 1994

Q: (L) Was Goliath, who was killed by David, one of the Nephilim?

A: Yes. In legend. Actual event depicted in story was earlier.

Q: (L) Was it actually David and Goliath?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Did he actually slay him with a stone from a slingshot?

A: Close.

If the story is as old as would be suggested by the dates given below, it is much older than the cultural memory of the Israelites and thus probably not “actually” of David and Goliath proper. The most likely direct source for the legend is Greek literature. Russell Gmirkin writes:

As is well known, the battle of David and Goliath, which has close literary parallels to battles between opposing champions in Homer’s Iliad [e.g. Menelaus vs. Paris, Nestor vs. the giant Ereuthalion], had Goliath dressed in the full traditional armor of the hoplite warrior, and even assigned the Philistine a shield-carrier. David rejected similar armaments, preferring the agile fighting style of the Greek light infantry (which included slingers). David appeared in the guise of an ephebe or youthful warrior-in-training.

As for giants in general:

The term derives (through Latin) from the Giants (Gigantes) of Greek mythology, who were monstrous, savage creatures often depicted with men’s bodies terminating in serpentine legs. According to the Greek poet Hesiod, they were sons of Ge (“Earth”) and Uranus (“Heaven”). The Gigantomachy was a desperate struggle between the Giants and the Olympians. The gods finally prevailed through the aid of Heracles the archer, and the Giants were slain.

As for the origin of the Greek myth, and the specific theme of the individual giant killer, either it was a common occurrence the world over, or, per Witzel’s Laurasian hypothesis, it spread from a common source at a time when all these groups shared a common cultural ancestor, e.g. the Proto-Indo-Europeans. In many of the legends, the hero has to rely on his wit, skill or divine aid to defeat the giant, and he does so using a precision weapon such as a slingshot, arrow or stone (e.g. David, Heracles, Lugh).

May 7, 2016

Q: (L) The giants [of the First Book of Enoch] seemed to be a variation on the Greek mythology of the Titans. Is that correct?

A: Yes.

Gmirkin writes:

In Greek myths, the human offspring of the gods, such as the hero Heracles, the child of Zeus and the mortal woman Alcmene, were portrayed as possessing extraordinary size and strength and doing mighty deeds. […] It seems likely that the traditional understanding of the Nephilim as storybook giants […] and the similar role of the mighty Titan Atlas in Greek myths converged to influence the translation of Nephilim as gigantes in Gen 6:4 (LXX).

Origin

According to the Cassiopaeans, the “Nephalim” (as they consistently spell it) are a third-density, ET race “who were taken, or […] kidnapped, reprogrammed and retrained by the Lizard beings to act as enforcers during a particular era” of our past (1994-10-22) – “slaves” of Orion (1994-10-23). The name of their planet was called “Dorlaqua,” “located in the Orion complex” (1994-10-22), also referred to as “Planet 3C, or 3rd star, 3rd planet” (1994-10-23) and possibly “D’Ankhiar”:

October 23, 1994

Q: (L) You said the other night that the Nephilim came from some area around the constellation Scorpio [which is next to Orion], is that correct?

A: Originally seeded there but you were too.

Q: (L) We were originally seeded somewhere else? Where? Orion? What is the name of that planet?

A: D’Ankhiar. Ankh is ancient symbolism of this planet. Is female symbol. Stands for mother planet. [Ankh is Egyptian for “life.”]

Q: (L) Is this other planet our original home?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) What is it like back home?

A: Spent. Cindered. Burned up.

Q: (L) So it’s true, you can’t go home?

A: Yes.

November 2, 1994

Q: (L) Who carved the stone heads on Easter Island?

A: Lemurian descendants. [Probably a reference to Sundaland.]

Q: (L) The natives say the stones walked into position. Is this true?

A: No.

Q: (L) Well, how?

A: Tonal vibration.

Q: (L) And what did these stones represent?

A: Nephalim.

Q: (L) Is this what the Nephilim looked like?

A: Close.

The carved heads (moai) on Easter Island share stylistic similarities to the carvings at other ancient sites, including Tiwanaku and Gobekli Tepe, dated to 9600 BC (or around 1,000 years older than that [2025-4-26].) The Easter Islanders’ script also overlaps with that of the Indus-Sarasvati.

