Ancient Aliens Part 2: Temples and Serpent Gods

Alien Races Part 5b

Many of the original ancient astronaut theorists, confronted by megalithic structures such as the Great Pyramid, Stonehenge, Teotihuacán, Baalbek and the fact that they seem to have required technology or techniques we lack today, ascribed their construction to the work of advanced extraterrestrials. While many subsequently criticized these theories as downplaying the possible ingenuity of humanity at those times, the C’s perspective lies somewhere in the middle, giving credit to humans for several ancient structures (such as Baalbek, Gobekli Tepe, Stonehenge, Chaco Canyon, Teotihuacán and the Nazca lines) and attributing others to direct 4D manufacture (Tiwanaku, Mohenjo-daro, Angkor Wat, the Barabar caves).

These theorists also commonly took ancient myth and legend at face value, presuming the reality of various heavenly gods and heroes and equating them with ETs. After all, the perception of “beings that have hominid features and characteristics” as somehow non-human, DeLonge and Levenda note, is nearly universal.

Naturally, ancient religion fit into this picture, as already seen in several of the sources already quoted. Most recently, DeLonge and Levenda have developed this idea at length in the first volume of their Sekret Machines trilogy: Gods. There, they draw on the evidence of ancient texts concerning heavenly beings (sky people, sky gods), humanity’s relation to them, their reputed civilizing influence, the stone structures believed to connect to them and the heavens, and notions of non-human contact, immortality and altered states of consciousness. Their thesis is that ancient religions are essentially archaic cargo cults, ritualistic attempts to recreate the dynamics of paleocontact. As they write:

No matter which source one consults, […] from the dusty cuneiform tablets of the Sumerians to the popular texts of the ancient astronaut theorists, one thing seems consistent: religion as we know it has its origins—either in reality or in fantasy—in the stars, and there seems to be an agreement that humans have a divine (or at least astral) origin.

They apply this argument to several different traditions, including shamanism, Jewish Merkava (i.e. “chariot”) mysticism, ceremonial magic and the religions of ancient Mesopotamia, Mexico, Egypt, China, India and Greece. The rituals in question seem like instruction manuals for alien contact, often with the goal of heavenly “ascent.”

It is as if a cult had developed around Kenneth Arnold’s sighting in 1947, or the experience of George Adamski a few years later, by people who would imitate as closely as possible the circumstances of the original sighting. In other words, it is not to be understood as “spiritual” in the generally accepted sense of the term, but as a technology whose aim is to duplicate the original experience by adopting many of its features. Like the cargo cults […], what is happening is what appears to be a ritual on the one hand and a practical exercise on the other.

For example, in the Tibetan Buddhist practice of Kalachakra Tantra, the “suppression of physical and emotional desires,” they argue, “may be related to a desire or need to emulate the perceived state of non-terrestrial contacts” (e.g. the Grays). By extension, many such practices may be similarly imitative of non-human contacts, such as skull elongation, circumcision, anointing, clothing design and perhaps even language and alphabets. John Keel writes in Our Haunted Planet (1971):

The indigenous natives of the Americas, Africa, and the Pacific all adopted ceremonial dress patterned after the garb of the ultraterrestrials, just as the robes and trappings of the early churches of the white man were patterned after the dress of the angels and gods who allegedly visited them.

Another such imitation seems to be the notion of divine kingship, reflecting a time when the “sons of the gods” ruled Earth, married human wives, and their offspring became heroes and kings. “It is the idea of sovereignty and authority as deriving not from humans or human institutions but from otherworldly sources that suggests trace evidence of contact,” DeLonge and Levenda write. Keel speculated on the existence of an advanced “superculture” that “appeared before primitive man and took over as kings and god-kings to direct his early development.” He expanded on this idea in a column written in 1975, where he played with the idea that these beings were an ancient human race, writing:

Were these Watchers gods, as the first men thought them to be, or were they astronauts from some distant planet? There is one other possible explanation: they were earthlings being from a splendid continent separated and protected by the oceans from the hostile jungles of the cave men. These beings thrived in a land where magic and technology were one. Their flying machines spanned the world and they watched with detachment as the man-animals appeared and multiplied.

Later, as Man spread slowly across the landscape, the Watchers came forward from the skies and from the seas to offer gentle assistance. They taught men to farm, and gave them the fundamentals of law, architecture, and mathematics. Man, in turn, dedicated his greatest works to these gods. He carved their images from blocks of stones. The arts of the dance, painting, and story-telling all began as a means of paying tribute to the wondrous Watchers.

Then an element of evil was introduced. The Watchers initially demanded animal sacrifices, and then human sacrifices. They claimed credit for natural disasters and men began to fear them. Around the world great pyramids were built, and choice young women were left in the temples at special times of the year. The gods came down from the sky and, according to legend, mated with the human women. These women bore special children, giants with incredible physical and psychic strength who assumed command of tribes and whole nations. The world was divided into a score of zones or kingdoms, each ruled by one of these hybrid kings. To preserve their godly lineage, the royal families intermarried but the Watchers retained subtle control by appearing frequently before the kings and issuing orders, even laying the plans of battle for ancient wars. Men were disciplined to obey the kings and their gods without question. In a real sense, these gods owned the Earth and had direct control over all its inhabitants through the god-king system; a system which was still in effect in many parts of the world into the 20th Century.

Horn asserts that this system continues to influence us today:

Right from the start, the Sumerian “gods” gave humans a strongly hierarchical governmental system designed so that a few “elite” at the top of society could control the masses at the bottom of society. […] What terrible “imprints” of how to run a civilization we humans were provided! […] We are living in an alienated […], divided, and controlled society.

On the nature of these “gods,” Kerner writes:

These deities promulgate a divinity of merely local significance—that of the physical universe. They compel things to be as they want them to be through physical force, even violence. Such gods seem like supreme egocentrics, exacting revenge, seeking supplication and praise, and applying physical punishment.

Horn further speculates that “regressive ETs” are able to influence humanity “through the collective unconscious,” perhaps through direct influence on humanity’s “morphic fields” – Rupert Sheldrake’s term for the nonphysical informational fields which influence human form and function (behavioral, emotional, mental). By establishing patterns of behavior, conditioned over thousands of years, such beings would thus be able to manipulate our beliefs and behaviors to align with their goals.

October 25, 1994

Q: (L) What was the origin of the serpent god?

A: Lizard rule.

As DeLonge and Levenda note in Gods: “The association of serpents and dragons with divinity would be retained as late as the Gnostics of the first few centuries AD in their depictions of Abraxas and the Demiurge.” The Ubaid culture of southern Mesopotamia (modern-day Iraq), which immediately preceded the Sumerian civilization, crafted clay figurines of humanoid figures with reptile-like skin, large eyes and elongated heads (5500–3800 BC).

Recall that this region is said to have a large portal. According to Barbara Marciniak’s Pleiadians in Bringers of the Dawn:

To some extent, the Lizzies have controlled this portal. They have used this area to create their underground bases and caverns, from which they operate. The ancient civilization of Mesopotamia, between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, was a space colony where a certain civilization was introduced.

Direct divine rule in prehistory is present in many of the world’s myths. For example, prior to the unification of Egypt by Narmer ca. 3100 BC, Egypt was said to have been ruled directly by the gods, then demigods, for thousands of years.

Q: (L) What is the Enuma Elish really about?

A: Ascent.

Q: (L) Ascent of what?

A: Gods.

Q: (L) What gods were these?

A: Lizards.

The Enuma Elish is the Babylonian creation myth, which depicts the creation of humanity following a long battle between various gods. It also contains the story of the Tablet of Destinies, a device – worn as a breastplate – giving the god Marduk his kingship and authority over the other gods. It thus narrates the ascent of younger gods like Marduk to supreme authority, overcoming the chaotic primordial forces of Apsu and Tiamat.

December 10, 1994

Q: (L) What is buried on Oak Island? [See chapter 29 of The Wave for more on Oak Island.]

A: Regenerator [i.e.] remolecularizer.

Q: (L) Who put it there?

A: Lizard beings.

Q: (L) When did they put it there?

A: 10,000 years ago, approximately.

August 5, 1995 (direct channeling)

Q: (L) Who was Arajuna [?] of Tiwanaku?

A: […] one of approximately eight hybrids that ruled the area currently referred to as Central America [Tiwanaku is in South America], hybrids being a 4th-density to 3rd-density transfer experiment from the Lizard race to the human race, which was abandoned after approximately 240 years of experimentation by the Lizard beings, due to the lack of success for sustaining physical duplication or reproduction of the race. It was one of several attempts by the Lizard beings to directly transmit their souls into 3rd-density environment for permanent placement there.

During a session with Barbara Bartholic regarding his reptilian experiences, recounted in his book The Ultimate Alien Agenda (1998), James Walden stated that there was a time when such beings controlled the Earth: “They demanded absolute supremacy. However, only a few of them were present in the earliest days here. Only a few interdimensional reptilian astronauts colonized the Earth, and they had difficulty reproducing on this planet.”

Q: (L) Who built the city of Tiwanaku?

A: The Lizard beings in cooperation with humans.

Q: (L) When was it built?

A: Varying time frames, since it seems to have been destroyed at two points. We have to estimate an average of 8,000 years prior to the current time.

Conventionally dated to no later than 1,500 years ago, Graham Hancock cites Arthur Posnansky and Rolf Muller in Fingerprints of the Gods (1995), who dated Tiwanaku to approximately 15,000 BC, based on the site’s solar alignments. (The carvings there depict now-extinct animals from that time period.) They also argued that it “suffered immense destruction in a phenomenal natural catastrophe around the eleventh millennium BC” (i.e. around the time of the Younger Dryas impact ca. 12,900 years ago). In the following years of poor climate, the site shows evidence of complex and successful agricultural experiments and engineering.

The Inca civilization of Peru was said to have been founded by Viracocha (“Foam of the Sea”), the deity worshiped by all Peruvian cultures and whose capital city was Tiwanaku. Viracocha and his team of assistants were described as pale in complexion, lean, bearded, past middle age and wearing robes and sandals. After a great flood and much hardship, he arrived from the south instructing the natives how to live, healing and teaching all manner of skills: architecture, engineering, medicine, metallurgy, farming, animal husbandry and writing (the local Aymara language is unique in its logical syntax, suggesting it was deliberately constructed). He spoke the local language better than the natives and taught a humanitarian philosophy. He and his helpers eventually left by sea.