As Hancock summarizes in Magicians of the Gods (2015), radiocarbon dating puts the earliest identifiable human activity on Easter Island at around 318 AD, and the moai are believed to have been constructed between 690 and 1650 AD. Accepting these results, Hancock speculates that the island’s natives may not have been the first to live there and that the moai and other megalithic structures may have been there when they arrived from Polynesia – remnants of a prior occupation when the sea levels were lower and Easter Island was just one of an extensive chain of mountain-islands in that stretch of the Pacific. (Robert Shoch cites the amount of sediment burying some of the statues – as much as 9 meters – as evidence of their great antiquity.)

Q: (L) Now, you said that the Nephilim were seeded on a planet called D’Ankhiar, as were human beings. When you said we were seeded there, what did you mean?

A: Was proper environment for molecularization.

Q: (L) Are you saying that the physical bodies on planet Earth – the various types of mankind such as Neanderthal, Cro-Magnon, Australopithecus, etc. – were generated on that other planet and then brought here?

A: Yes.

It is not clear if D’Ankhiar was intended to refer to the planet where both species were originally seeded, or just humanity (the wider “Orion complex” being where all the seeding took place). Alternately, the word sounding like “Dorlaqua” in the earlier trance session may have been a distorted version of “D’Ahnkiar.”

In line with the biblical representation, these beings were “giants,” 11 to 14 feet tall (1994-10-20), the tallest of them reaching 15 feet (1994-10-23). By contrast, modern American males range from around 5–6.5 feet. Despite their size, these beings were close to us in physical appearance, including their reproductive organs, though they allegedly had “three gonads” and the size of the male genitalia made normal sexual relations with human women unfeasible (1994-10-20). Their intelligence was similar to ours, but they had physical problems here because of our gravity, making living here difficult (1994-10-23). (Farrell quotes Christian and Barbara Joy O’Brien as arguing that Yahweh is implied in the Old Testament to have been between 8 and 13 feet tall. In the Epic of Gilgamesh, its eponymous hero is described as being 18 feet tall.)

November 4, 1994

Q: (L) What kind of weapons do the Nephilim use to do their “enforcing”?

A: Stun guns.

Q: (L) Do they actually use some kind of material weapon?

A: Yes.

History

The time periods in one of the early trance sessions (1994-10-22) are self-contradictory and conflict with answers given in other sessions. When asked what era the Nephilim came to act as enforcers, two date ranges were given, with additional ones implied: approximately 6000 to 3000 BC, and 12,000 to 10,000 BC before that. However, when asked for how long these beings existed on Earth, they answered only “approximately 1500 to 1800 years.” And when asked when the last of them died off, they answered: “Probably near 6 to 7 thousand years ago” (1,000 to 2,000 years before the end of the first date range) and added: “But there is also a reference point of 12 to 14 thousand years” (matching the second date range given). When asked this same question at the next session, the answer was that they died off by approximately 6000 BC, i.e. 8,000 years ago (1994-10-23).

In another session, they gave 9046 BC as one reference for the Nephilim’s arrival (1994-10-20), which falls between the two date ranges given during the trance session. When asked again when they were “originally” brought here, the answer was approximately 12,000 BC (“one reference”) (1994-10-23). In another session, they said the Nephilim “have been here 5 times” and that they “will return.” In response to a statement referring to the Nephilim being brought here “9 to 12 thousand years ago” (a misstatement of previous dates given, i.e. 9046 BC and 12,000 BC), they said this was their “last visit” (1994-11-2). If we disregard the years given in the trance session, this gives us a few dates:

• 12,000 BC: arrival (the same date given for the inception of the undergrounders, between the 14.4 kya and 12.9 kya cataclysms; this places the Nephilim here at the time of Atlantis, an idea put forward by both Rudolf Steiner and Edgar Cayce)

• 9046 BC: another arrival (implied last visit)

• 6000 BC: die out

Genetic Experimentation

October 22, 1994 (trance channeling)

A: They [the Nephalim] died off because they were not able to reproduce naturally in the atmosphere of the Earth and experimentation to try to cause them to intermix with the human population did not succeed.