The sunken temple at Tiwanaku

August 29, 1998

Q: […] On page 80 [of Graham Hancock’s Fingerprints of the Gods], the book talks about these statues at Tiwanaku on Lake Titicaca. It says: “Carved in red sandstone, worn and ancient beyond reckoning, the statue [El Fraile] stood about six feet high, and portrayed a humanoid, androgynous being with massive eyes and lips. […] From the waist down the figure seemed to be clad in a garment of fish scales.” […] Why were these beings depicted with these fish-like garments?

A: Reptoids have that genetic profile to varying degrees.

El Fraile (The Friar).

October 7, 1994

Q: (L) What is the source of the Native American Indians?

A: Asia.

Q: (L) Across the Bering Strait?

A: No. Rescued. Transferred.

Q: (L) By whom?

A: Grays.

Q: (L) What were they rescued out of?

A: Cataclysm.

Q: (L) When did that cataclysm occur?

A: 7200 years ago approx.

Q: (L) What was the nature of that cataclysm?

A: Comets.

The Americas have in fact been populated for tens of thousands of years. Graham Hancock cites the latest archaeological discoveries in America Before (2019), which place humans on the continent 24,000 to 33,000 years ago, and perhaps even earlier. Current genetic evidence, both modern and ancient, suggests at least 4 “migrations” or founding populations, which David Reich summarizes in his book Who We Are and How We Got Here (2018):

• Population Y: Found in the Amazon, this group shares genes with Australians, New Guineans and Andamanese. It is currently impossible to estimate their time of entry, but Reich speculates they may have been the first to spread through South America, eventually being mostly displaced by the “First Americans.”

• First Americans: This group came to populate North, Central and South America and split off from their closest Eurasian relatives around 23,000 years ago. This is the group believed to have taken either a coastal or land-bridge/ice-free corridor route onto the continent.

• Paleo-Eskimo: Migrated out of Asia around 5,000 years ago.

• Neo-Eskimo: Displaced the Paleo-Eskimos around 1,000 years ago.

George Hunt Williamson believed that early ET contact inspired many American Indian legends (e.g. the star people). Curiously, John Keel wrote in Saga (Oct. 1974) that the Eskimos “maintain that they were originally flown to the far north in ‘metal birds.’” He did not provide a source, however, and the belief is not widely reported. Regarding Native tribes’ own accounts of their origins, in Giants on Record Jim Vieira and Hugh Newman quote historian Vine DeLoria as writing:

Some tribes speak of transoceanic migrations in boats, the Hopis and Colvilles for example, and others speak of the experience of a creation, such as the Yakimas and other Pacific Northwest tribes. Some tribes even talk about migrations from other planets.

In Cometary Encounters (2021), Pierre Lescaudron summarizes the evidence suggesting a comet-induced cataclysm 7,200 years ago, including a mercury spike in peat cores, a sulfur dioxide spike in ice cores, increased volcanic activity at the time and archaeological evidence of societal disruption or collapse of neolithic cultures (e.g. in Turkey, Iraq, Southeast Asia, China and Far Eastern Russia).

August 29, 1998

Q: According to the Sumerian traditions [as recounted by Berossus in the 3rd century BC], this was like the god Oannes [also fish-garbed, like Tiwanaku’s “Friar”]. In the night time, he would plunge back into the sea, but in the daytime he would converse with men, giving them insight into letters and sciences and every kind of art. But, it was noted that he was never observed to eat. It says that he taught men how to construct houses, temples, to compile laws, and explained to them the principles of geometric knowledge. He made them distinguish the seeds of the earth and made them gather fruits. In short, he instructed them in everything that would tend to soften manners and humanize mankind. From that time, so universal were his instructions, that nothing has been added materially in the way of improvement. The surviving images of Oannes on Babylonian and Assyrian reliefs clearly portray him as a fish man. Is this another similar profile?

A: “El legato.” [El legado means “the legacy” in Spanish. Legato means “tied together” in Italian. “Shared legacy”?]

The Apkallu

March 9, 2024

Q: (Approaching Infinity) What [was] Oannes?

A: Lizzie.

In this and other sessions, the C’s identify two classes of culture-bringers or civilizing heroes. The first is described as human survivors of the cataclysm that destroyed the pre–Younger Dryas civilization (“Atlantis”), who literally went underground and later reseeded civilization after the collapse and slow recovery of humanity (see volume 1). (The Atlantean survivors allegedly went underground between the 12,400 BC and 10,900 BC catastrophes.) Examples of these figures include the legendary robed figures described as having fair skin and beards, such as Quetzalcoatl (Mexico), Viracocha (Bolivia) and Osiris (Egypt).

Noting the sometimes very specific similarities between Mesopotamian, Egyptian and Central/South American myths, architecture and religious beliefs, Graham Hancock similarly argues that these civilizations represent independent manifestations of a common legacy passed on by a prior advanced civilization, one which collapsed during the Younger Dryas catastrophe, and that the above culture heroes were representatives of this civilization. Hancock finds three motifs often found grouped together: bearded men, serpents and crosses. (In one early session, the C’s associated the cross with “the Lizzie disinformation campaign” [1995-3-18].)

Here the C’s identify a second class of civilizer, marking out Oannes as an actual Reptilian. As in the above depiction, Oannes was said to “wear” a fish skin, “which he could remove and put back on at will,” as Bruce Rux puts it, potentially a cultural memory of the variable physicality of these 4D beings. (Quetzalcoatl – “Plumed Serpent” – was also sometimes depicted as an actual snake or a man whose head emerges from a snake’s mouth, whereas the earliest depictions simply show him as a bearded Caucasian.)

Oannes was one of the Babylonian apkallu or Sumerian abgal, wise sages tasked with teaching humanity the benefits of civilization. In addition to Oannes’s fish-scale garment, the apkallu were sometimes depicted with the heads of birds. Eventually, they began to mate with human women, producing hybrid children (or demigods). Incidentally, according to the Epic of Gilgamesh, the apkallu themselves designed and built the walls Uruk.

For Sagan and Shklovsky, writing in 1966, this Sumerian account – which depicts them and their civilization as having a direct “non-human origin” – most clearly fulfilled “some of our criteria for a genuine contact myth.” They noted that the Sumerians conceived of the cosmos “as a state governed by an apparently representative and democratic assembly of the gods,” an idea that resonates with the “Quorum” (a Cassiopaean concept that will be discussed in a future series).

DeLonge and Levenda note that this council or assembly (the apkallu, abgal, or bene elohim) were “in charge of the situation on Earth,” and their mating with human wives produced the Nephilim or giants. However, at some point after the Flood, the gods disappeared: “The loss of contact with these supernatural beings was lamented in the Sumerian hymns and incantations. Rituals evolved to bring them back, at least temporarily, using sacrifices and sacred marriages.”

Jim Vieira sees connections between the apkallu and the “androgynous, amphibious, self-fertilizing, husband/wife-team” culture heroes/gods of numerous cultures, such as the Egyptian ogdoad (8 serpent- and frog-headed gods), the Mali Dogon’s Nommo (or “Monitors,” also 8 in number), the serpent-tailed Fuxi and Nuwa of China (traditionally dated to around 2600 BC), the Peruvian Viracocha and Mama Qucha (also serpent-tailed), and the Inuit goddess of the sea Sedna.

August 28, 1999

Q: I have this book, this Marcia Schafer thing, Confessions of an Intergalactic Anthropologist, and its a bunch of channeled stuff. One thing she says: “the snake is associated with the sign of wisdom and higher learning, and is often regarded quite highly in mystical circles.” She had an interaction with a rattlesnake, for which she felt sympathy, and she also has sympathetic interactions with Lizzies. I would like to have a comment on the idea of the snake as a “sign of wisdom and higher learning.” Does this, in fact, represent what the snake symbolizes?

A: Snake is/was reported in context of the viewpoint of the observer.

Q: Are you saying that when the observer’s viewpoint is that the snake is a symbol of higher learning, maybe…

A: Maybe the observer was just “blown away” by the experience.

Q: Clarify, please.

A: If you were living in the desert, or jungle, about 7,000 years ago, as you measure time, would you not be impressed if these reptoid “dudes” came down from the heavens in silvery objects and demonstrated techno-wonders from thousands of years in the future, and taught you calculus, geometry and astrophysics to boot?!?

Q: Is that, in fact, what happened?

A: Yup.

The above is perhaps an allusion to the progenitors of the Mexican Olmecs and later Mayans, discussed below.

October 20, 1994

Q: Who built the city of Mohenjo-daro [the Indus Valley city in modern Pakistan]?

A: Lizards directly. Coatzlmundi legend ties in to this directly. Look at illustrations on stones now.

Q: Who is Coatzlmundi [see below]?

A: Other deity of the Lizards worshipped by the Atlanteans and their descendants because of the direct contact with humans for 1000 years.

Mohenjo-daro

Q: Now, you said Mohenjo-daro was built by the Lizzies directly. Did they occupy this city themselves?

A: No.

Q: When was this city last inhabited continually?

A: 3065 years ago.

Q: When was it built?

A: 6092 years ago.

One of the Indus-Sarasvati civilization’s major sites, Mohenjo-daro was an advanced city, seemingly built on a pre-planned template, with multi-story houses, garbage collection and an extensive sewage system. It is conventionally thought to have reached its peak around 4,500 years ago (ya) and was abandoned by 3,700 ya. The civilization itself is believed to have begun emerging around 5300 ya, but a preceding site, Mehrgarh, shows signs of occupation beginning around 8800 ya. (See Graham Hancock’s Underworld [2002].)

September 23, 2023

Q: (irjO) Now, the name of that deity [Coatzlmundi] sounds very similar to the Aztec language called Nahuatl. Coincidentally or not, they worshiped a goddess called Coatlicue, which means “Serpent Skirt.” Was this the same entity?

A: Yes.

“Coatzl” suggests “coatl,” Nahuatl for “snake,” paired with “mundi” (Latin for “world”), evoking a symbolic meaning like “cosmic serpent,” a concept tied to many myths and esoteric traditions. For example, Sesha (“Remainder,” or Ananta, “Endlessness”), the Hindu cosmic serpent, represents the “remainder” of destroyed creations: non-existence (i.e. the STS “thought center”). Others include: Tiamat (Babylonian), Jörmungandr (Norse), Apep (Egyptian), Leviathan (Hebrew), Yamata no Orochi (Japanese).