October 20, 1994

Q: They were presented to the people as the representatives, or “sons” of God, is that correct?

A: Yes.

Q: You and the ancient literature say that these sons of God intermarried with human women, is that correct? [According to the Bible, the Nephilim were the offspring of such mating.]

A: Yes.

Q: Did they do that the same way it is done today, that is, sexual interaction?

A: No.

Q: How was it done?

A: Forced insemination.

Q: So, it was artificial insemination?

A: Close.

November 16, 1994

Q: (L) In referring to the Nephilim, you used the term “forced insemination.” How does this differ from artificial insemination?

A: No difference.

Q: (L) At the time of the Tower of Babel, it says that the Nephilim looked on the daughters of men and took wives, as if there were some friendly interaction of some sort. Does this mean they broke ranks and had feelings for their human “wives”?

A: No. Another deception of history. Picturesque way of describing genetic experiments.

In the myths, the divine council (e.g. apkallu and bene elohim), presumably all male, produced hybrid/giant offspring by mating with women. DeLonge and Levenda comment on perhaps another cargo-cult imitation of past practices: “The loss of contact with these supernatural beings was lamented in the Sumerian hymns and incantations. Rituals evolved to bring them back, at least temporarily, using sacrifices and sacred marriages.”

October 23, 1994

Q: (L) Were these Nephilim genetically intermixed with human beings?

A: Temporarily.

Q: (L) Why only temporarily?

A: DNA conflict.

February 24, 1996

Q: (L) Are there any human beings on Earth at the present time who carry in them the Nephilim genes?

A: Yes. […]

Q: (L) Would these Nephilim genetics be passed down in the natural way, or would they be the result of genetic manipulation by genetically altering a fetus and then putting it back?

A: No to latter. One clue: double Y chromosomes [i.e. Jacobs syndrome].

Q: (W) That’s male…

A: Nephalim were.

Q: (L) They were male. Women are a double X, men are XY.

A: Prisons are filled with double Y’s with monstrous personality disorders, almost always Caucasian and over-sized. Also, “bikers” often carry the gene. […]

Q: (L) On TV they interviewed a serial killer. He was huge! He described killing. The shrink who was analyzing said he did it because he wanted to get caught. I did not get that feeling. I think he did it just because it was what he did. […] Is there any other clue you can give?

A: Nephalim are not currently on your world, just trace residuals.

October 20, 1994

Q: Who built the city of Baalbek?

A: [Atlanteans] and early Sumerians. […]

Q: What happened to interrupt or halt the building of this city?

A: Venus first appearance and pass.

Q: What year was this project brought to a halt?

A: 3218 B.C.

At this time, the Early Bronze Age, the area around Baalbek in modern Lebanon was occupied by Canaanites (worshipers of Baal), and Mesopotamia was dominated by the pre-Sumerians of the late Uruk period, with the city of Uruk as a major urban center. Baalbek shows signs of human settlement going back 10,000 years and occupied a strategic position along trade routes connecting Mesopotamia with Egypt and Anatolia, with which Uruk engaged in trade.

While Baalbek itself is commonly believed to have been built solely by Romans, Hancock argues that it could be much older and that the Romans merely made use of its already existing megalithic structures. These consist of three walls, the shortest of which contains three massive blocks weighing up to 800 tons each: the Trilithon. Within these walls the Romans built the Temple of Jupiter – part of a complex with two other temples, one to Bacchus and the other to Venus.

The site has signs of Herodian, Roman and Arab construction and repairs, with Hancock speculating that only the massive stones represent a pre-existing structure. Despite various theories for who constructed the megalithic base, a mystery remains: why it was never completed. Three additional blocks (the third only discovered in 2014), more massive than those of the Trilithon and the largest in antiquity, were in the state of being quarried about a kilometer from the site. Hancock believes these blocks – which weigh 970, 1,242 and 1,650 tons – were “intended to sit on top of the northern and southern arms of the U-shaped wall, thus raising them to the height that the western wall attained with the placement of the Trilithon.”

Source

In Magicians of the Gods (2015), Hancock quotes David Urquhart’s History and Diary of the region, in which Urquhart quotes the then Emir of Baalbek as telling him: “The magalithic work had been done at the command of two different rules in the primeval period before the Flood: ‘And then came the Deluge. After that it was repaired by Solomon.’”