Q: (irjO) Why were Lizard beings able to coexist with us back then but can’t directly do it now?

A: Cosmic environment was different.

October 22, 1994 (direct channeling)

Q: (L) Did any aliens at all, and specifically the Lizzies, ever live among mankind and receive worship?

A: They did not live among mankind, but they did interact directly with human beings, at various points in the past. It was at those points when human beings were ready, willing and able to accept deities appearing directly from outside sources and then worship them. Such things would not have occurred in the recent past. But, beware, it may very well occur very soon.

Q: (L) Who made the Nazca lines in South America and what was their purpose?

A: Those were natives living in the area at the particular time who were highly advanced spiritually and they put those lines there to call to others that were coming from what they perceived to be an outer space location.

Q: (L) Were they symbols of power in any way?

A: […] some may have perceived them as such but they were mainly an effort to call forth those who had been worshiped and had appeared to them previously from the outside including not only the Lizard beings, but other travelers.

The Peruvian Nazca lines, which depict a variety of animals, birds and geometrical forms, are only visible from the sky. Constructed no later than 600 AD (and potentially much earlier), the forms were created in at least two phases, the first more complex and precise than the second. The locals attribute them to the “Viracochas,” whom they regard as demigods.

In America Before, Hancock argues for a connection between the Nazca lines and the Amazonian geoglyphs. Two of the animals depicted in the lines are Amazonian species, e.g. the Myrmecium spider and the spiral woolly monkey. In Heaven’s Mirror, he cites Drs. Maria Reiche and Phillis Pitluga, who argued that many of the Nazca lines represent constellations (e.g. the spider is Orion, the monkey is Ursa Major) occupying the western half of the night sky: “This was the region in which many ancient cultures, including the Egyptians and the Maya, believed that the gateway to the netherworld was located.”

Q: (L) Who built the city of Angkor Wat?

A: That was built by the Lizard beings themselves. Built approximately 3,108 years ago.

The Angkor complex in Cambodia consists of 72 temples and monuments, the most impressive of which is Angkor Wat. In Heaven’s Mirror (1998), Hancock writes: “Indisputable archaeological and inscription evidence proves that the temples of Angkor were built by named and known Khmer monarchs, almost all of whom reigned during the four centuries between AD 802 and AD 1220,” with Angkor Wat built as the funerary temple for Suryavarman II in 1150 AD, two thousand years after the date given above by the C’s. However, as Hancock adds: “All the major temples of Angkor also show similar traces of having been built directly on top of earlier structures which may in turn have been built on the sites of earlier structures still.” Angkor Wat itself was said to be a “copy” of an earlier temple.

However, the region shows no precedents or gradual evolution to such architecture. The god-king who initiated construction at Angkor was Jayavarman II, in 802 AD. As Hancock notes, his origins are “extremely obscure.” He is said to have come “from across the sea by boat, having previously spent several years in a far-off land at the court of a monarch named the ‘King of the Mountain’.” The region was in chaos at the time, and the young prince reconquered the kingdom, setting himself up as god-king.

From the beginning, Jayavarman behaved like a man with a mission, determined to fulfil specific objectives within a specific time-frame. […] There is a sense about the whole [420-year long building] enterprise of an ordered plan, of a grand design being methodically completed, making use of natural features of the landscape where possible, incorporating precise astronomical alignments, and reinforcing itself with pervasive Draco symbolism in the form of serpents and myths about serpents.

The above details suggest Jayavarman II himself may have been a “deep-level punctuator,” who emerges “from seeming obscurity to ‘make a mark’ on history,” like Sargon of Akkad.

Q: (L) Who built the city of Mohenjo-daro?

A: That also was built by the Lizard Beings directly.

Q: (L) Did they live in these cities?

A: No, as stated before, they did not live there, they visited or occupied on a temporary basis, but did not live there.

Q: (L) Who did they build the cities for?

A: They built the cities for themselves and their worshipers amongst humans.

August 22, 1998

Q: We watched this television show the other night which talked about the city of Angkor Wat and its orientation to [the constellation] Draco, 10,500 BC. [This was Hancock’s argument in Heaven’s Mirror. This is the same date that the pyramids at Giza align with the stars of Orion’s belt and the Sphinx faces Leo.] You said that Angkor Wat was built 3,108 years ago by the Lizzies themselves, and that the city of Mohenjo-daro was also [last inhabited] 3,065 years ago, which is within 30 or 40 years of the same time period. Do you still confirm that the Lizzies themselves built these cities?

A: Reptilian beings.

Q: And they did this themselves?

A: Yes.

Serpentine demigods, or Nāga, form a central theme in the imagery and layout of Angkor Wat. In Heaven’s Mirror, Hancock quotes one scholar as writing that Angkor Wat “was wholly dedicated to serpent worship. Every angle of every roof is adorned with a seven-headed serpent.” In Hinduism, Nagas are “cobra-kings who rule on earth but who are ranked amongst the gods.” They are “shape-changers who can appear, at will, as fully human or as strange and wonderful hybrids – human above the waist and serpent below” (see the depiction of Kukulkan further below). Naga-like imagery is also common in Egyptian and Mayan art, one of many similarities between the Cambodian Angkor temples and those cultures noted by Hancock.