Lescaudron summarizes the evidence for a Venus-related catastrophe at this time in Cometary Encounters. This includes: sulfate and methane peaks, dendrochronological and ice core data showing a significant drop in global temperatures, dramatic flooding of the Mesopotamian and Nile deltas and the Dead Sea region, and the collapse of various cultures and civilizations (e.g. Uruk, northern Egypt, Indus, Yangshao) and subsequent rapid emergence of technological societies in Egypt, Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley.

Q: What is the reason for the enormous proportions of this building?

A: Giants.

Q: Who were the giants?

A: Genetic effort to recreate Nephalim.

Hancock quotes Estfan El Douaihy, the Maronite Patriarch of Lebanon from the late 1600s, who said Baalbek was “peopled with giants who were punished for their inquities by the Flood.”

Other traditions implicate demons [i.e. djinn] in the placing of the megaliths, and an Arabic manuscript echoes the story Urquhart was told about an attempt to rebuild Baalbek after the Flood. In this account it was not Solomon but Nimrod, the great grandson of Noah, who sent giants to repair the damaged walls.

Q: Did the Atlanteans and Sumerians succeed in recreating the Nephilim?

A: No. […] Retarded subjects.

Q: The results of their efforts were retarded?

A: Yes.

Q: Why did they build the enormous city?

A: In anticipation of success.

Q: Why would someone come along and build a city of the proportions of Baalbek in anticipation of a genetic project that could take many years to accomplish?

A: Project took only three years. Speeded up growth cycle using nuclear hormonal replication procedure. Why failed.

Q: That’s why it failed, because of the speeded-up growth?

A: Did not take properly.

The Return

November 2, 1994

Q: (L) The Nephilim are going to return? Where do the Nephilim currently live?

A: Orion.

Q: (L) They live in the constellation Orion? Where is their planet?

A: Don’t have one. In transit.

Q: (L) The whole dadgum bunch is in transit?

A: Three vehicles.

Q: (L) How many Nephilim does each vehicle hold?

A: About 12 million.

Q: (L) Are they coming to help us?

A: No. Wave[,] comet cluster[,] all using same energy.

Q: (L) Using same energy to what?

A: Pass through spacetime. […]

Q: (L) Now, you say these Nephilim are coming and there are about 36 million of them, correct?

A: Yes. […]

Q: (L) Are they 4th-density beings?

A: No. They live in 4D but are 3D. They are as physical as you. Behave like Gestapo. Gestapo was inspired by Nephilim through Lizard beings’ influence over Hitler. It was a practice run.

Q: (L) Are any of the Nephilim going to be friendly toward us?

A: No. […]

Q: (L) I am assuming that if the Nephilim are 3D that they die like we do. Is this correct?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) So, we can shoot them and they will die?

A: Correct. But wrong approach.

Q: (L) What is the right approach?

A: Knowledge protects.

Q: (L) Well, if a 15-foot-tall guy comes at me and wants to knock me around, what is knowledge going to do to protect me?

A: You will be in 4th density.

Q: (L) So, before they get here we will be 4D?

A: Crossing.

Q: (L) All three of us?

A: Yes, and many others.

Q: (L) So, we are not going to have to deal with the Nephilim?

A: Not correct.

Q: (L) Does this mean that there will be 3 and 4D beings on the planet at the same time and that some will have to deal with these guys and some won’t?

A: But you will have to too.

Q: (L) I don’t understand. Are these Nephilim coming here to transition to 4D also?

A: They already live there as 3-density beings. Demonstration: When you are abducted you are 3rd density but you are taken into 4th density.

September 24, 1995

Q: (L) What were the purposes of the STS forces that were controlling Hitler, causing him to desire to annihilate an entire group of people?

A: To create an adequate “breeding ground” for the reintroduction of the Nephalim, for the purpose of total control of the 3rd-density Earth prior to elevation to 4th density, where such conquest is more difficult and less certain!

October 7, 1995

Q: (L) They [the Nazis] were preparing this breeding ground [with their “master race”], so to speak. Obviously this was for the introduction of some other genetic strain. What was this?

A: Nephalim.

Q: (L) Well, if the Nephilim are coming in ships, 36 million of them, why bother to create half-breeds here?

A: Yes, but having an “advance party” makes 3rd-density conquest much easier.

July 29, 2006

Q: (Perceval) Over 11 years ago you said that the Nazi master race idea was for the purposes of creating a breeding ground for the reintroduction of the Nephilim for total control of 3rd density prior to elevation to 4th, and that this failed. At the time, Laura asked what their plan was now, and you said that you could not say because she would seek to reveal it, leading to her destruction. So my question is, with mirth, have we evolved to a high-enough degree that we can know now?

A: You already figured it out.

Q: [Everyone looks to Perceval as though he figured something out.] (Perceval) Well, I didn’t really figure anything out, I was just thinking about it and decided that the new plan was to introduce the psychopaths in order to effect the total control of the planet along certain lines.

A: And “culling” the non-psychopaths.

August 27, 2022

Q: (irjO) We now know that the enforcers for the STS 4D beings in our realm are psychopaths and other pathological individuals. But is it still true that there are 3 ships with Nephilim coming this way, as stated before in one of the early sessions?

A: Yes.

DeLonge and Levenda highlight this psychological connection in Gods (2016):

From the point of view of psychology, there is no conceivable way one would be able to assess the mental health or illness of an alien species. The planet could be invaded by the alien equivalent of psychopaths and there would be no way for us to know. The giants and monstrosities recorded in the Book of Giants as well as the slim account of the Nephilim in Genesis need not be understood solely in terms of physical abnormalities. […] The monstrosities of the pre-Flood era may have been psychological monstrosities as well as, or in place of, physical abnormalities. Certainly, from a modern perspective, the actions of the “giants” could be interpreted as sociopathic. The sexual proclivities of the angels—their parents—would be construed as deviant and criminal behavior today: incest, bestiality, etc. Considering that the angels—the bene elohim of Genesis—are the “sons of God,” it stands to reason that there is a genetic circumstance which contributes to this psychopathic behavior. […] It was only when [humans] mated with angels that the dysmorphism occurred and it seems to have survived in isolated pockets of the gene pool after the Flood. […] Was the biblical gigantism the result of a chromosomal factor, such as may be caused by consanguinity?

July 29, 2023

Q: (thorbiorn) These Nephilim on the way, will they use some of these portals like in Ukraine, Middle East, etc., as their preferred landing spots?

A: Yes. […] But not necessary.

More Giants

March 13, 2021

Q: (Joe) Who made the stone jars that litter the landscape in Laos [conventionally dated to the Bronze Age, as early as 1240 to 660 BC]?

A: Race of hominids no longer extant.

Q: (Joe) What was the purpose of the jars?

A: Storage.

Q: (Artemis) Were they big people or normal sized?

A: Giants.

Q: (Andromeda) How did they transport them?

A: Technology. Think “Coral Castle”.

Q: […] (Joe) Did they store grain in them to make beer? […]

A: Some. [According to local legend, the jars were made after military victory by the king Khun Cheung, to brew and store large quantities of rice alcohol.]

Q: (Joe) They were big drinkers, I see. (Laughter) (L) So I guess we should just think about the fact that there’s so much evidence of higher technologies, races of giants on the planet […] It’s also covered up. Look at that Smithsonian business. […] Even within recorded history, there were giants discovered living on some – like Patagonia […] – that have died out. Of course, there’s some evidence that there were some gigantic types still on the Canary Islands and in the Americas that had double rows of teeth. (Joe) They found giant axes in various places too.

A: Indeed. The true history of your planet is little known. Refer to collections made by your Mr. Hancock.

Q: […] (Joe) Is it true that the really tall giants – like 13 or 15 feet – were they alive under the same gravitational conditions as we have today?

A: Not exactly. Conditions on your planet changed significantly at the time of the destruction of the Roman Empire. Giants from that time forward faced increasingly difficult conditions and survival became untenable. [Archaeologists have discovered 8 shoes over 30 cm in length (U.S. size 14) at Magna Fort, near Hadrian’s Wall.]

Q: (L) So there were some still left in pockets, is that it?

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) Those were the ones discovered by explorers after the Dark Ages. (Chu) Did they have a language we might be familiar with if they lived that recently?