Angkor Wat naga and guardian lion.

Q: What happened to the inhabitants of these cities?

A: Taken to another planet.

Angkor was continuously populated until the 15th or 16th century. Its collapse is ascribed to environmental conditions, political instability and the inability of its infrastructure to accomodate its then-growing population.

Q: Why was this city built in orientation to the constellation Draco?

A: Was not, was a record: see the texts of Kaballah [sic] for details after linkage is established. [The Kabbalah reference remains inscrutable.]

Q: After what linkage is established?

A: Between the astronomical data and the sites.

That is, perhaps the layout was merely a record of the 10,900 BC global cataclysm associated with the Younger Dryas, drawing attention to that date but not necessarily built at that time. Hancock suggests a few possibilities: 1) that the major temples corresponding to stars were built atop sites already plotted thousands of years ago, 2) an accurate sky-map was passed down through time, later used by the priests/builders, or 3) the builders were expert astronomers and calculated the alignment.

April 27, 2024

Q: (irjO) The C’s mentioned that Lizard beings could live among us in the past because the cosmic environment was different back then. They also mentioned that they built Angkor Wat around 3,100 years ago. When was the last time/year in our known timeline when they were present among people?

A: 2300 BC.

This contradicts the previous claim about Angkor Wat, dated more than one thousand years after 2300 BC. This date is very close to the mid-24th century BC climate anomaly (2354 to 2345 BC), which dendrochronologist Mike Baillie argues was caused by a comet strike. This is supported by tree-ring data, archaeological deposits in Mesopotamia suggestive of a 100-megaton air blast, cultural records from China and ancient Mexico, societal collapse around this time in the Near East and the Neolithic-to-Bronze Age transition in the British Isles.

Ra gave an answer in the same ballpark, claiming that direct physical contact ended circa 1600 BC, a date also associated with a potential cometary catastrophe. Lescaudron also summarizes the evidence for this date (1628 BC) in Cometary Encounters, including ice core sulfate spikes, tree-ring anomalies, multiple near-simultaneous volcanic eruptions and Chinese records of celestial and seismic disturbances. Horn also believed that the “negative ETs” went underground (literally) sometime between 2,000 and 600 BC, “where they have secretly manipulated and controlled humankind until the present day.”

August 14, 2016

Q: (L) Maybe [Zarathustra] wasn’t wrong when he said that the daevas were demons. Were the daevas like STS beings?

A: Close.

Q: (L) Were they like 4th-density STS?

A: Yes.

In Hinduism, in opposition to Zoroastrianism, devas are benevolent gods, while there are both malevolent and benevolent asuras.

January 13, 2024

Q: (L) Here’s a question about Barabar caves in India. […] (irjO) Yeah, I think those, if I’m correct, those are the ones that are perfectly crafted. There are like three of them [actually six] in India. They are really perfectly crafted and there’s no way with our technology that we’ve done that. That’s it. That’s the only thing that I know.

A: Made by 4D STS to receive human worship directly.

Q: (Joe) Is the word “worship” there a euphemism?

A: No.

While the “caves” contain crude inscriptions dating as early as 250 BC, there is no evidence that they were created at that time. As with other such megalithic structures, it is more likely that they were already ancient by the time later rulers and inhabitants added their mark to them.

August 5, 2000

Q: Another idea in this document was that the patriarchal, monotheistic religion brought some measure of blanket protection. From this assessment, as soon as the patriarchal monotheism was installed on the planet, the alien presence withdrew. Is this a valid concept? Does the patriarchal monotheism act as a deterrent of alien intrusion into our reality?

A: This is a confused concept. Why would aliens install monotheistic principles if the result is to close off the contact opportunity?

August 20, 2001

Q What was the reason for the strange skull shape of Nefertiti and her family?

A: Genetic tweak.

Q: Was this 4th-density genetic tweak done by STS or STO?

A: STS.

Statue of Nefertiti, Egypt, Tell el-Amarna

Bust of one of Nefertiti’s children

August 23, 2001

Q: (L) Could the story of Rachel stealing her father’s household gods actually be the story of Sara stealing the Ark from Akhenaten?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) No wonder Akhenaten was hot to follow them. He wasn’t after Sara, he wanted his Ark back.

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Who gave the Ark [of the Covenant] to Akhenaten?

A: STS 4th density.

This refers back to an earlier explanation of the Ark:

November 7, 1994

Q: (L) What was the “Ark of the Covenant”?

A: Power cell.

Q: (L) What was the origin of this power cell?

A: Lizards given to the Jews to use for manipulation of others.

Q: (L) Why was it that if you came close to this object or touched it you would die?

A: Energy overload; scrambling by reverse electromagnetism.

Both Graham Hancock and David Hatcher Childress have written books on the Ark: The Sign and the Seal (1992) and Ark of God (2015), respectively. Bruce Rux cites Maurice Denis-Papin as determining that the Ark was an energy accumulator “capable of holding five hundred to seven hundred volts per vertical meter when contained in a dry space, dischargeable to the earth by means of its garlands.”

Q: (L) Who was or is Baal [the Canaanite-Phoenician storm god, also found in various Semitic and Mesopotamian pantheons]?

A: Lizard.

Q: (L) Beelzebub [a Philistine god in the Old Testament]?

A: Same.

Q: (L) Were these actual names of individual Lizards?

A: No. Personifications.

April 8, 2023

Q: (Ursus Minor) Whose technology is depicted on the Abydos Temple hieroglyphic panel?

A: Alien.

The question probably refers to the infamous Egyptian “helicopter” and “blimp,” which are actually the result of one set of hieroglyphs overlapping an earlier set, the panel in question being a palimpsest. (The temple also hosts a depiction of the Osiris fetish, which may depict some forms of unknown technology.) However, 40 miles east of Abydos is the Hathor Temple at Dendera, which more clearly depicts what appears to be odd technology, including the Djed pillar also found at Abydos.

While the Temple of Seti I at Abydos was constructed around 1300 BC, it was built around a structure much older: the Osireion. Like the oldest structures at Giza, it was built with massive blocks of stone unadorned by any ornamentation or hieroglyphs. And like the ancient Mexican Teotihuacán complex, it was oriented east of due north.

According to legend, Osiris – from whom the Osireion gets its name – civilized the ancient Egyptians before leaving to spread his knowledge to other nations. He taught by means of music and song, bringing familiar skills to the first Egyptians: astronomy, architecture, mathematics, writing and agriculture.

Q: (Navigator) The ruler of the Aztecs was oddly welcoming to the Spanish Conquistadors when they arrived, why was that?

A: Prophecy.

Q: (L) They expected somebody to arrive?

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) And the prophecy was from their previous alien overlords?

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) And they did that on purpose to set them up to be conquered and destroyed? (L) Yes. Just like people are saying that the aliens are coming to save people now.

A: Yes.

The Aztecs were infamous for their prolific practice of human sacrifice. According to their beliefs, “the gods required constant infusions of human blood in order to survive,” as DeLonge and Levenda put it. (Chief among these was Huitzilopochtli.) Human energy and life-force, which properly belonged to the god, were liberated via bloody sacrifice and thus returned to him. This energy was strongest and purest in children: “The only way to release that imprisoned deity was one in which the spirit was wrenched free of the body: the limbs severed, the head severed, the heart removed from the chest.” This practice, and the underlying justifications for it, closely resemble what the C’s have said about animal and human mutilations and alien nourishment, possibly reflecting a time when such beings ruled directly and required such sustenance.

The Aztecs were preceded by the Mayans and the Olmecs, the earliest known Mexican civilization. Like Viracocha in South America, Quetzalcoatl is reputed to have sailed to Mexico, bringing civilization and teaching advanced mathematics and calendrical formulae, astronomy, architecture, agriculture, etc. He was white, bearded and robed, attended by a group of assistants, founded cities, created laws (including condemning human sacrifice), then sailed off to sea. The Aztecs believed that Quetzalcoatl would one day return.

Quetzalcoatl is said to have landed at Coatzacoalcos (“Serpent Sanctuary”) in the Olmec homeland. (His capital was Teotihuacán, a potentially much older site.) While the Olmecs seemingly came out of nowhere with a fully developed culture around 1500 BC, the oldest Mexican mound/pyramid, Cholula (the largest, by volume, in the world), may be older than 8500 years. Hancock suggests that some of the structures associated with the Olmecs may also have been constructed much earlier and merely adopted by them. Their calendar (later adopted by the Maya) for the present age (the “Fifth Sun”) begins at 3114 BC, close to the origin of the first Egyptian dynasties – another culture that emerged “all at once and fully formed,” as Hancock put it, with a complex writing system and advanced construction techniques (which only degenerated over time). The Hindu Kali Yuga also began in 3100 BC.

Recall that the C’s identified a feature of Olmec art (the cleft forehead) as a symbol of the “Nation of the Third Eye” (the undergrounders), i.e. Quetzalcoatl’s origin.

Q: (Alejo) A recent study discovered that plants do have a spoken language that sits beyond audible frequencies for humans. Was that language the source of humans learning about plant’s specific medicinal properties?

A: No.

Q: (L) What is the source of humans learning about plants’ medicinal properties?

A: Alien teachers in some cases. In others it was information transfer on higher level.

August 20, 2001

Q: Was the Yellow Emperor of China… he had some talking, walking tripods. Were these things similar to the Ark of the Covenant?

A: No.

Q: What were his tripods?

A: Ground communicators.

Q: What did they communicate with? Each other, or something in the sky?

A: Both.

Q: What was in the sky that they communicated with?

A: Mothership.

Q: What was on the mothership?

A: Lizards.

Q: (T) You said that many groups built Rock Lake. Who were some of the many groups?

A: Aryans.

Q: In conjunction with who?

A: Lizards.

Q: (L) Is that why the Indians have these glyphs about snakes and serpents and stuff?

A: Yes.

August 23, 2001

Q: (L) Well, where did Huangdi [the Yellow Emperor] come from?

A: Orion lab.