A: Yes […] Similar to Basque.

Q: (Andromeda) Like Atlantean. […] (Joe) So, gravity was less, let’s say, to make it easy for them to…

A: Yes. Also electrical charge of planet.

In a section titled “Electromagnetic Energies and Giantism,” Vieira and Newman quote a paper by 3 Japanese scientists at Kyoto University arguing that electromagnetic fields “exert an effect on skeleton size via alteration of the proliferation and activity of bone cells.” They even theorize that the size of dinosaurs was “caused by ELF-EMFs generated by natural phenomena: geomagnetic storms, volcanic activity, earthquakes, or Schumann resonance.” (Based on other research, Vieira and Newman speculate that the mounds may have been “deliberately designed and constructed to replicate or enhance these energies.”) According to Bergmann’s rule, higher and lower latitudes are also associated with larger body sizes, perhaps due to the fact that the Earth’s geomagnetic field is almost twice as strong at the poles. (Recall the Patagonian giants.) They note that DNA may also be affected, with promotion of ATP synthesis supporting larger body sizes.

They also quote A Comprehensive Theory on Aging, Giantism and Longevity (1979), where Donald Patten noted the rapid diminution of the megafauna, which he ascribed to “a radical change in environmental conditions,” i.e. much higher carbon dioxide levels. They conclude: “With increasing carbon dioxide emissions, human hybridization, and a new understanding of earth energies in our current society, perhaps gigantism might be coming back, whether we like it or not. The time of the Tall Ones may be upon us once more.”

Q: (L) That reminds me of all the really peculiar electrical phenomena recorded in the ancient Greco-Roman records that seemed to sort of stop when records picked up again after the destruction of the ancient world. But, of course, there were periods when things were really weird even after that. So the people before the end of the Roman Empire were seeing a lot more of our plasma men than we would see nowadays?

A: Yes.

Q: (Andromeda) But the giants lived alongside little people then?

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) And was life easier for normal people then, as well?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) It had probably been in decline beginning from even earlier periods…

A: Yes.

Q: (L) So that was the last big change I guess, something like 540 AD [another date associated with a possible cometary catastrophe]. (Joe) In the reports of explorers after the Roman Empire going and finding giants and stuff, if they fought with the giants, it seems they were relatively easily defeated, as they were big and slow. (L) They probably weren’t able to deal with the environmental conditions. (Andromeda) Were they stupid?

A: Not at first.

Q: (L) But they became stupid as their health declined in the environmental changes?

A: Yes.

Q: (Chu) They had to be pretty smart if they had the technology to move stones. (L) Yeah, but that would have been earlier. Well, didn’t the Denisovans have extremely large teeth? Were they connected in some way to the giants?

A: Yes. Connected but not identical.

While Neanderthals are known to have been relatively short, and Cro-Magnons relatively large (with some specimens allegedly over 7 feet), a complete Denisovan skeleton has yet to be discovered. While the molar discovered in 2000 is about 1.4 times the size of a normal human’s, tooth size isn’t always correlated with height. However, a Denisovan finger bone discovered in 2008 is “unusually broad and robust, well outside the variation seen in modern people,” and a mandible only recently confirmed as Denisovan is about 1.5 times larger than the average human. Vieira and Newman note that such discoveries could imply Denisovans were up to 9 feet tall.

Scientists also recently confirmed as Denisovan a nearly complete skull (the Chinese “dragon man” skull) first discovered in 1933 but hidden until 2018, which Smithsonian Magazine described as “a huge male with flat cheeks and prominent facial features: a large mouth, strong brow ridges, a round nose and a big brain.”

Denisovan skull

Biblical

Ancient astronaut interpretations of the Bible began in the 1950s and are still common. Some notable books include:

• 1956: Morris K. Jessup (UFO and the Bible)

• 1961: Jean Sendy (Those Gods Who Made Heaven and Earth)

• 1968: Barry Downing (The Bible and Flying Saucers)

• 1969: Robert Dione (God Drives a Flying Saucer)

• 1989: Zecharia Sitchin (Genesis Revisited)

A number of sessions from October 1994 deal with events from the Old Testament. However, the historicity of these events was assumed at the outset, possibly influencing the quality of the answers. They are included below with minimal commentary.