One of the legendary first emperors of China, Huangdi is traditionally dated prior to the Erlitou period, in the 3rd millenium BC, but first attested much later during the late Zhou dynasty (in the 4th century BC). These first Sovereigns and Emperors, like Quetzalcoatl, are credited with inventing farming, the calendar and Chinese script, teaching architecture and the use of fire, and discovering medicine – perhaps a cultural memory of similar civilization founders.

November 16, 1994

Q: (L) Did any groups of the black race, on their own, ever create a high civilization, as has been reported by several archaeologists or other individuals? [Perhaps a reference to Kingdom of Aksum in what is now northern Ethiopia and Eritrea, from the 1st to 7th centuries AD. See the Obelisk of Axum, for instance.]

A: Yes.

Q: (L) On their own without assistance?

A: No.

Q: (L) Who did they have assistance from?

A: Lizards.

Mayan serpent god Kukulkan, their name for Quetzalcoatl.

December 10, 1994

Q: (L) What happened to the Mayans [ca. 900 AD, which saw the decline, collapse and abandonment of many Mayan cities and the cessation of monument building]?

A: Taken by Lizard beings to cosmos in 4D. “Lizzieland.”

Q: (L) What did they do with them there?

A: Many possibilities.

Q: (L) Do any of those possibilities include having them for dinner? […]

A: Maybe.

August 5, 1995 (direct channeling)

Q: (L) Who and what were the Mayans?

A: The Mayans were a transitory people who still exist in the lands that you refer to as Central America and who have certain physical features that are not consistent with the rest of human beings on 3rd-density Earth environment, due to their interactions in the past […] with beings of other density levels.

Q: […] (L) The Lizard beings?

A: Indeed.

August 29, 1998

Q: It also says here [in Hancock’s Fingerprints of the Gods] that on this [Mayan] pyramid [at Chichén Itzá], at the time of the spring and autumn equinoxes, combined patterns of light and dark combine “to create the illusion of a giant serpent undulating on the northern staircase. On each occasion the illusion lasted for 3 hours and 22 minutes exactly.” What was this optical illusion created to convey?

A: Worship of serpentine deity.

As with Angkor Wat and Draco, the Mayan city of Utatlan’s shape reflects the constellation Orion (as discovered by archaeologists Jose Fernandez and Robert Cormack and discussed in Hancock’s Heaven’s Mirror). Like the Egyptians, the Mayans saw the Milky Way as a road to the netherworld.

Most of the cultures identified as interacting with Reptilians either directly (Mesopotamia, Bolivia/Peru, India, Cambodia) or indirectly (Mexico, Africa) were archaic or proto-states ruled by “god-kings.” (The Aztec and Angkor’s Khmer are more properly considered empires.) Anthropologist Bruce Trigger, in Understanding Early Civilizations (2003), identified common features seemingly shared by all such states, including cities with monumental architecture, agriculture, writing, extreme class-based inequality, slavery, divine kings and human sacrifice.

The earliest known archaic states are the Sumerian (4000–1500 BC), Egyptian (3100–1100 BC) Indus-Sarasvati (3300–1700 BC), Chinese (1900–800 BC), and Olmec (1500–400 BC). The Mayan, Peruvian and sub-Saharan African archaic states did not develop until centuries later, and the Germanic chiefdoms didn’t achieve archaic state status until as late as the 5th century AD. If the C’s presentation is broadly correct, then Reptilian influence may be universally associated with the god-king system of proto-states, complex agricultural societies larger than simple chiefdoms, but smaller than mega-empires (e.g. the Persian, Roman and Han Empires) and modern nation-states.

March 9, 2024

Q: (Altair) Why do Basques have the highest incidence of RH negative blood of any people in the world?

A: Less mixing with outsiders. But also consider the indigenous people of South America and the Western Hemisphere.

March 29, 2025

Q: (Altair) Was RH negative blood originally the result of some genetic manipulations?

A: Yes.

Q: (Altair) If so, for what purpose?

A: Those most connected to off-world bloodlines.

Q: (L) So was it genetically manipulated off-world in an older time and place? Is that what you’re suggesting?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And it’s more closely connected. Are these bloodlines negative bloodlines?

A: Some but not the way promoted by the ignorant.

Q: (L) You mean all those people who say if you’ve got RH negative, you’re reptilian. Is that it?

A: Yes.

Elsewhere, the C’s trace the origins of the Basques and their language (which is unrelated linguistically to any other living language) to Atlantis, the pre–Younger Dryas civilization (1994-10-7). The Basques have a higher percentage of early hunter-gatherer genetics than other Europeans, and less from the Neolithic farmers that entered Europes around 8,000 years ago. Their location is relatively conducive to geographical and cultural isolation.

Peter Khoury had an abduction experience in 1992 similar to Antônio Vilas-Boas’s 35 years before. He was forced into sexual acts with a “strange female being,” as Australian researcher Bill Chalker described it in his book Hair of the Alien (2005). One of the women in the encounter looked Asian, the other blond and less human-looking. After the encounter, Peter found “some very fine wispy hair under his foreskin.” When analyzed, the hair showed Basque-Gaelic DNA in its root, but rare Chinese Mongoloid DNA in two parts of its shaft.

Next: Ancient Aliens Part 3 – Giants