October 5, 1994

Q: (L) What was the event a hundred or so years after the flood of Noah that was described as the confusing of languages, or the Tower of Babel?

A: Spiritual confluence.

Q: (L) What purpose did the individuals who came together to build the tower intend for said tower?

A: Electromagnetic concentration of all gravity waves.

Q: (L) And what did they intend to do with these concentrated waves?

A: Mind alteration of masses. [In Genes, Giants, Monsters and Men, citing the work of German enginer Konstantin Meyl, Farrell argues that ancient temple complexes, due to their architectural forms, functioned not only as “sophisticated radio transmitters,” but also as psychotronic “mind manipulation environments.”]

Q: (L) What intention did they have in altering the mind of the masses?

A: Spiritual unification of the masses.

Q: (L) Who were the “gods” that looked down on the Tower of Babel, at those who were building it with the intention of unification, and decided to destroy their works?

A: Lizards.

Q: (L) OK, so the Lizzies blew up the Tower of Babel. What else did they do to the minds of mankind? Did they do something causing literal disruption of their understanding of language?

A: Close.

Q: (L) What tool did they use to accomplish this divisiveness?

A: Brainwashing of masses.

Q: (L) Did they do this through implants and abduction?

A: Partly.

Q: (L) How were Sodom and Gomorrah destroyed and the other cities of the plain? And by whom?

A: Nuclear; EM pulse. Who else?

Q: (L) The Lizzies?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Why?

A: To implant fear and obedience.

A team of scientists led by archaeologist Phillip J. Silvia argue that an overhead meteor airburst destroyed the cities and farming settlements in the Middle Ghor, a 25-kilometer plain north of the Dead Sea, around 1600 BC. The sites had been continuously occupied for thousands of years prior, but took 600–700 years to be repopulated after the destruction. The city with the most extensive destruction was Tell el-Hammam, which some scholars identify as the biblical Sodom.

Q: (L) Weren’t the Sodom and Gomorrans really evil and bad, doing sodomy and Gomorrahy?

A: That is a deception of history.

Q: (L) Did Lot’s wife get turned into a pillar of salt?

A: No.

Q: (L) Is there any symbolism in that particular story for us today?

A: No.

Q: (L) Was the god who communicated with Abraham one of the Lizzies?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Was the pact that Abraham made with the Lizzies?

A: Yes. Not directly.

October 7, 1994

Q: (L) What did the snake or the “tempter” represent?

A: Forces known to you as Lizzies […]

Q: (L) Who gave John Revelation?

A: The Lizzies. […]

Q: (L) Who was the god that spoke to Moses on the mount?

A: Audible projection of Lizards.

Q: (L) Did Moses at any time realize that he had been duped by the Lizzies?

A: No.

October 16, 1994

Q: (L) Where did Moses get his knowledge?

A: Us.

Q: (L) OK, you told us before that he saw or interacted with a holographic projection created by the Lizard beings. Was that the experience on Mount Sinai?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) OK, well, if he got knowledge from you, did he get this prior to the interactions with the Lizard beings?

A: Yes. He was corrupted by imagery. He was deceived by the imagery à la Joseph Smith, for example.

Q: (L) Are you saying that Joseph Smith, the recipient of the Mormon texts, was deceived by the Lizards also?

A: Yes. They do that a lot. […] Brotherhood aka Lizards aka antichrist has interfered with free will for 309,000 years. […]

Q: (L) You say that following the enforcement of control by the Lizzies on the entire world that the change is going to take place. Is that correct?

A: Yes. […]

Q: (L) And who is this Beast [of Revelation]?

A: New World Order aka Brotherhood aka Lizzies aka antichrist.

October 18, 1994

Q: (L) Who was it who appeared to Ezekiel?

A: Lizard beings. [Morris K. Jessup was one of the first ancient astronaut theorists to propose that Ezekiel’s wheel was a UFO.]

October 20, 1994

Q: What happened to the army of Sennacherib? [In the Old Testament, the Neo-Assyrian king’s army was destroyed during the night by an angel of the Lord during their siege of Jerusalem.]

A: Destroyed by cosmic rays energy concentration by Lizards.

Next: Crash Retrievals and Reverse Engineering